Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Double Beta Decay and ΔQ=2 Currents

Donald Smith and Charles Picciotto

Douglas Bryman

  • Department of Physics, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

  • Tri-University Meson Facility, Department of Physics, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Phys. Rev. D 8, 342 – Published 1 July, 1973

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.8.342

Abstract

We present a calculation of double beta decay using a model that is consistent with the Konopinski-Mahmoud lepton-number-conservation scheme. In the model used, the decay occurs via a ΔQ=2 interaction N*N+μ+e followed by the decay μeν¯eνμ. We conclude that although similar models incorporating ΔQ=2 currents may deal adequately with hypothetical processes in which there are no competing mechanisms, this model does not properly explain two-neutrino double beta decay, which may occur through more conventional channels.

Original Article

Lepton-Number and Chirality Nonconservation in Weak Processes

H. Primakoff and S. P. Rosen
Phys. Rev. D 5, 1784 (1972)

References (16)

  1. H. Primakoff and S. P. Rosen, Phys. Rev. D 5, 1784 (1972)
  2. E. J. Konopinski and H. M. Mahmoud, Phys. Rev. 92, 1045 (1953)
  3. S. P. Rosen and H. Primakoff, in Alpha-, Beta-, and Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy, edited by K. Siegbahn (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965), Vol. II T. D. Lee and C. S. Wu, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 15, 381 (1965)
  4. E. J. Konopinski, Theory of Beta Radioactivity (Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1966)
  5. H. Primakoff and S. P. Rosen, Rep. Prog. Phys. 22, 121 (1959)
  6. N. Takaoka and K. Ogata, Z. Naturforsch. 21A, 84 (1966)
  7. B. Pontecorvo, Phys. Lett. 26B, 630 (1968)
  8. H. Primakoff and S. P. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 184, 1925 (1969)
  9. B. Pontecorvo, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 53, 1717 (1967) [Sov. Phys.-JETP 26, 984 (1968)]
  10. L. S. Kisslinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 998 (1971)
  11. M. D. Shuster and M. Rho, Phys. Lett. 42B, 45 (1972)
  12. D. A. Bryman, M. Blecher, K. Gotow, and R. J. Powers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1469 (1972)
  13. E. W. Beier, D. A. Buchholz, A. K. Mann, and S. H. Parker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 678 (1972)
  14. A. K. Kerman and L. S. Kisslinger, Phys. Rev. 180, 1483 (1969) J. S. Vincent et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 236 (1970) H. Arenhövel, M. Danos, and H. T. Williams, Phys. Lett. 31B, 109 (1970)
  15. T. Kirsten, O. A. Schaeffer, E. Norton, and R. W. Stoenner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1300 (1968) T. Kirsten, W. Gentner, and O. A. Schaeffer, Z. Physik 202, 273 (1967)
  16. R. K. Bardin, P. J. Gollon, J. D. Ullman, and C. S. Wu, Phys. Lett. 26B, 112 (1967)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation