Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Reheating temperature from the CMB

Jakub Mielczarek*

  • Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University, 30-244 Kraków, Orla 171, Poland

  • *jakub.mielczarek@uj.edu.pl

Phys. Rev. D 83, 023502 – Published 4 January, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.023502

Abstract

In the recent paper by Mielczarek et al. (Ref. [8]), an idea of the method which can be used to put some constraint for the reheating phase was proposed. Another method of constraining the reheating temperature has been recently studied by Martin and Ringeval (Ref. [17]). Both methods are based on observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation. In this paper, we develop the idea introduced in this first article to put constraint on the reheating after the slow-roll inflation. We restrict our considerations to the case of a massive inflaton field. The method can be, however, easily extended to the different inflationary scenarios. As a main result, we derive an expression on the reheating temperature TRH. Surprisingly, the obtained equation is independent on the unknown number of relativistic degrees of freedom g* produced during the reheating. Based on this equation and the WMAP 7 observations, we find TRH=3.5×106GeV, which is consistent with the current constraints. The relative uncertainty of the result is, however, very high and equal to σ(TRH)/TRH53. As we show, this uncertainty will be significantly reduced with future CMB experiments.

Article Text

References (20)

  1. L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3195 (1994).
  2. L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D 56, 3258 (1997).
  3. A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981).
  4. B. A. Bassett, S. Tsujikawa, and D. Wands, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 537 (2006).
  5. S. Hannestad, Phys. Rev. D 70, 043506 (2004).
  6. M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. D 62, 023506 (2000).
  7. J. Martin and C. Ringeval, Phys. Rev. D 82, 023511 (2010).
  8. J. Mielczarek, M. Kamionka, A. Kurek, and M. Szydlowski, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2010) 004.
  9. E. Komatsu et al., arXiv:1001.4538.
  10. A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B 91, 99 (1980).
  11. K. Nakayama, S. Saito, Y. Suwa, and J. Yokoyama, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2008) 020.
  12. S. Kuroyanagi, C. Gordon, J. Silk, and N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. D 81, 083524 (2010); 82, 069901(E) (2010).
  13. Planck Collaboration, arXiv:astro-ph/0604069.
  14. M. D. Niemack et al., SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 7741, 77411S (2010).
  15. J. Dunkley et al., in CMBPol Mission Concept Study: Prospects for Polarized Foreground Removal, 1141, 222 (AIP, New York, 2009.
  16. S. Galli, M. Martinelli, A. Melchiorri, L. Pagano, B. D. Sherwin, and D. N. Spergel, Phys. Rev. D 82, 123504 (2010).
  17. M. Yu. Khlopov and A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. B 138, 265 (1984).
  18. M. Yu. Khlopov, Cosmoparticle physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999).
  19. R. Kallosh, L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. Van Proeyen, Phys. Rev. D 61, 103503 (2000).
  20. M. Y. Khlopov, A. Barrau, and J. Grain, Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 1875 (2006).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation