- Access by Xinjiang University
Decay of a charged scalar and Dirac fields in the Kerr-Newman-de Sitter background
Phys. Rev. D 76, 084018 – Published 17 October, 2007Erratum Phys. Rev. D 90, 029901 (2014)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.084018
Abstract
We find the quasinormal modes of the charged scalar and Dirac fields in the background of the rotating charged black holes, described by the Kerr-Newman-de Sitter solution. The dependence of the quasinormal spectrum upon the black hole parameters mass , angular momentum , charge , as well as on values of the -term and a field charge is investigated. Special attention is given to the near extremal limit of the black hole charge. In particular, we find that for both scalar and Dirac fields, charged perturbations decay quicker for and slower for for values of black holes charge less than some threshold value, which is close to the extremal value of charge and depend on parameters of the black holes.
Erratum
Article Text
References (17)
- K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Living Rev. Relativity 2, 2 (1999).
- R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Nucl. Phys. B777, 182 (2007).
- G. T. Horowitz and V. E. Hubeny, Phys. Rev. D 62, 024027 (2000); D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, arXiv:0704.0240; A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. D 66, 124013 (2002); V. Cardoso and J. P. S. Lemos, 63, 124015 (2001); R. A. Konoplya, 68, 124017 (2003); V. Cardoso, R. Konoplya, and J. P. S. Lemos, 68, 044024 (2003); G. Michalogiorgakis and S. S. Pufu, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2007) 023; S. Musiri, S. Ness, and G. Siopsis, Phys. Rev. D 73, 064001 (2006); I. Amado, C. Hoyos, K. Landsteiner, and S. Montero, arXiv:0706.2750.
- H. R. Beyer, Commun. Math. Phys. 221, 659 (2001); L. E. Simone and C. M. Will, Classical Quantum Gravity 9, 963 (1992); A. Ohashi and M. a. Sakagami, 21, 3973 (2004); R. A. Konoplya and A. V. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B 609, 377 (2005); R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 73, 124040 (2006); A. Zhidenko, 74, 064017 (2006); Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 3155 (2006); E. Berti and K. D. Kokkotas, Phys. Rev. D 67, 064020 (2003); C. Ma, Y. Gui, W. Wang, and F. Wang, arXiv:gr-qc/0611146; R. Konoplya, Phys. Rev. D 71, 024038 (2005); R. A. Konoplya and E. Abdalla, 71, 084015 (2005); R. A. Konoplya and R. D. B. Fontana, arXiv:0707.1156; A. Lopez-Ortega, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 38, 1565 (2006).
- R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Rev. D 66, 084007 (2002).
- W. Zhou and J. Y. Zhu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 13, 1105 (2004).
- R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B 550, 117 (2002).
- X. He and J. Jing, Nucl. Phys. B755, 313 (2006).
- J. Jing, Phys. Rev. D 72, 027501 (2005).
- S. Hod and T. Piran, Phys. Rev. D 58, 024018 (1998); 58, 024017 (1998);
- H. Suzuki, E. Takasugi, and H. Umetsu, Prog. Theor. Phys. 100, 491 (1998).
- A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 74, 064017 (2006).
- E. W. Leaver, Proc. R. Soc. A 402, 285 (1985).
- B. F. Schutz and C. M. Will, Astrophys. J. Lett. 291, L33 (1985); S. Iyer and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3621 (1987); R. A. Konoplya, J. Phys. Stud. 8, 93 (2004); Phys. Rev. D 68, 024018 (2003).
- H. Onozawa, T. Mishima, T. Okamura, and H. Ishihara, Phys. Rev. D 53, 7033 (1996).
- V. Cardoso and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D 67, 084020 (2003).
- R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2004) 037.