Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Joint description of the e+e annihilation into both four-pion channels

Josef Juráň1 and Peter Lichard1,2

  • 1Institute of Physics, Silesian University in Opava, Bezručovo náměstí 13, 746 01 Opava, Czech Republic
  • 2Institute of Experimental and Applied Physics, Czech Technical University, Horská 3/a, 120 00 Prague, Czech Republic

Phys. Rev. D 78, 017501 – Published 7 July, 2008

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.017501

Abstract

The e+eπ+ππ0π0 reaction cross section as a function of the incident energy is calculated using a model that is an extension of our recently published model of the e+e annihilation into four charged pions. The latter considered the intermediate states with the π, ρ, and a1 mesons and fixed the mixing angle of the a1ρπ Lagrangian and other parameters by fitting the cross section data. Here we supplement the original intermediate states with those containing ω(782) and h1(1170), but keep unchanged the values of those parameters that enter both charged and mixed channel calculations. The inclusion of ω is vital for obtaining a good fit to the cross section data, while the intermediate states with h1 further improve it. Finally, we merge our models of the e+eπ+ππ0π0 and e+eπ+ππ+π reactions and obtain a simultaneous good fit.

Article Text

References (29)

  1. F. M. Renard, Nuovo Cimento A 64, 979 (1969).
  2. R. Decker, P. Heiliger, H. H. Jonsson, and M. Finkemeier, Z. Phys. C 70, 247 (1996).
  3. N. N. Achasov and A. A. Kozhevnikov, Phys. Rev. D 61, 077904 (2000); 62, 056011 (2000).
  4. H. Czyż and J. H. Kühn, Eur. Phys. J. C 18, 497 (2001).
  5. G. Ecker and R. Unterdorfer, Eur. Phys. J. C 24, 535 (2002); Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 121, 175 (2003).
  6. P. Lichard, Acta Phys. Slovaca 49, 215 (1999).
  7. P. Lichard and J. Juráň, Phys. Rev. D 76, 094030 (2007).
  8. A. Bramon, A. Grau, and G. Pancheri, Phys. Lett. B 317, 190 (1993).
  9. S. I. Eidelman, Z. K. Silagadze, and E. A. Kuraev, Phys. Lett. B 346, 186 (1995).
  10. R. S. Plant and M. C. Birse, Phys. Lett. B 365, 292 (1996).
  11. N. N. Achasov and A. A. Kozhevnikov, Phys. Rev. D 71, 034015 (2005); Yad. Fiz. 69, 314 (2006) [Phys. At. Nucl. 69, 293 (2006)].
  12. R. R. Akhmetshin et al., Phys. Lett. B 466, 392 (1999).
  13. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 71, 052001 (2005).
  14. V. P. Druzhinin, arXiv:0710.3455.
  15. M. N. Achasov et al., Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 123, 899 (2003) [JETP 96, 789 (2003)].
  16. A. Petzold (BABAR Collaboration), Report No. SLAC-PUB-12844, 2007.
  17. I. B. Logashenko, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 162, 13 (2006).
  18. A. Denig (private communication).
  19. S. I. Eidelman (private communication).
  20. S. U. Chung et al. (BNL/E852 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 65, 072001 (2002).
  21. R. Kokoski and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 35, 907 (1987).
  22. J. Wess and B. B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. 37B, 95 (1971); E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B223, 422 (1983).
  23. M. Bando, T. Fujiwara, and K. Yamawaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 79, 1140 (1988); M. Bando, T. Kugo, and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rep. 164, 217 (1988).
  24. E. A. Kuraev and Z. K. Silagadze, Phys. Lett. B 292, 377 (1992).
  25. P. Lichard, Phys. Rev. D 49, 5812 (1994).
  26. W.-M. Yao et al., J. Phys. G 33, 1 (2006).
  27. P. Lichard, Phys. Rev. D 60, 053007 (1999).
  28. S. Gao and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C 57, 254 (1998).
  29. J. Ruppert, C. Gale, T. Renk, P. Lichard, and J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 162301 (2008).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation