Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Solar system and equivalence principle constraints on f(R) gravity by the chameleon approach

Salvatore Capozziello1 and Shinji Tsujikawa2

  • 1Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche and INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Universita di Napoli Federico II, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, Edificio G, Via Cinthia, I-80126 Napoli, Italy
  • 2Department of Physics, Gunma National College of Technology, Gunma 371-8530, Japan

Phys. Rev. D 77, 107501 – Published 8 May, 2008

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.107501

Abstract

We study constraints on f(R) dark energy models from solar system experiments combined with experiments on the violation of the equivalence principle. When the mass of an equivalent scalar field degree of freedom is heavy in a region with high density, a spherically symmetric body has a thin shell so that an effective coupling of the fifth force is suppressed through a chameleon mechanism. We place experimental bounds on the cosmologically viable models recently proposed in the literature that have an asymptotic form f(R)=RλRc[1(Rc/R)2n] in the regime RRc. From the solar system constraints on the post-Newtonian parameter γ, we derive the bound n>0.5, whereas the constraints from the violations of the weak and strong equivalence principles give the bound n>0.9. This allows a possibility to find the deviation from the Λ-cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model. For the model f(R)=RλRc(R/Rc)p with 0<p<1 the severest constraint is found to be p<1010, which shows that this model is hardly distinguishable from the ΛCDM cosmology.

Article Text

References (26)

  1. A. G. Riess et al., Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998); S. Perlmutter et al., Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999).
  2. S. Cole et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 362, 505 (2005); M. Tegmark et al., Phys. Rev. D 74, 123507 (2006).
  3. D. N. Spergel et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 148, 175 (2003).
  4. E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1753 (2006); S. Capozziello and M. Francaviglia, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 357 (2008).
  5. S. Capozziello, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11, 483 (2002); S. Capozziello, S. Carloni, and A. Troisi, Recent Res. Dev. Astron. Astrophys. 1, 625 (2003); S. Capozziello et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 12, 1969 (2003); S. M. Carroll et al., Phys. Rev. D 70, 043528 (2004); S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, 68, 123512 (2003).
  6. A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. 91B, 99 (1980).
  7. L. Amendola et al., Phys. Rev. D 75, 083504 (2007).
  8. A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett. 86, 157 (2007).
  9. B. Li and J. D. Barrow, Phys. Rev. D 75, 084010 (2007).
  10. L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Lett. B 660, 125 (2008).
  11. W. Hu and I. Sawicki, Phys. Rev. D 76, 064004 (2007).
  12. S. A. Appleby and R. A. Battye, Phys. Lett. B 654, 7 (2007).
  13. S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 77, 023507 (2008).
  14. I. Navarro and K. Van Acoleyen, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2007) 022.
  15. S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B 652, 343 (2007).
  16. S. Tsujikawa, K. Uddin, and R. Tavakol, Phys. Rev. D 77, 043007 (2008).
  17. J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171104 (2004); Phys. Rev. D 69, 044026 (2004).
  18. K. i. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 39, 3159 (1989).
  19. T. Faulkner et al., Phys. Rev. D 76, 063505 (2007).
  20. C. M. Will, Living Rev. Relativity 9, 3 (2006).
  21. A. D. Dolgov and M. Kawasaki, Phys. Lett. B 573, 1 (2003).
  22. R. Bean et al., Phys. Rev. D 75, 064020 (2007); Y. S. Song, W. Hu, and I. Sawicki, 75, 044004 (2007); I. Sawicki and W. Hu, 75, 127502 (2007).
  23. L. Amendola, D. Polarski, and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 131302 (2007).
  24. J. K. Hoskins et al., Phys. Rev. D 32, 3084 (1985).
  25. J. Mester et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 18, 2475 (2001).
  26. A. Vecchiato et al., Astron. Astrophys. 399, 337 (2003).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation