- Access by Xinjiang University
Attractor scenarios and superluminal signals in -essence cosmology
Phys. Rev. D 76, 083511 – Published 15 October, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.083511
Abstract
Cosmological scenarios with -essence are invoked in order to explain the observed late-time acceleration of the Universe. These scenarios avoid the need for fine-tuned initial conditions (the “coincidence problem”) because of the attractorlike dynamics of the -essence field . It was recently shown that all -essence scenarios with Lagrangians , where , necessarily involve an epoch where perturbations of propagate faster than light (the “no-go theorem”). We carry out a comprehensive study of attractorlike cosmological solutions (“trackers”) involving a -essence scalar field and another matter component. The result of this study is a complete classification of -essence Lagrangians that admit asymptotically stable tracking solutions, among all Lagrangians of the form . Using this classification, we select the class of models that describe the late-time acceleration and avoid the coincidence problem through the tracking mechanism. An analogous “no-go theorem” still holds for this class of models, indicating the existence of a superluminal epoch. In the context of -essence cosmology, the superluminal epoch does not lead to causality violations. We discuss the implications of superluminal signal propagation for possible causality violations in Lorentz-invariant field theories.
Article Text
References (38)
- T. Chiba, T. Okabe, and M. Yamaguchi, Phys. Rev. D 62, 023511 (2000).
- C. Armendariz-Picon, V. F. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4438 (2000).
- C. Armendariz-Picon, V. F. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. D 63, 103510 (2001).
- E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1753 (2006).
- A. Vikman, Phys. Rev. D 71, 023515 (2005).
- R. R. Caldwell and M. Doran, Phys. Rev. D 72, 043527 (2005).
- J.-G. Hao and X.-Z. Li, Phys. Rev. D 68, 043501 (2003).
- D. Bertacca, S. Matarrese, and M. Pietroni, arXiv:astro-ph/0703259.
- T. Chiba, Phys. Rev. D 66, 063514 (2002).
- R. Das, T. W. Kephart, and R. J. Scherrer, Phys. Rev. D 74, 103515 (2006).
- H. Li, Z.-K. Guo, and Y.-Z. Zhang, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 21, 1683 (2006).
- R. J. Scherrer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 011301 (2004).
- M. Malquarti, E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, and M. Trodden, Phys. Rev. D 67, 123503 (2003).
- H. Wei and R.-G. Cai, Phys. Rev. D 71, 043504 (2005).
- A. D. Rendall, Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 1557 (2006).
- E. Silverstein and D. Tong, Phys. Rev. D 70, 103505 (2004).
- M. Alishahiha, E. Silverstein, and D. Tong, Phys. Rev. D 70, 123505 (2004).
- G. Calcagni and A. R. Liddle, Phys. Rev. D 74, 043528 (2006).
- W. Fang, H. Q. Lu, and Z. G. Huang, Classical Quantum Gravity 24, 3799 (2007).
- C. Bonvin, C. Caprini, and R. Durrer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 081303 (2006).
- S. Liberati, S. Sonego, and M. Visser, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 298, 167 (2002).
- A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis, and R. Rattazzi, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2006) 014.
- E. Babichev, V. F. Mukhanov, and A. Vikman, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2006) 061.
- S. L. Dubovsky and S. M. Sibiryakov, Phys. Lett. B 638, 509 (2006).
- J.-P. Bruneton, Phys. Rev. D 75, 085013 (2007).
- E. Babichev, V. Mukhanov, and A. Vikman, arXiv:0704.3301.
- G. Ellis, R. Maartens, and M. A. H. MacCallum, arXiv:gr-qc/0703121.
- C. Bonvin, C. Caprini, and R. Durrer, arXiv:0706.1538.
- F. Helmer and S. Winitzki, Phys. Rev. D 74, 063528 (2006).
- M. Visser, arXiv:gr-qc/0204022.
- J. Garriga and V. F. Mukhanov, Phys. Lett. B 458, 219 (1999).
- C. Armendariz-Picon and E. A. Lim, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2005) 007.
- C. J. Fewster and C. G. Wells, Phys. Rev. D 52, 5773 (1995).
- S. Rosenberg, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3365 (1998).
- A. Everett, Phys. Rev. D 69, 124023 (2004).
- F. Moldoveanu, Phys. Rev. D 68, 043501 (2003).
- V. F. Mukhanov and A. Vikman, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2006) 004.
- A. Ori, Phys. Rev. D 76, 044002 (2007).