- Access by Xinjiang University
Effective actions of the IIB matrix model on
Phys. Rev. D 76, 084024 – Published 19 October, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.084024
Abstract
is a simple principle bundle which is locally . It has been shown that such a space can be constructed in terms of matrix models. It has also been shown that such a space can be realized by a generalized compactification procedure in the direction. We investigate the effective action of supersymmetric gauge theory on with an angular momentum cutoff and that of a matrix model compactification. Both cases can be realized in a deformed IIB matrix model with a Myers term. We find that the highly divergent contributions at the tree and 1-loop level are sensitive to the UV cutoff. However, the 2-loop level contributions are universal since they are only logarithmically divergent. We expect that the higher loop contributions are insensitive to the UV cutoff since 3-dimensional gauge theory is superrenormalizable.
Article Text
References (23)
- T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 55, 5112 (1997).
- N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, and A. Tsuchiya, Nucl. Phys. B498, 467 (1997).
- H. Aoki, S. Iso, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, A. Tsuchiya, and T. Tada, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 134, 47 (1999).
- H. Aoki, S. Iso, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, and T. Tada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 99, 713 (1998).
- J. Nishimura and G. Vernizzi, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2000) 015.
- K. N. Anagnostopoulos and J. Nishimura, Phys. Rev. D 66, 106008 (2002).
- J. Nishimura and F. Sugino, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2002) 001.
- H. Kawai, S. Kawamoto, T. Kuroki, T. Matsuo, and S. Shinohara, Nucl. Phys. B647, 153 (2002).
- H. Kawai, S. Kawamoto, T. Kuroki, T. Matsuo, and S. Shinohara, Prog. Theor. Phys. 109, 115 (2003).
- Y. Kitazawa, Nucl. Phys. B642, 210 (2002).
- T. Imai, Y. Kitazawa, Y. Takayama, and D. Tomino, Nucl. Phys. B665, 520 (2003).
- T. Imai, Y. Kitazawa, Y. Takayama, and D. Tomino, Nucl. Phys. B679, 143 (2004).
- T. Imai and Y. Takayama, Nucl. Phys. B686, 248 (2004).
- H. Kaneko, Y. Kitazawa, and D. Tomino, Phys. Rev. D 73, 066001 (2006).
- H. Kaneko, Y. Kitazawa, and D. Tomino, Nucl. Phys. B725, 93 (2005).
- M. Hanada, H. Kawai, and Y. Kimura, Prog. Theor. Phys. 114, 1295 (2005).
- G. Ishiki, S. Shimasaki, Y. Takayama, and A. Tsuchiya, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2006) 089.
- L. C. Biedenharn, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 2, 433 (1961).
- M. A. B. Beg and H. Ruegg, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 6, 677 (1965).
- R. E. Cutkosky, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 25, 939 (1984).
- D. Sen, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 27, 472 (1986).
- A. R. Edmonds, Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1960), 2nd ed.
- D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonskii, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).