Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Nonet symmetry in η, η and BKη,Kη decays

T. N. Pham

  • Centre de Physique Théorique, CNRS Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, Cedex, France

Phys. Rev. D 77, 014024 – Published 24 January, 2008Erratum Phys. Rev. D 77, 019905 (2008)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.014024

Abstract

The nonet symmetry scheme seems to describe rather well the masses and ηη mixing angle of the ground state pseudoscalar mesons. It is expected that nonet symmetry should also be valid for the matrix elements of the pseudoscalar density operators which play an important role in charmless two-body B decays with η or η in the final state. Starting from the divergences of the SU(3) octet and singlet axial vector currents, we show that nonet symmetry for the pseudoscalar mass term implies nonet symmetry for the pseudoscalar density operators. In this nonet symmetry scheme, we find that the branching ratio BPP, PV with η in the final state agrees well with data, while those with η are underestimated, but by increasing the Bη form factor by 40%–50%, one could explain the tree-dominated Bπη and Bρη measured branching ratios. With this increased form factor and with only a moderate annihilation contribution, we are able to obtain 62×106 for the penguin-dominated BKη branching ratios, quite close to the measured value. This supports the predicted value for the Bη form factor in PQCD and light-cone sum rules approach. A possible increase by 15% of 0|s¯iγ5s|ss¯ for η0 would bring the predicted BKη branching ratio to 69.375×106, very close to experiment.

Corrections

24 January, 2008

Erratum

Article Text

References (24)

  1. J. F. Donoghue, E. Golowich, and B. R. Holstein, Dynamics of the Standard Model (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
  2. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B250, 465 (1985).
  3. T. N. Pham, Phys. Lett. B 246, 175 (1990).
  4. P. Ball and J.-M. Frère, Phys. Lett. B 365, 367 (1996).
  5. H. Georgi, Phys. Rev. D 49, 1666 1994.
  6. J. M. Gerard and E. Kou, Phys. Lett. B 616, 85 (2005).
  7. Y. Dupont and T. N. Pham, Phys. Rev. D 29, 1368 (1984); T. N. Pham, 30, 234 (1984).
  8. C. Isola and T. N. Pham (unpublished).
  9. J. M. Gerard and E. Kou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 261804 (2006).
  10. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, Nucl. Phys. B606, 245 (2001).
  11. M. Beneke and M. Neubert, Nucl. Phys. B675, 333 (2003).
  12. A. Ali, G. Kramer, and C. Lü, Phys. Rev. D 58, 094009 (1998).
  13. B. Dutta, C. S. Kim, S. Oh, and G. H. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. C 37, 273 (2004).
  14. Particle Data Group, J. Phys. G 32, 1 (2006).
  15. T. N. Pham, in 2nd Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle, Durham, April, 2003, eConf C0304052, WG415 (2003); arXiv:hep-ph/0306271.
  16. E. Barberio, XXIII International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energy, Aug. 13-18 2007, Daegu, Korea.
  17. A. Abulencia et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 062003 (2006), quoted in Ref. [14].
  18. D. Brown, XXIII International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energy, Aug. 13-18 2007, Daegu, Korea.
  19. P. Ball and R. Zwicky, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014015 (2005).
  20. E. Barberio et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group), arXiv:0704.3575.
  21. T. N. Pham and G. H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 69, 114016 (2004).
  22. D. S. Du, J. F. Sun, D. S. Yang, and G. H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 65, 094025 (2002); 66, 079904(E) (2002).
  23. Y. Y. Charng, T. Kurimoto, and H.-n. Li, Phys. Rev. D 74, 074024 (2006).
  24. P. Ball and G. W. Jones, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2007) 025.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation