Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Generalized superradiant scattering

Mauricio Richartz1, Silke Weinfurtner1,2, A. J. Penner1, and W. G. Unruh1

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z1 Canada
  • 2Astrophysics Sector, International School for Advanced Studies, Via Beirut 2-4, 34014 Trieste, Italy and INFN, Sezione di Trieste, Italy USA

Phys. Rev. D 80, 124016 – Published 11 December, 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.124016

Abstract

We analyze the necessary and sufficient conditions for the occurrence of superradiance. Starting with a wave equation we examine the possibility of superradiance in terms of an effective potential and boundary conditions. In particular, we show that the existence of an ergoregion is not sufficient; an appropriate boundary condition, e.g. only ingoing group velocity waves at an event horizon, is also crucial. After applying our scheme to the standard examples of superradiance, we show that analogue models of gravity without an event horizon do not necessarily exhibit superradiance. Particularly, we show that the superradiant phenomenon is absent in purely rotating inviscid fluids with vorticity. We argue that there should be a catalogue of superradiant systems that can be found by focusing on the necessary and sufficient conditions outlined below.

Article Text

References (19)

  1. C. A. Manogue, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 181, 261 (1988).
  2. A. A. Starobinskii, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 64, 48 (1973) [Sov. Phys. JETP 37, 28 (1973)].
  3. A. A. Starobinskij and S. M. Churilov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 65, 3 (1973) [Sov. Phys. JETP 38, 1 (1974)].
  4. Y. B. Zel’Dovich, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 62, 2076 (1972) [Sov. Phys. JETP 35, 1085 (1972)].
  5. J. D. Bekenstein and M. Schiffer, Phys. Rev. D 58, 064014 (1998).
  6. S. Lepe and J. Saavedra, Phys. Lett. B 617, 174 (2005).
  7. T. R. Slatyer and C. M. Savage, Classical Quantum Gravity 22, 3833 (2005).
  8. The physical interpretation of Eq. (5) depends on the system we are analyzing. For example, for a Klein–Gordon field, the Wronskian iW(f,f*) can be interpreted as a particle current in the ξ direction.

  9. I. Semiz, Phys. Rev. D 45, 532 (1992).
  10. R. Wald, General Relativity (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984).
  11. Notice that, if |T|<|Y|, one would obtain |R|>1 for sufficiently large frequencies ω>mΩh+eΦh. This should not be called superradiance since |T|<|Y| corresponds to the scattering of the wave with a source.

  12. G. Kang, Phys. Rev. D 55, 7563 (1997).
  13. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Mechanics (Pergamon, New York, 1976), 3rd ed..
  14. C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Living Rev. Relativity 8, 12 (2005), http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2005-12.
  15. S. Basak and P. Majumdar, Classical Quantum Gravity 20, 3907 (2003).
  16. S. Basak and P. Majumdar, Classical Quantum Gravity 20, 2929 (2003).
  17. E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D 70, 124006 (2004).
  18. The absence of superradiance for rotating acoustic black holes (with |R|<1) has been derived in [6]. However the assumption to requiring only ingoing waves near the ergoregion (which were defined using the phase velocity instead of the group velocity) is unclear to the present authors.

  19. S. E. Perez Bergliaffa, K. Hibberd, M. Stone, and M. Visser, Physica D (Amsterdam) 191, 121 (2004).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation