Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Can string theory predict the Weinberg angle?

Stuart Raby and Akın Wingerter

  • Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, 191 W. Woodruff Ave, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA

Phys. Rev. D 76, 086006 – Published 26 October, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.086006

Abstract

We investigate whether the hypercharge assignments in the standard model can be interpreted as a hint at grand unification in the context of heterotic string theory. Our analysis is a follow-up to the recent mini-landscape analysis of the Z6-II orbifold of the E8×E8 heterotic string. In that analysis, an intermediate grand unified theory (GUT) was a requirement for finding MSSM-like theories. Nevertheless, about 1% of the models in this mini-landscape were MSSM-like. In this paper we remove this GUT restriction. To this end, we introduce a general method to calculate U(1)Y for any heterotic orbifold and compare our findings to the cases where hypercharge arises from a GUT. Surprisingly, in the overwhelming majority of 3-2 standard models, a nonanomalous hypercharge direction can be defined, for which the spectrum is vectorlike. For these models, we calculate sin2θw to see how well it agrees with the standard GUT value. We find that 12% have sin2θw=3/8, while all others have values which are less. Finally, 89% of the models with sin2θw=3/8 have U(1)YSU(5).

Article Text

References (38)

  1. O. Lebedev et al., Phys. Lett. B 645, 88 (2007).
  2. T. Kobayashi, S. Raby, and R.-J. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 593, 262 (2004).
  3. S. Förste, H. P. Nilles, P. K. S. Vaudrevange, and A. Wingerter, Phys. Rev. D 70, 106008 (2004).
  4. T. Kobayashi, S. Raby, and R.-J. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. B704, 3 (2005).
  5. W. Buchmüller, K. Hamaguchi, O. Lebedev, and M. Ratz, arXiv:hep-th/0606187.
  6. W. Buchmüller, K. Hamaguchi, O. Lebedev, and M. Ratz, Nucl. Phys. B712, 139 (2005).
  7. W. Buchmüller, K. Hamaguchi, O. Lebedev, and M. Ratz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 121602 (2006).
  8. W. Buchmüller, K. Hamaguchi, O. Lebedev, and M. Ratz, arXiv:hep-ph/0512326.
  9. S. Förste, H. P. Nilles, and A. Wingerter, Phys. Rev. D 72, 026001 (2005).
  10. S. Förste, H. P. Nilles, and A. Wingerter, Phys. Rev. D 73, 066011 (2006).
  11. H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974).
  12. J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D 10, 275 (1974).
  13. H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 93, 193 (1975).
  14. R. Slansky, Phys. Rep. 79, 1 (1981).
  15. T. Asaka, W. Buchmüller, and L. Covi, Phys. Lett. B 523, 199 (2001).
  16. S. Dimopoulos, S. A. Raby, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Today 44N10, 25 (1991).
  17. H. P. Nilles, arXiv:hep-th/0410160.
  18. H. Esmaeili, N. Mahdavi-Amiri, and E. E. Spedicato, Numer. Math. 90, 101 (2001).
  19. A. K. Lenstra, H. W. Lenstra, and L. Lovász, Math. Ann. 261, 515 (1982).
  20. V. Shoup, A Library for doing Number Theory, Courant Institute, New York University, 2006 http://shoup.net/ntl.
  21. B. Buchberger, Ph.D. thesis, Universitaet Innsbruck, 1965.
  22. G.-M. Greuel, G. Pfister, and H. Schönemann, A Computer Algebra System for Polynomial Computations, Centre for Computer Algebra, University of Kaiserslautern, 2005 http://www.singular.uni-kl.de.
  23. P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal, Conformal Field Theory (Springer, New York, USA, 1997).
  24. Numerical Algorithms Group, NAG C Library, 2004 (http://www.nag.co.uk).
  25. O. Lebedev, H.-P. Nilles, S. Raby, S. Ramos-Sanchez, M. Ratz, P. Vaudrevange, and A. Wingerter (unpublished).
  26. K. R. Dienes, A. E. Faraggi, and J. March-Russell, Nucl. Phys. B467, 44 (1996).
  27. L. J. Hall and Y. Nomura, Phys. Rev. D 64, 055003 (2001).
  28. R. Contino, L. Pilo, R. Rattazzi, and E. Trincherini, Nucl. Phys. B622, 227 (2002).
  29. K. R. Dienes, E. Dudas, and T. Gherghetta, Phys. Lett. B 436, 55 (1998).
  30. H. D. Kim and S. Raby, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2003) 056.
  31. A. Hebecker and M. Trapletti, Nucl. Phys. B713, 173 (2005).
  32. L. E. Ibanez and D. Lust, Nucl. Phys. B382, 305 (1992).
  33. J. Giedt, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 297, 67 (2002).
  34. C. Bauer, A. Frink, and R. Kreckel, arXiv:cs.sc/0004015.
  35. W. Adams and P. Loustaunau, in An Introduction to Gröbner Bases (AMS, Providence, RI, 1996).
  36. T. Becker and V. Weisspfenning, Gröbner Bases - A Computational Approach to Commutative Algebra (Springer, New York, 1993).
  37. J. Gray, Y.-H. He, and A. Lukas, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2006) 031.
  38. M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten, Superstring Theory. Vol. 1: Introduction (University Press, Cambridge, England, 1987).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation