Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Remarks on the mass-angular momentum relations for two extreme Kerr sources in equilibrium

I. Cabrera-Munguia1, V. S. Manko1, and E. Ruiz2

  • 1Departamento de Física, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, A.P. 14-740, 07000 México D.F., Mexico
  • 2Instituto Universitario de Física Fundamental y Matemáticas, Universidad de Salamanca, 37008 Salamanca, Spain

Phys. Rev. D 82, 124042 – Published 20 December, 2010Erratum Phys. Rev. D 83, 129902 (2011)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.124042

Abstract

The general analysis of the relations between masses and angular momenta in the configurations composed of two balancing extremal Kerr particles is made on the basis of two exact solutions arising as extreme limits of the well-known double-Kerr spacetime. We show that the inequality M2|J| characteristic of an isolated Kerr black hole is verified by all the extremal components of the Tomimatsu and Dietz-Hoenselaers solutions. At the same time, the inequality can be violated by the total masses and total angular momenta of these binary systems, and we identify all the cases when such violation occurs.

Erratum

Article Text

References (23)

  1. S. Dain and O. E. Ortiz, Phys. Rev. D 80, 024045 (2009).
  2. R. P. Kerr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237 (1963).
  3. C. Hoenselaers, Prog. Theor. Phys. 72, 761 (1984).
  4. V. S. Manko and E. Ruiz, Classical Quantum Gravity 18, L11 (2001).
  5. D. Kramer and G. Neugebauer, Phys. Lett. 75A, 259 (1980).
  6. A. Komar, Phys. Rev. 113, 934 (1959).
  7. A. Tomimatsu, Prog. Theor. Phys. 70, 385 (1983).
  8. F. J. Ernst, Phys. Rev. 167, 1175 (1968).
  9. W. Dietz and C. Hoenselaers, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 165, 319 (1985).
  10. W. Kinnersley and D. M. Chitre, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 19, 2037 (1978).
  11. Z. Perjés, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 30, 2197 (1989).
  12. A. Tomimatsu and H. Sato, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1344 (1972); Prog. Theor. Phys. 50, 95 (1973).
  13. M. Yamazaki, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 18, 2502 (1977).
  14. M. Yamazaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 63, 1950 (1980).
  15. R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, Phys. Rev. 122, 997 (1961).
  16. V. S. Manko, E. Ruiz, and J. D. Sanabria-Gómez, Classical Quantum Gravity 17, 3881 (2000).
  17. V. S. Manko and E. Ruiz, Classical Quantum Gravity 19, 3077 (2002).
  18. J. E. Economou and F. J. Ernst, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 17, 52 (1976).
  19. I. Cabrera-Munguia, V. S. Manko, and E. Ruiz, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 19, 3077 (2010).
  20. R. Geroch, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 11, 2580 (1970).
  21. R. O. Hansen, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 15, 46 (1974).
  22. D. Fodor, C. Hoenselaers, and Z. Perjés, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 30, 2252 (1989).
  23. V. S. Manko, E. Ruiz, and O. V. Manko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5504 (2000).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation