Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Novel black hole bound states and entropy

T. R. Govindarajan* and Rakesh Tibrewala

  • Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, 600 113, India

  • *trg@imsc.res.in
  • rtibs@imsc.res.in

Phys. Rev. D 83, 124045 – Published 27 June, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.124045

Abstract

We solve for the spectrum of the Laplacian as a Hamiltonian on R2D and in R3B. A self-adjointness analysis with D and B as the boundary for the two cases shows that a general class of boundary conditions for which the Hamiltonian operator is essentially self-adjoint are of the mixed (Robin) type. With this class of boundary conditions we obtain “bound state” solutions for the Schroedinger equation. Interestingly, these solutions are all localized near the boundary. We further show that the number of bound states is finite and is in fact proportional to the perimeter or area of the removed disc or ball. We then argue that similar considerations should hold for static black hole backgrounds with the horizon treated as the boundary.

Article Text

References (25)

  1. J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973).
  2. S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975).
  3. A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 379, 99 (1996).
  4. A. Ashtekar, J. Baez, A. Corichi, and K. Krasnov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 904 (1998).
  5. R. K. Kaul and P. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5255 (2000).
  6. S. Carlip, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2828 (1999).
  7. T. Padmanabhan, Rep. Prog. Phys. 73, 046901 (2010).
  8. L. Bombelli, R. K. Koul, J. Lee, and R. D. Sorkin, Phys. Rev. D 34, 373 (1986); M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 666 (1993); S. Das, S. Shankaranarayanan, and S. Sur, arXiv:0806.0402.
  9. G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B256, 727 (1985).
  10. G. ’t Hooft, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 11, 4623 (1996).
  11. J. D. Bekenstein, Lett. Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 11, 467 (1974).
  12. J. D. Bekenstein and V. F. Mukhanov, Phys. Lett. B 360, 7 (1995).
  13. T. R. Govindarajan, V. Suneeta, and S. Vaidya, Nucl. Phys. B583, 291 (2000).
  14. M. Asorey, A. Ibort, and G. Marmo, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20, 1001 (2005).
  15. S. K. Chakrabarti, P. R. Giri, and K. S. Gupta, Eur. Phys. J. C 60, 169 (2009).
  16. M. V. Berry and M. R. Dennis, J. Phys. A 41, 135203 (2008).
  17. M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics (Academic Press, New York, 1980), Vol. I–IV.
  18. Kumar S. Gupta (private communication).
  19. M. Banados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1849 (1992).
  20. I. Ichinose and Y. Satoh, Nucl. Phys. B447, 340 (1995).
  21. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984).
  22. H. E. Camblong and C. R. Ordonez, Phys. Rev. D 71, 104029 (2005).
  23. D. Birmingham, Kumar S. Gupta, and S. Sen, Phys. Lett. B 505, 191 (2001).
  24. T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D 18, 3598 (1978).
  25. R. H. Price and K. S. Thorne, Phys. Rev. D 33, 915 (1986).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation