- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Probing the Higgs sector of high-scale supersymmetry-breaking models at the Tevatron

Marcela Carena1,2, Patrick Draper2, Sven Heinemeyer3, Tao Liu2,4, Carlos E. M. Wagner2,5,6, and Georg Weiglein7

  • 1Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
  • 2Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 3Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC-UC), E-39005 Santander, Spain
  • 4Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
  • 5HEP Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 6KICP and Department of Physics, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 7DESY, Notkestrasse 85, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 83, 055007 – Published 7 March, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.055007

Abstract

A canonical signature of the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM) is the presence of a neutral Higgs boson with mass bounded from above by about 135 GeV and standard model (SM)-like couplings to the electroweak gauge bosons. In this paper we investigate the reach of the Tevatron collider for the MSSM Higgs sector parameter space associated with a variety of high-scale minimal models of supersymmetry (SUSY) breaking, including the constrained MSSM, minimal gauge-mediated SUSY breaking, and minimal anomaly-mediated SUSY breaking. We find that the Tevatron can provide strong constraints on these models via Higgs boson searches. Considering a simple projection for the efficiency improvements in the Tevatron analyses, we find that with an integrated luminosity of 16  fb−1 per detector and an efficiency improvement of 20% compared to the present situation, these models could be probed essentially over their entire ranges of validity. With 40% analysis improvements and 16  fb−1, our projection shows that evidence at the 3σ level for the light Higgs boson could be expected in extended regions of parameter space.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (72)

  1. Fermilab Physics Advisory Committee, report available from http://www.fnal.gov/directorate/program_planning/Aug2010PACPublic/Aug2010PACReport.pdf.
  2. D. R. Wood (CDF and D0 Collaborations), arXiv:1011.1532.
  3. The TEVNPH Working Group of the CDF and D0 Collaborations, arXiv:1007.4587.
  4. M. Duhrssen, S. Heinemeyer, H. Logan, D. Rainwater, G. Weiglein, and D. Zeppenfeld, Phys. Rev. D 70, 113009 (2004).
  5. R. Lafaye, T. Plehn, M. Rauch, D. Zerwas, and M. Duhrssen, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2009) 009.
  6. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), arXiv:0901.0512.
  7. G. L. Bayatian et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. Phys. G 34, 995 (2007).
  8. A. De Roeck et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 66, 525 (2010).
  9. W. Fisher, slides available from http://indico.in2p3.fr/conferenceOtherViews.py?confId=2065&view=nicecompact&showDate=all&showSession=all&detailLevel=contribution.
  10. http://www.cdf.fnal.gov/physics/new/hdg/results/combcdf_mar09/.
  11. H. P. Nilles, Phys. Rep. 110, 1 (1984); H. E. Haber and G. L. Kane, 117, 75 (1985); S. P. Martin, arXiv:hep-ph/9709356.
  12. J. R. Ellis and D. V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. 110B, 44 (1982).
  13. S. Bertolini, F. Borzumati, A. Masiero, and G. Ridolfi, Nucl. Phys. B353, 591 (1991).
  14. G. Isidori and A. Retico, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2001) 001.
  15. A. J. Buras, P. H. Chankowski, J. Rosiek, and L. Slawianowska, Nucl. Phys. B659, 3 (2003).
  16. K. S. Babu and C. F. Kolda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 228 (2000).
  17. A. Dedes and A. Pilaftsis, Phys. Rev. D 67, 015012 (2003).
  18. H. Nilles, Phys. Lett. 115B, 193 (1982); Nucl. Phys. B217, 366 (1983); A. H. Chamseddine, R. Arnowitt, and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 970 (1982); R. Barbieri, S. Ferrara, and C. Savoy, Phys. Lett. 119B, 343 (1982); H. Nilles, M. Srednicki, and D. Wyler, 120B, 346 (1983); E. Cremmer, P. Fayet, and L. Girardello, 122B, 41 (1983); S. Ferrara, L. Girardello, and H. Nilles, 125B, 457 (1983); L. Hall, J. Lykken, and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 27, 2359 (1983); S. Soni and H. Weldon, Phys. Lett. 126B, 215 (1983); R. Arnowitt, A. Chamseddine, and P. Nath, Nucl. Phys. B227, 121 (1983); N. Ohta, Prog. Theor. Phys. 70, 542 (1983).
  19. For reviews see also [11]; A. Lahanas and D. Nanopoulos, Phys. Rep. 145, 1 (1987); S. Martin, in Perspectives on Supersymmetry, edited by G. Kane; see zippy.physics.niu.edu/primer.shtml.
  20. G. F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, Phys. Rep. 322, 419 (1999).
  21. I. Affleck, M. Dine, and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B256, 557 (1985).
  22. M. Dine, A. E. Nelson, Y. Nir, and Y. Shirman, Phys. Rev. D 53, 2658 (1996).
  23. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Nucl. Phys. B557, 79 (1999).
  24. G. F. Giudice, M. A. Luty, H. Murayama, and R. Rattazzi, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (1998) 027.
  25. J. Gunion, H. Haber, G. Kane, and S. Dawson, The Higgs Hunter’s Guide (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990).
  26. G. Degrassi, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, P. Slavich, and G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C 28, 133 (2003).
  27. J. R. Ellis, S. Heinemeyer, K. A. Olive, and G. Weiglein, Phys. Lett. B 515, 348 (2001).
  28. S. Ambrosanio et al., Nucl. Phys. B624, 3 (2002).
  29. S. Heinemeyer, X. Miao, S. Su, and G. Weiglein, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2008) 087.
  30. P. Draper, T. Liu, and C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 80, 035025 (2009).
  31. P. Draper, T. Liu, and C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 81, 015014 (2010).
  32. http://www.d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/higgs.htm.
  33. http://www.d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/prelim/HIGGS/H73/.
  34. http://www.d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/prelim/HIGGS/H59/; http://www.cdf.fnal.gov/physics/new/hdg/results/htt_070928/index.htm.
  35. V. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 682, 278 (2009).
  36. http://www.cdf.fnal.gov/physics/exotic/r2a/20060622.chiggs_levy/.
  37. V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 051803 (2009).
  38. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 78, 032008 (2008).
  39. V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 011801 (2006).
  40. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 021802 (2009).
  41. C. Balazs, J. L. Diaz-Cruz, H. J. He, T. M. P. Tait, and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 59, 055016 (1999).
  42. H. Baer, B. W. Harris, and X. Tata, Phys. Rev. D 59, 015003 (1998).
  43. M. Drees, M. Guchait, and P. Roy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2047 (1998); 81, 2394(E) (1998).
  44. M. S. Carena, S. Mrenna, and C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 60, 075010 (1999); 62, 055008 (2000).
  45. A. Belyaev, T. Han, and R. Rosenfeld, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2003) 021.
  46. V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 071804 (2008).
  47. A. Abulencia et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 011802 (2006).
  48. V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 051804 (2009).
  49. http://www.cdf.fnal.gov/physics/new/hdg/results/3b_susyhiggs_080229/; http://www.cdf.fnal.gov/physics/new/hdg//Results_files/results/3b_susyhiggs_jun10/.
  50. http://www.d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/prelim/HIGGS/H89/.
  51. http://www.d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/prelim/HIGGS/H87/.
  52. A. Abulencia et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 042003 (2006).
  53. B. C. Allanach, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143, 305 (2002).
  54. C. Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Lett. B 667, 1 (2008).
  55. M. Frank, T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak, and G. Weiglein, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2007) 047.
  56. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 343 (1999).
  57. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein, Comput. Phys. Commun. 124, 76 (2000).
  58. Tevatron Electroweak Working Group, CDF Collaboration, and D0 Collaboration, arXiv:1007.3178.
  59. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein, Phys. Rep. 425, 265 (2006).
  60. LEP Higgs Working Group, Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 547 (2006).
  61. M. Carena et al., http://beamdocs.fnal.gov/AD/DocDB/0036/003617/002/tevatron2014.pdf.
  62. D. Denisov, http://www.fnal.gov/directorate/program_planning/Aug2010PACPublic/Denisov_PACAug2010_HiggsQuestions.pdf.
  63. T. Moroi, Phys. Rev. D 53, 6565 (1996); 56, 4424(E) (1997).
  64. G. W. Bennett et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006).
  65. D. Stockinger, J. Phys. G 34, R45 (2007); J. Prades, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 3, 75 (2010); T. Teubner, K. Hagiwara, R. Liao, A. D. Martin, and D. Nomura, arXiv:1001.5401; M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1515 (2011).
  66. M. S. Carena, M. Olechowski, S. Pokorski, and C. E. M. Wagner, Nucl. Phys. B426, 269 (1994).
  67. LEP Higgs Working Group, Phys. Lett. B 565, 61 (2003).
  68. M. S. Carena, H. E. Haber, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, C. E. M. Wagner, and G. Weiglein, Nucl. Phys. B580, 29 (2000).
  69. J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa, M. Quiros, and A. Riotto, Nucl. Phys. B436, 3 (1995); B439, 466 (1995).
  70. M. Carena, J. Espinosa, M. Quirós, and C. Wagner, Phys. Lett. B 355, 209 (1995); M. Carena, M. Quirós, and C. Wagner, Nucl. Phys. B461, 407 (1996).
  71. H. Haber, R. Hempfling, and A. Hoang, Z. Phys. C 75, 539 (1997).
  72. H. Davoudiasl, T. Han, and H. E. Logan, Phys. Rev. D 71, 115007 (2005).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 83, 055007– Published 7 March, 2011
  • Received 14 December 2010
Article part of CHORUS

© 2011 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation