Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

New features in the curvaton model

Pravabati Chingangbam*,†

Qing-Guo Huang

  • Astrophysical Research Center for the Structure and Evolution of the Cosmos, Sejong University, 98 Gunja Dong, Gwangjin gu, Seoul 143747, Korea

  • Key Laboratory of Frontiers in Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

  • *Present address: Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Koramangala II Block, Bangalore 560034, India.
  • prava@kias.re.kr
  • huangqg@itp.ac.cn

Phys. Rev. D 83, 023527 – Published 27 January, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.023527

Abstract

We demonstrate novel features in the behavior of the second- and third-order nonlinearity parameters of the curvature perturbation, namely fNL and gNL, arising from nonlinear motion of the curvaton field. We investigate two classes of potentials for the curvaton—the first has tiny oscillations superimposed upon the quadratic potential. The second is characterized by a single “feature” separating two quadratic regimes with different mass scales. The feature may either be a bump or a flattening of the potential. In the case of the oscillatory potential, we find that, as the width and height of superimposed oscillations increase, both fNL and gNL deviate strongly from their expected values from a quadratic potential. fNL changes sign from positive to negative as the oscillations in the potential become more prominent. Hence, this model can be severely constrained by convincing evidence from observations that fNL is positive. gNL, on the other hand, acquires very large negative values. Further, this model can give rise to a large running of fNL, with respect to scale. For the single-feature potential, we find that fNL and gNL exhibit oscillatory behavior as a function of the parameter that controls the feature. The running of fNL with respect to scale is found to be small.

Article Text

References (45)

  1. A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981).
  2. A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1110 (1982).
  3. K. Enqvist and M. S. Sloth, Nucl. Phys. B626, 395 (2002).
  4. D. H. Lyth and D. Wands, Phys. Lett. B 524, 5 (2002).
  5. T. Moroi and T. Takahashi, Phys. Lett. B 522, 215 (2001); 539, 303(E) (2002).
  6. E. Komatsu et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 192, 18 (2011).
  7. V. Desjacques and U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. D 81, 023006 (2010).
  8. J. Smidt, A. Amblard, A. Cooray, A. Heavens, D. Munshi, and P. Serra, arXiv:1001.5026.
  9. Q. G. Huang, Phys. Lett. B 669, 260 (2008).
  10. Q. G. Huang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2008) 005.
  11. K. Enqvist, S. Nurmi, G. Rigopoulos, O. Taanila, and T. Takahashi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2009) 003.
  12. K. Enqvist and T. Takahashi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2009) 001.
  13. K. Enqvist, S. Nurmi, O. Taanila, and T. Takahashi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2010) 009.
  14. K. Enqvist and S. Nurmi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2005) 013.
  15. M. Sasaki, J. Valiviita, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 74, 103003 (2006).
  16. K. Enqvist and T. Takahashi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2008) 012.
  17. Q. G. Huang and Y. Wang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2008) 025.
  18. M. Kawasaki, K. Nakayama, and F. Takahashi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2009) 026.
  19. P. Chingangbam and Q. G. Huang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2009) 031.
  20. H. Assadullahi, J. Valiviita, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D 76, 103003 (2007).
  21. Q. G. Huang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2008) 017.
  22. C. T. Byrnes, S. Nurmi, G. Tasinato, and D. Wands, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2010) 034.
  23. C. T. Byrnes, M. Gerstenlauer, S. Nurmi, G. Tasinato, and D. Wands, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2010) 004.
  24. C. T. Byrnes, K. Enqvist, and T. Takahashi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2010) 026.
  25. Q. G. Huang, arXiv:1009.3326 [J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. (to be published)].
  26. Planck Collaboration arXiv:astro-ph/0604069.
  27. D. Baumann et al. (CMBPol Study Team Collaboration), in CMBPol Mission Concept Study: Probing Inflation with CMB Polarization, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 1141 (AIP, New York, 2009).
  28. E. Sefusatti, M. Liguori, A. P. S. Yadav, M. G. Jackson, and E. Pajer, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2009) 022.
  29. E. Kawakami, M. Kawasaki, K. Nakayama, and F. Takahashi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2009) 002.
  30. T. Matsuda, Phys. Lett. B 682, 163 (2009).
  31. T. Takahashi, M. Yamaguchi, and S. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D 80, 063524 (2009).
  32. K. Nakayama and J. Yokoyama, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2010) 010.
  33. M. Kawasaki, T. Takahashi, and S. Yokoyama, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2009) 012.
  34. Y. F. Cai and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 82, 123501 (2010).
  35. J. A. Adams, G. G. Ross, and S. Sarkar, Nucl. Phys. B503, 405 (1997).
  36. A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett. 42, 152 (1985).
  37. M. Sasaki and E. D. Stewart, Prog. Theor. Phys. 95, 71 (1996).
  38. M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka, Prog. Theor. Phys. 99, 763 (1998).
  39. D. H. Lyth, K. A. Malik, and M. Sasaki, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2005) 004.
  40. D. H. Lyth and Y. Rodriguez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 121302 (2005).
  41. P. Chingangbam and C. Park, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2009) 019.
  42. T. Matsubara, Phys. Rev. D 81, 083505 (2010).
  43. Q. G. Huang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2009) 035.
  44. M. Sasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 120, 159 (2008).
  45. Q. G. Huang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2009) 005.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation