Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Predictions of ultrahigh-energy proton-air production cross sections from accelerator data

M. M. Block

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA

Phys. Rev. D 76, 111503(R) – Published 14 December, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.111503

Abstract

We make new predictions of σpairprod, the proton-air inelastic production cross section, at pp center-of-mass energies 0.1s100TeV, using high-energy predictions from a saturated Froissart bound parametrization of accelerator data on forward p¯p and pp scattering amplitudes, together with Glauber theory. The parametrization of the p¯p and pp cross sections incorporates analyticity constraints and unitarity, allowing accurate extrapolations to ultrahigh energies. Our predictions are in excellent agreement with available cosmic-ray extensive air shower measurements, both in magnitude and in energy dependence.

Article Text

References (22)

  1. R. M. Baltrusaitis et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1380 (1984).
  2. M. Honda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 525 (1993).
  3. S. P. Knurenko et al., Proceedings of the 27th ICRC (Salt Lake City), Vol. 1 (2001), p. 372.
  4. K. Belov (Hires Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 151, 197 (2006).
  5. M. Aglietta et al., Proceedings of the 25th ICRC (Durban), Vol. 6 (1997), p. 37; G. Trinchero (EASTOP Collaboration), 12th International Conference on Elastic and Diffractive Scattering—Forward Physics and QCD, Desy, Hamburg (2007); EASTOP Collaboration, Aspen Workshop on Cosmic Ray Physics (2007), http://cosmic-ray.physics.rutgers.edu/files; Phys. Lett. B (to be published).
  6. A. Surdo (ARGO-YBJ Collaboration), Proceedings, European Cosmic Ray Symposium (2006); http://www.lip.pt/events/2006/ecrs/proc/ecrs06-s4-31.pdf.
  7. The Pierre Auger Project Design Report, Fermilab Report No. FERMILAB-PUB-96-024, 1997; Paul Mantsch (Pierre Auger Collaboration), arXiv:astro-ph/0604114v1.
  8. M. M. Block and F. Halzen, Phys. Rev. D 72, 036006 (2005).
  9. M. M. Block, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 556, 308 (2006).
  10. M. M. Block, Eur. Phys J. C 47, 697 (2006).
  11. M. M. Block, F. Halzen, and T. Stanev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4926 (1999); Phys. Rev. D 62, 077501 (2000).
  12. R. Engel et al., Phys. Rev. D 58, 014019 (1998).
  13. We will define “standard atmosphere” as the numerical relation given by Eq. (1), in order to have the density of nucleons needed to find the pp cross section from a nuclear model of “air.” It would be useful for the experimenter to reduce his/her measurement to “standard atmosphere” so that it can be compared with other experiments, as well as with theory.

  14. C. L. Pryke, Astropart. Phys. 14, 319 (2001).
  15. T. K. Gaisser et al., Phys. Rev. D 36, 1350 (1987).
  16. R. Engel, Karlsruhe (private communication).
  17. M. M. Block and F. Halzen, Phys. Rev. D 72, 036006 (2005).
  18. M. Froissart, Phys. Rev. 123, 1053 (1961).
  19. K. Hagiwara and S. Eidelman et al. (Particle Data Group) Phys. Lett. B 592, 1 (2004).
  20. M. M. Block, Phys. Rep. 436, 71 (2006).
  21. K. Belov (HiRes Collaboration), Aspen Workshop on Cosmic Ray Physics (2007), http://cosmic-ray.physics.rutgers.edu/files/Belov-sigmapair.ppt.
  22. At s=2TeV, the total cross sections σp¯p and σpp are expected to differ by 0.01mb, and thus, for the purpose of predicting σpairprod, are the same—see Ref. [20].

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation