Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Properties of a Single-Peripheral Model of the Deck Effect

Ying-Yeung Yam

  • Department of Physics, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185

Phys. Rev. D 8, 1572 – Published 1 September, 1973

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.8.1572

Abstract

The properties of a single-peripheral model of the Deck effect are presented as a proto-type diffraction-dissociation process, using πNπρN as an example. The πρ mass spectrum, angular distributions, and the NN momentum-transfer distribution are investigated. We evaluate the effects on these distributions due to three major components of the model, namely, the dissociation vertex, the propagation, and the diffraction scattering of the virtual particle. It is found that many "expected" properties (usually derived for asymptotic energies) of the diffraction-dissociation process do not obtain at finite energies. In particular, there is considerably more structure in the momentum-transfer and angular distributions. The mass dependence in the momentum-transfer slope found by others is reproduced in this model. Structure in the angular distributions is seen to imply some uncertainty over tests of helicity conservation for A1 production. The peak in the mass spectrum (the Deck effect) is found to have an undesirable dependence on incident momentum. This difficulty is traced to the presence of spin in the model. Explicit numerical calculations and qualitative considerations lead us to believe that many Reggeized calculations of the Deck effect share the same difficulty. Their prediction of a sharp and s-independent peak is unjustified due to neglect of external spin.

References (47)

  1. M. L. Good and W. D. Walker, Phys. Rev. 120, 1857 (1960)
  2. D. R. O. Morrison, Phys. Lett. 22, 528 (1966)
  3. Particle Data Group, Phys. Lett. 39B, 1 (1972)
  4. R. T. Deck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 169 (1964) U. Maor, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 41, 456 (1967)
  5. M. Ross and Y. Y. Yam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 546 (1967)
  6. J. Gillespie, Final State Interactions (Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1964) M. M. Islam [Phys. Rev. 131, 2292 (1963)] J. G. Rushbrooke [ 177, 2357 (1969)]
  7. E. L. Berger, Phys. Rev. 166, 1525 (1968) [3]
  8. G. W. Brandenburg et al., Nucl. Phys. B16, 369 (1970) [3]
  9. G. Chew and A. Pignotti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1078 (1968)
  10. R. Dolen, D. Horn and C. Schmid, Phys. Rev. 166, 1768 (1968) G. Veneziano, Nuovo Cimento 57A, 190 (1968)
  11. J. Pumplin, Phys. Rev. D 7, 795 (1973)
  12. D. Cohen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1601 (1972)
  13. S. Pokorski and H. Satz, Nucl. Phys. B19, 113 (1970) Aachen-Berlin-CERN-London-Vienna collaboration, ibid. B24, 221 (1970) G. Kramer and H. R. Quinn, ibid. B27, 77 (1971)
  14. G. Wolf, Phys. Rev. 183, 1538 (1969)
  15. B.-L. Young, J. T. Donohue, and R. F. Peierls, Phys. Rev. D 3, 2801 (1971)
  16. F. Gilman, J. Pumplin, A. Schwimmer, and L. Stodolsky, Phys. Lett. 31B, 387 (1970)
  17. G. Cohen-Tannoudji, G. Kane, and C. Quigg [Nucl. Phys. B37, 77 (1972)]
  18. H. P. Dürr and H. Pilkuhn, Nuovo Cimento 40A, 899 (1965)
  19. J. C. Vander Velde et al. [Univ. of Michigan report 1971 (unpublished)]
  20. J. D. Jackson and H. Pilkuhn, Nuovo Cimento 33, 906 (1964)
  21. J. Benecke and H. P. Dürr, Nuovo Cimento 56A, 269 (1969)
  22. Omitted endnote

  23. K. J. Foley et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 425 (1963) Aachen-Berlin-Bonn-Hamburg-Heidelberg-München collaboration, Phys. Rev. 175, 1669 (1968)
  24. L. Stodolsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 973 (1967)
  25. A. H. Rosenfeld in Proceedings of the Oxford International Conference on Elementary Particles, 1965, edited by T. Walsh (Rutherford High Energy Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Berkshire, England, 1966)
  26. B. Y. Oh and W. D. Walker, Phys. Lett. 28B, 564 (1969)
  27. I. M. Blair et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 789 (1966) K. J. Foley et al., 19, 397 (1967)
  28. [3] Aachen-Berlin-CERN collaboration, Nucl. Phys. B8, 45 (1968)
  29. M. Elitzur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 895 (1971)
  30. Elitzur ([29]) [27]
  31. Omitted endnote

  32. E. L. Berger, Phys. Rev. 179, 1567 (1969)
  33. R. E. Waltz, Phys. Lett. 30B, 490 (1969) S. Pokorski, M. Szeptycka, and A. Zieminski, Nuovo Cimento 69A, 290 (1970)
  34. Orsay-Milan-Saclay-Berkeley collaboration, Nuovo Cimento 46A, 737 (1966)]
  35. K. Gottfried and J. D. Jackson, Nuovo Cimento 33, 309 (1964)
  36. Aachen-Berlin-Bonn-CERN-Cracow-Heidelberg-London-Vienna collaboration, Phys. Lett. 34B, 160 (1971)
  37. [32] [43]
  38. ([14]), J. Ballam et al., [Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 934 (1968)] G. W. Brandenburg et al. [Nucl. Phys. B16, 287 (1970)] C. D. Froggatt and G. Ranft [Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 943 (1969)], [9]
  39. Omitted endnote

  40. Omitted endnote

  41. Omitted endnote

  42. J. D. Jackson in Rev. Mod. Phys. 37, 484 (1965)
  43. N. M. Carson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 880 (1967) G. Fraser and R. Roberts, Nuovo Cimento 47A, 293 (1967) G. W. Brandenburg et al., [8] J. A. Gaido et al., Nucl. Phys. B23, 84 (1970)
  44. K. Gottfired and J. D. Jackson, Nuovo Cimento 34, 735 (1964)
  45. G. W. Brandenburg et al., [8]
  46. J. C. Park et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 171 (1968)
  47. F. Bomse et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1519 (1968)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation