Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Model-independent constraints on the shape parameters of dilepton angular distributions

Pietro Faccioli1, Carlos Lourenço2, João Seixas1,3, and Hermine K. Wöhri1,2

  • 1Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas (LIP), 1000-149 Lisbon, Portugal
  • 2European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
  • 3Physics Department, Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal

Phys. Rev. D 83, 056008 – Published 9 March, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.056008

Abstract

The coefficients determining the dilepton decay angular distribution of vector particles obey certain positivity constraints and a rotation-invariant identity. These relations are a direct consequence of the covariance properties of angular momentum eigenstates and are independent of the production mechanism. The Lam-Tung relation can be derived as a particular case, simply recognizing that the Drell-Yan dilepton is always produced transversely polarized with respect to one or more quantization axes. The dilepton angular distribution continues to be characterized by a frame-independent identity also when the Lam-Tung relation is violated. Moreover, the violation can be easily characterized by measuring a one-dimensional distribution depending on one shape coefficient.

Article Text

References (14)

  1. P. Faccioli, C. Lourenço, and J. Seixas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 061601 (2010).
  2. C. S. Lam and W. K. Tung, Phys. Rev. D 18, 2447 (1978).
  3. E. Mirkes and J. Ohnemus, Phys. Rev. D 51, 4891 (1995).
  4. E. L. Berger, J.-W. Qiu, and R. A. Rodriguez-Pedraza, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074006 (2007).
  5. D. M. Brink and G. R. Satchler, Angular Momentum (Clarendon, Oxford, 1993), 3rd ed..
  6. P. Faccioli, C. Lourenço, and J. Seixas, Phys. Rev. D 81, 111502(R) (2010).
  7. E. L. Berger and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 940 (1979); E. L. Berger, Z. Phys. C 4, 289 (1980); A. Brandenburg, S. J. Brodsky, V. V. Khoze, and D. Müller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 939 (1994); K. J. Eskola, P. Hoyer, M. Vänttinen, and R. Vogt, Phys. Lett. B 333, 526 (1994).
  8. D. Boer, Phys. Rev. D 60, 014012 (1999); D. Boer and P. J. Mulders, 57, 5780 (1998).
  9. F. Gelis and J. Jalilian-Marian, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074015 (2007).
  10. J. Collins and D. Soper, Phys. Rev. D 16, 2219 (1977).
  11. K. Gottfried and J. D. Jackson, Nuovo Cimento 33, 309 (1964).
  12. J. S. Conway et al. (E615 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 39, 92 (1989).
  13. M. Guanziroli et al. (NA10 Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 37, 545 (1988).
  14. L. Y. Zhu et al. (E866 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 082301 (2007); 102, 182001 (2009).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation