Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Comparison of the Parton and Generalized Vector-Dominance Analyses of Deep-Inelastic Electron-Nucleon Scattering

Jean Pestieau*

Jesús Urías†,‡

  • Institut de Physique Théorique, Université de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

  • Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico 14, D.F.

  • *Postal address: Chemin du Cyclotron, 2, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
  • Postal address: Apartado Postal 14-740, México, 14, D.F.
  • Work supported in part by CONACyT (México).

Phys. Rev. D 8, 1552 – Published 1 September, 1973

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.8.1552

Abstract

It is shown that, while generalized vector dominance is strictly applicable in the diffractive limit (ν, any Q20 such that xQ22Mν0) of electron-nucleon scattering and the parton model is applicable in the scaling limit (Q2, x fixed), these two models are identical for describing the deep diffractive limit (Q2, x0). This equivalence is then used to interpret the different contributions of vector hadronic states which couple to the photon. A new scaling variable x̃ comes out naturally from our analysis.

References (15)

  1. J. J. Sakurai and D. Schildknecht, Phys. Lett. 40B, 121 (1972) 41B, 489 (1972) 42B, 216 (1972) A. Bramón, E. Etim and M. Greco, 41B, 609 (1972)
  2. G. Miller, et al., Phys. Rev. D 5, 528 (1972) E. D. Bloom et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 930 (1969) M. R. Sogard, in Proceedings of the XVI International Conference on High Energy Physics, National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Ill., 1972, edited by J. D. Jackson and A. Roberts (NAL, Batavia, Ill., 1973), Vol. 2, p. 98
  3. [4]
  4. S. J. Brodsky, F. E. Close, and J. F. Gunion, Phys. Rev. D 6, 177 (1972)
  5. P. V. Landshoff, J. C. Polkinghorne, and R. D. Short, Nucl. Phys. B28, 225 (1971)
  6. R. L. Jaffe, Phys. Lett. 37B, 517 (1971) Phys. Rev. D 5, 2622 (1972)
  7. J. C. Polkinghorne, Nuovo Cimento 8A, 592 (1972) C. Nash, 9A, 300 (1972)
  8. R. Jackiw, R. Van Royen, and G. West, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2473 (1970)
  9. Y. Frishman, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 66, 373 (1971)
  10. R. L. Jaffe, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 75, 545 (1973)
  11. F. E. Close and J. F. Gunion, Phys. Rev. D 4, 742 (1971) 4, 1576 (1971) M. Breidenbach and J. Kuti, Phys. Lett. 41B, 345 (1972) J. Pestieau, Phys. Rev. D 6, 1449 (1972)
  12. E. D. Bloom and F. J. Gilman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 1140 (1970) Phys. Rev. D 4, 2901 (1971)
  13. V. Rittenberg and H. R. Rubinstein, Phys. Lett. 35B, 50 (1971) F. W. Brasse et al., Nucl. Phys. B39, 421 (1972)
  14. J. D. Bjorken and S. F. Tuan, Comments Nucl. Part. Phys. 5, 71 (1972) J. J. Sakurai, H. B. Thacker, and S. F. Tuan, Nucl. Phys. B48, 353 (1972) J. Pestieau and J. J. Salazar, Nuovo Cimento Lett. 5, 735 (1972) 6, 351 (1973)
  15. R. L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. D 6, 716 (1972)

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation