- Access by Xinjiang University
Nonet meson properties in the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model with dimensional versus cutoff regularization
Phys. Rev. D 83, 034005 – Published 7 February, 2011Erratum Phys. Rev. D 83, 039905 (2011)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.034005
Abstract
The Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model with a Kobayashi-Maskawa-’t Hooft term is one low energy effective theory of QCD which includes the anomaly. We investigate nonet meson properties in this model with three flavors of quarks. We employ two types of regularizations, the dimensional and sharp cutoff ones. The model parameters are fixed phenomenologically for each regularization. Evaluating the kaon decay constant, the meson mass and the topological susceptibility, we show the regularization dependence of the results and discuss the applicability of the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model.
Corrections
9 February, 2011
Erratum
Article Text
References (33)
- Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961); 124, 246 (1961).
- U. Vogl and W. Weise, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 27, 195 (1991).
- S. P. Klevansky, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 649 (1992).
- T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247, 221 (1994).
- S. Krewald and K. Nakayama, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 216, 201 (1992).
- T. Inagaki, T. Kouno, and T. Muta, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 10, 2241 (1995).
- R. G. Jafarov and V. E. Rochev, Russ. Phys. J. 49, 364 (2006).
- T. Inagaki, D. Kimura, and A. Kvinikhidze, Phys. Rev. D 77, 116004 (2008).
- T. Fujihara, D. Kimura, T. Inagaki, and A. Kvinikhidze Phys. Rev. D 79, 096008 (2009).
- R. S. Plant and M. C. Birse, Nucl. Phys. A628, 607 (1998); A703, 717 (2002).
- T. Hell, S. Roessner, M. Cristoforetti, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014022 (2009); 81, 074034 (2010).
- A. A. Osipov, A. H. Blin, and B. Hiller, arXiv:hep-ph/0410148; Nucl. Phys. A745, 81 (2004).
- T. Inagaki, S. D. Odintsov, and Yu. I Shil’nov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14, 481 (1999).
- T. Inagaki, D. Kimura, and T. Murata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 111, 371 (2004).
This might be the case only in the sharp cutoff regularization. Some form of the smooth cutoff (or some nonlocal extension of the NJL model, see, for example, [10, 11]) may lead to results close to ones obtained in the dimensional regularization.
- R. Casalbuoni, R. Gatto, G. Nardulli, and M. Ruggieri, Phys. Rev. D 68, 034024 (2003).
- M. Baldo, G. F. Burgio, P. Castorina, S. Plumari, and D. Zappala, Phys. Rev. C 75, 035804 (2007).
- R. L. S. Farias, G. Dallabona, G. Krein, and O. A. Battistel, Phys. Rev. C 77, 065201 (2008).
- P. Costa, H. Hansen, M. C. Ruivo, and C. A. de Sousa, Phys. Rev. D 81, 016007 (2010).
- M. Lutz, S. Klimt, and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A542, 521 (1992).
- P. Rehberg, S. P. Klevansky, and J. Hufner, Phys. Rev. C 53, 410 (1996).
- M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44, 1422 (1970); M. Kobayashi, H. Kondo, and T. Maskawa, 45, 1955 (1971).
- G. ’t Hooft, Phys. Rev. D 14, 3432 (1976); 18, 2199(E) (1978); Phys. Rep. 142, 357 (1986).
- M. Frank, M. Buballa, and M. Oertel, Phys. Lett. B 562, 221 (2003).
- K. Fukushima, K. Ohnishi, and K. Ohta, Phys. Rev. C 63, 045203 (2001).
- C. Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Lett. B 667, 1 (2008) and 2009 partial update for the 2010 edition.
- B. Alles, M. D’Elia, and A. Di Giacomo, Nucl. Phys. B494, 281 (1997); B679, 397(E) (2004).
- E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B156, 269 (1979).
- G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B159, 213 (1979).
- M. Gell-Mann, R. J. Oakes, and B. Renner, Phys. Rev. 175, 2195 (1968).
- P. Costa, M. C. Ruivo, C. A. de Sousa, and Yu. L. Kalinovsky, Phys. Rev. D 71, 116002 (2005); P. Costa, M. C. Ruivo, C. A. de Sousa, H. Hansen, and W. M. Alberico, 79, 116003 (2009).
- M. Buballa, Phys. Rep. 407, 205 (2005).
- J. W. Chen, K. Fukushima, H. Kohyama, K. Ohnishi, and U. Raha, Phys. Rev. D 81, 071501 (2010).