Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Relation between light cone distribution amplitudes and shape function in B mesons

A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, and J.-C. Raynal

  • Laboratoire de Physique Théorique* Université de Paris XI, Bâtiment 210, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France

  • *Unité Mixte de Recherche UMR 8627-CNRS

Phys. Rev. D 77, 034005 – Published 4 February, 2008

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.034005

Abstract

The Bakamjian-Thomas relativistic quark model provides a Poincaré representation of bound states with a fixed number of constituents and, in the heavy quark limit, form factors of currents satisfy covariance and Isgur-Wise scaling. We compute the light cone distribution amplitudes (LCDA) of B mesons φ±B(ω) as well as the shape function S(ω), that enters in the decay BXsγ, that are also covariant in this class of models. The LCDA and the shape function are related through the quark model wave function. The former satisfy, in the limit of vanishing constituent light quark mass, the integral relation given by QCD in the valence sector of Fock space. Using a Gaussian wave function, the obtained S(ω) is identical to the so-called roman shape function. From the parameters for the latter that fit the BXsγ spectrum we predict the behavior of φ±B(ω). We discuss the important role played by the constituent light quark mass. In particular, although φB(0)0 for vanishing light quark mass, a nonvanishing mass implies the unfamiliar result φB(0)=0. Moreover, we incorporate the short distance behavior of QCD to φ+B(ω), which has sizeable effects at large ω. We obtain the values for the parameters Λ¯0.35GeV and λB11.43GeV1. We compare with other theoretical approaches and illustrate the great variety of models found in the literature for the functions φ±B(ω); hence the necessity of imposing further constraints as in the present paper. We briefly review also the different phenomena that are sensitive to the LCDA. The value that we find for λB1 fulfills the upper bound recently measured by BABAR.

Article Text

References (39)

  1. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, arXiv:hep-ph/0006124; Nucl. Phys. B591, 313 (2000).
  2. A. G. Grozin and M. Neubert, arXiv:hep-ph/9607366; Phys. Rev. D 55, 272 (1997).
  3. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, arXiv:hep-ph/0104110; Nucl. Phys. B606, 245 (2001).
  4. A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, and N. Offen, arXiv:hep-ph/0504091; Phys. Lett. B 620, 52 (2005); arXiv:hep-ph/0611193; Phys. Rev. D 75, 054013 (2007).
  5. G. P. Korchemsky, D. Pirjol, and T.-M. Yan, arXiv:hep-ph/9911427; Phys. Rev. D 61, 114510 (2000).
  6. S. Descotes-Genon and C. T. Sachrajda, arXiv:hep-ph/0209216; Nucl. Phys. B650, 356 (2003).
  7. V. M. Braun, D. Y. Ivanov, and G. P. Korchemsky, arXiv:hep-ph/0309330; Phys. Rev. D 69, 034014 (2004).
  8. P. Ball and E. Kou, arXiv:hep-ph/0301135; J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2003) 029.
  9. S. J. Lee and M. Neubert, arXiv:hep-ph/0509350; Phys. Rev. D 72, 094028 (2005).
  10. B. Bakamjian and L. H. Thomas, Phys. Rev. 92, 1300 (1953).
  11. B. D. Keister and W. N. Polyzou, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 20, 225 (1991).
  12. M. Terent’ev, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 24, 106 (1976).
  13. F. Cardarelli, I. L. Grach, I. M. Nadoretskii, E. Pace, G. Sale, and S. Simula, Phys. Lett. B 332, 1 (1994).
  14. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pène, and J.-C. Raynal, Phys. Lett. B 365, 319 (1996).
  15. N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D 43, 819 (1991).
  16. V. Morénas, A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pène, and J.-C. Raynal, Phys. Rev. D 56, 5668 (1997).
  17. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pène, and J.-C. Raynal, Phys. Lett. B 386, 304 (1996).
  18. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pène, J.-C. Raynal, and V. Morénas, Phys. Lett. B 520, 25 (2001).
  19. A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, and J.-C. Raynal, arXiv:hep-ph/0210233; Phys. Rev. D 67, 114009 (2003); Phys. Lett. B 557, 207 (2003).
  20. G. Altarelli et al., Nucl. Phys. B208, 365 (1982).
  21. I. Bigi, M. Shifman, N. Uraltsev, and A. Vainshtein, arXiv:hep-ph/9402225; Phys. Lett. B 328, 431 (1994).
  22. T. Mannel and M. Neubert, arXiv:hep-ph/9402288; Phys. Rev. D 50, 2037 (1994).
  23. S. W. Bosch, B. O. Lange, M. Neubert, and G. Paz, arXiv:hep-ph/0402094; Nucl. Phys. B699, 335 (2004).
  24. S. W. Bosch, M. Neubert, and G. Paz, arXiv:hep-ph/0409115; J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2004) 073.
  25. B. O. Lange, M. Neubert, and G. Paz, arXiv:hep-ph/0504071; Phys. Rev. D 72, 073006 (2005).
  26. A. Limosani and T. Nozaki (Belle Collaboration for the Heavy Flavor Averaging Group), arXiv:hep-ex/0407052.
  27. S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 32, 189 (1985).
  28. V. Morénas, A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pène, and J.-C. Raynal, Phys. Lett. B 386, 315 (1996).
  29. V. Morénas, A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pène, and J.-C. Raynal, Phys. Rev. D 58, 114019 (1998).
  30. M. Beneke and T. Feldman, Nucl. Phys. B592, 3 (2001).
  31. H. Kawamura, J. Kodaira, C. F. Qiao, and K. Tanaka, arXiv:hep-ph/0109181; H. Kawamura,J. KodairaC. F. QiaoK. TanakaPhys. Lett. B 523, 111 (2001); 536, 344(E) (2002).
  32. P. Koppenburg et al. (Belle Collaboration), arXiv:hep-ex/0403004; Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 061803 (2004).
  33. M. Neubert, arXiv:hep-ph/0412241; Phys. Lett. B 612, 13 (2005); arXiv:hep-ph/0506245; Phys. Rev. D 72, 074025 (2005).
  34. V. Lubicz, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 94, 116 (2001).
  35. Y.-Y. Keum, H. L. Li, and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Lett. B 504, 6 (2001).
  36. Y.-Y. Keum, H. L. Li, and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Rev. D 63, 054008 (2001).
  37. Y.-Y. Keum and H. L. Li, Phys. Rev. D 63, 074006 (2001).
  38. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), arXiv:0704.1478.
  39. A. F. Falk and M. Neubert, Phys. Rev. D 47, 2965 (1993).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation