- Access by Xinjiang University
Lorentz symmetry breaking as a quantum field theory regulator
Phys. Rev. D 80, 025011 – Published 23 July, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.025011
Abstract
Perturbative expansions of quantum field theories typically lead to ultraviolet (short-distance) divergences requiring regularization and renormalization. Many different regularization techniques have been developed over the years, but most regularizations require severe mutilation of the logical foundations of the theory. In contrast, breaking Lorentz invariance, while it is certainly a radical step, at least does not damage the logical foundations of the theory. I shall explore the features of a Lorentz symmetry breaking regulator in a simple polynomial scalar field theory and discuss its implications. In particular, I shall quantify just “how much” Lorentz symmetry breaking is required to fully regulate the quantum theory and render it finite. This scalar field theory provides a simple way of understanding many of the key features of Hořava’s recent article [Phys. Rev. D 79, 084008 (2009)] on dimensional quantum gravity.
Article Text
References (28)
See, for instance, the famous (infamous?) comment by Paul Dirac: “I must say that I am very dissatisfied with the situation because this so-called ‘good theory’ does involve neglecting infinities which appear in its equations, neglecting them in an arbitrary way. This is just not sensible mathematics. Sensible mathematics involves neglecting a quantity when it is small—not neglecting it just because it is infinitely great and you do not want it"!
- S. S. Schweber, An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory (Harper and Row, New York, 1962).
- K. Nishijima, Fields and Particles: Field Theory and Dispersion Relations (Benjamin, New York, 1969).
- P. Ramond, Field Theory: A Modern Primer (Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, 1981).
- R. J. Rivers, Path Integral Methods in Quantum Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1988).
- S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995), Vol 1.
- S. Mandelstam, Nucl. Phys. B213, 149 (1983).
- Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, L. J. Dixon, H. Johansson, and R. Roiban, Phys. Rev. D 78, 105019 (2008); Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, D. Forde, H. Ita, and H. Johansson, 77, 025010 (2008).
- R. Kallosh, arXiv:0903.4630.
- D. Mattingly, Living Rev. Relativity 8, 5 (2005), http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2005-5/.
- V. A. Kostelecky and N. Russell, arXiv:0801.0287.
- CPT and Lorentz Symmetry I, edited by V. A. Kostelecky (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999); CPT and Lorentz Symmetry II, edited by V. A. Kostelecky (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002); CPT and Lorentz Symmetry III, edited by V. A. Kostelecky (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005); CPT and Lorentz Symmetry IV, edited by V. A. Kostelecky (World Scientific, Singapore, 2008).
- T. Jacobson, S. Liberati, and D. Mattingly, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 321, 150 (2006); T. A. Jacobson, S. Liberati, D. Mattingly, and F. W. Stecker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 021101 (2004); T. Jacobson, S. Liberati, and D. Mattingly, Nature (London) 424, 1019 (2003).
- J. R. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, D. V. Nanopoulos, A. S. Sakharov, and E. K. G. Sarkisyan, Astropart. Phys. 25, 402 (2006); 25, 158 (2008).
- Q. G. Bailey and V. A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. D 74, 045001 (2006).
- J. Albert et al. (MAGIC Collaboration and other contributors), Phys. Lett. B 668, 253 (2008).
- T. Katori, V. A. Kostelecky, and R. Tayloe, Phys. Rev. D 74, 105009 (2006).
- P. Hořava, Phys. Rev. D 79, 084008 (2009).
- D. Anselmi and M. Halat, Phys. Rev. D 76, 125011 (2007); D. Anselmi, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2008) 051; Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 324, 874 (2009); 324, 1058 (2009); Phys. Rev. D 79, 025017 (2009).
- B. Simon, The Euclidean (Quantum) Field Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1974).
- J. Glimm and A. Jaffe, Quantum Physics: A Functional Integral Point of View (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987).
- D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecky, Phys. Rev. D 58, 116002 (1998); V. A. Kostelecky and R. Lehnert, 63, 065008 (2001); V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, 39, 683 (1989).
- T. G. Pavlopoulos, Phys. Rev. 159, 1106 (1967).
- J. Collins, A. Perez, D. Sudarsky, L. Urrutia, and H. Vucetich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 191301 (2004).
- S. Chadha and H. B. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B217, 125 (1983); H. B. Nielsen and I. Picek, B211, 269 (1983); B242, 542 (1984); J. L. Chkareuli, C. D. Froggatt, and H. B. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 091601 (2001); C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen, arXiv:hep-ph/0211106.
- M. Visser, C. Barceló, and S. Liberati, arXiv:hep-th/0109033; S. Liberati, M. Visser, and S. Weinfurtner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 151301 (2006); Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 3129 (2006); S. Weinfurtner, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Lect. Notes Phys. 718, 115 (2007); J. Phys. A 39, 6807 (2006); J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 33, 373 (2006).
- C. Barceló, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Living Rev. Relativity 8, 12 (2005), http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2005-12/; M. Visser, Classical Quantum Gravity 15, 1767 (1998); arXiv:gr-qc/9311028.
- S. Weinfurtner, P. Jain, M. Visser, and C. W. Gardiner, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 065012 (2009). See especially Eq. (120) in Sec. III.B, and surrounding discussion. S. Weinfurtner, A. White, and M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D 76, 124008 (2007). See especially Sec. V. A. White, S. Weinfurtner, and M. Visser, arXiv:0812.3744. See especially Sec. 7. S. Weinfurtner, A. White, and M. Visser, arXiv:0905.4530.