Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

A model for QCD at high density and large quark mass

Roberto De Pietri1,2, Alessandra Feo1,2, Erhard Seiler3, and Ion-Olimpiu Stamatescu4,5

  • 1Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy
  • 2INFN Gruppo Collegato di Parma, Parma, Italy
  • 3Max-Planck-Institut für Physik (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut), München, Germany
  • 4FEST, Protestant Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 5Institut für Theoretische Physik der Universität, Heidelberg, Germany

Phys. Rev. D 76, 114501 – Published 4 December, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.114501

Abstract

We study the high density region of QCD within an effective model obtained in the frame of the hopping parameter expansion and choosing Polyakov-type loops as the main dynamical variables representing the fermionic matter. To get a first idea of the phase structure, the model is analyzed in strong coupling expansion and using a mean field approximation. In numerical simulations, the model still shows the so-called sign problem, a difficulty peculiar to nonzero chemical potential, but it permits the development of algorithms which ensure a good overlap of the Monte Carlo ensemble with the true one. We review the main features of the model and present calculations concerning the dependence of various observables on the chemical potential and on the temperature, in particular, of the charge density and the diquark susceptibility, which may be used to characterize the various phases expected at high baryonic density. We obtain in this way information about the phase structure of the model and the corresponding phase transitions and crossover regions, which can be considered as hints for the behavior of nonzero density QCD.

Article Text

References (28)

  1. M. G. Alford, Proc. Sci. LAT2006 (2006) 001 [arXiv:hep-lat/061004].
  2. F. Karsch, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 46, 122 (2006); Nucl. Phys. A783, 13 (2007).
  3. I. Bender, T. Hashimoto, F. Karsch, V. Linke, A. Nakamura, M. Plewnia, I.-O. Stamatescu, and W. Wetzel, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 26, 323 (1992).
  4. J. Engels, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermannand , Nucl. Phys. B558, 307 (1999).
  5. T. C. Blum, J. E. Hetrick, and D. Toussaint, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1019 (1996); O. Kaczmarek, Ph.D. thesis, Bielefeld, 2000; A. Yamaguchi, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 106, 465 (2002).
  6. G. Aarts, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, and I.-O. Stamatescu, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 106, 456 (2002).
  7. R. Hofmann and I.-O. Stamatescu, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 129, 623 (2004).
  8. P. Hasenfratz and F. Karsch, Phys. Lett. B 125, 308 (1983); J. B. Kogut, H. Matsuoka, M. Stone, H. W. Wyld, S. H. Shenker, J. Shigemitsu, and D. K. Sinclair, Nucl. Phys. B225, 93 (1983).
  9. G. Burgers, F. Karsch, A. Nakamura, and I. O. Stamatescu, Nucl. Phys. B304, 587 1988; T. Hashimoto, A. Nakamura, and I. O. Stamatescu, B406, 325 1993.
  10. I. Pushkina et al. (QCD-TARO Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 609, 265 (2005); QCD-TARO CollaborationNucl. Phys. A698, 395 (2002).
  11. Ph. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, Nucl. Phys. B642, 290 (2002).
  12. M. D’Elia and M.-P. Lombardo, Phys. Rev. D 67, 014505 (2003); M.-P. Lombardo, Proc. Sci. CPOD2006 (2006) 003 [arXiv:hep-lat/0612017].
  13. Z. Fodor and S. D. Katz, Phys. Lett. B 534, 87 (2002); J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2004) 050; S. Ejiri, Phys. Rev. D 69, 094506 (2004); 73, 054502 (2006).
  14. C. R. Allton et al., Phys. Rev. D 68, 014507 (2003); S. Ejiri et al., Nucl. Phys. A774, 837 (2006); Proc. Sci. LAT2006 (2006) 132 [arXiv:hep-lat/0609075].
  15. Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and C. Schmidt, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2007) 121.
  16. P. Hasenfratz, F. Karsch, and I.-O. Stamatescu, Phys. Lett. B 133, 221 (1983); F. Karsch and H. W. Wyld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2242 (1985); C. Alexandrou et al., Phys. Rev. D 60, 034504 (1999); Ph. de Forcrand and U. Laliena, 61, 034502 (2000); M. Alford, S. Chandrasekharan, J. Cox, and U-J. Weise, Nucl. Phys. B602, 61 (2001); R. D. Pisarski, A702, 151 (2002); B.-J. Schaefer, J. M. Pawlowski, and J. Wambach, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074023 (2007).
  17. I.-O. Stamatescu, Phys. Rev. D 25, 1130 (1982); I.-O. Stamatescu and T. T. Wu, Report No. CERN-TH-6631-92, 1993.
  18. R. De Pietri, A. Feo, I.-O. Stamatescu, and E. Seiler, Proc. Sci., LAT2005 (2006) 170 [arXiv:hep-lat/0509167].
  19. M. G. Alford, K. Rajagopal, and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B537, 443 (1999).
  20. P. de Forcrand, M. Garcia Perez, and I.-O. Stamatescu, Nucl. Phys. B499, 409 (1997).
  21. S. Hands, S. Kim, and J. S. Skullerud, Eur. Phys. J. C 48, 193 (2006).
  22. Y. Aoki, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, Phys. Lett. B 643, 46 (2006).
  23. M. G. Schmidt and I.-O. Stamatescu, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 18, 1499 (2003).
  24. C. Itzykson and M. Nauenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 95 (1966).
  25. M. Gourdin, Basics of Lie Groups (Éditions Frontières, Gif-sur-Yvette, 1982).
  26. H. Weyl, Classical Groups (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1946).
  27. J.-M. Drouffe and J.-B. Zuber, Phys. Rep. 102, 1 (1983).
  28. V. F. Müller and W. Rühl, Nucl. Phys. B210, 289 (1982).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation