Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Fourth generation bound states

Koji Ishiwata and Mark B. Wise

  • California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 91125 USA

Phys. Rev. D 83, 074015 – Published 14 April, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.074015

Abstract

We investigate the spectrum and wave functions of q¯q bound states for heavy fourth generation quarks (q) that have a very small mixing with the three observed generations of standard model quarks. Such bound states come with different color, spin and flavor quantum numbers. Since the fourth generation Yukawa coupling, λq, is large we include all perturbative corrections to the potential between the heavy quark and antiquark of order λq2Nc/16π2 where Nc is the number of colors, as well as relativistic corrections suppressed by (v/c)2. We find that the lightest fourth generation quark masses for which a bound state exists for color octet states. For the color singlet states, which always have a bound state, we analyze the influence that the Higgs couplings have on the size and binding energy of the bound states.

Article Text

References (21)

  1. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 091801 (2010); C. J. Flacco, D. Whiteson, and M. Kelly, arXiv:1101.4976.
  2. G. D. Kribs, T. Plehn, M. Spannowsky, and T. M. P. Tait, Phys. Rev. D 76, 075016 (2007).
  3. H. J. He, N. Polonsky, and S. F. Su, Phys. Rev. D 64, 053004 (2001).
  4. B. Holdom, Phys. Rev. D 54, R721 (1996).
  5. J. Erler and P. Langacker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 031801 (2010).
  6. M. S. Chanowitz, Phys. Rev. D 82, 035018 (2010).
  7. O. Eberhardt, A. Lenz, and J. Rohrwild, Phys. Rev. D 82, 095006 (2010).
  8. M. S. Chanowitz, M. A. Furman, and I. Hinchliffe, Phys. Lett. B 78, 285 (1978).
  9. M. S. Chanowitz, M. A. Furman, and I. Hinchliffe, Nucl. Phys. B153, 402 (1979).
  10. M. S. Chanowitz, Phys. Lett. B 352, 376 (1995).
  11. R. F. Dashen and H. Neuberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1897 (1983).
  12. M. B. Einhorn and G. J. Goldberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2115 (1986).
  13. P. H. Frampton, P. Q. Hung, and M. Sher, Phys. Rep. 330, 263 (2000).
  14. M. Hashimoto, Phys. Rev. D 81, 075023 (2010).
  15. P. Fileviez Perez and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D 82, 011901 (2010).
  16. P. Q. Hung and C. Xiong, Nucl. Phys. B847, 160 (2011).
  17. P. Q. Hung and C. Xiong, Phys. Lett. B 694, 430 (2011); arXiv:1012.4479.
  18. B. Holdom, W. S. Hou, T. Hurth, M. L. Mangano, S. Sultansoy, and G. Unel, PMC Phys. A 3, 4 (2009).
  19. B. Holdom, Phys. Lett. B 686, 146 (2010).
  20. A. V. Manohar and I. W. Stewart, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 94, 130 (2001); HEAVY FLAVOR PHYSICS: Ninth International Symposium on Heavy Flavor Physics, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 618, (AIP, New York, 2002).
  21. A. V. Manohar and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 62, 074015 (2000).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation