- Access by Xinjiang University
Continuum study of quark-number susceptibility in an effective interaction model
Phys. Rev. D 76, 076005 – Published 18 October, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.076005
Abstract
In the approximation of neglecting the flavor mixing between and quarks in the vector channel, we derive a formula for the quark-number susceptibility based on the external field method. This formula proves to yield exactly the Fermi statistics result of the quark-number susceptibility in the noninteracting situation. Then calculation in an effective interaction model via Dyson-Schwinger equations is performed and it is found that at low temperatures it is zero and it rises sharply to nonzero values across the phase transition point, which is consistent with previous lattice QCD results. The interpretation of this behavior of the quark-number susceptibility as a signal of chiral symmetry restoration and deconfinement is discussed.
Article Text
References (36)
- M. Cheng et al., Phys. Rev. D 74, 054507 (2006).
- Hildegard Meyer-Ortmanns, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 473 (1996).
- G. E. Brown and M. Rho, Phys. Rep. 363, 85 (2002).
- A. Barducci et al., Phys. Rev. D 41, 1610 (1990).
- Yusuke Taniguchi and Yuhsuke Yoshida, Phys. Rev. D 55, 2283 (1997).
- A. Bender, D. Blaschke, Y. Kalinovsky, and C. D. Roberts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3724 (1996).
- T. Hatsuda, Y. Koike, and Su H. Lee, Nucl. Phys. B394, 221 (1993).
- T. Hatsuda, Y. Koike, and Su Houng Lee, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1225 (1993).
- M. Dey, V. L. Eletsky, and B. L. Ioffe, Phys. Lett. B 252, 620 (1990).
- M. Asakawa, U. Heinz, and B. Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2072 (2000).
- S. Jeon and V. Koch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2076 (2000).
- S. Gottlieb et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2247 (1987).
- S. Gottlieb et al., Phys. Rev. D 38, 2888 (1988).
- R. V. Gavai, J. Potvin, and S. Sanielevici, Phys. Rev. D 40, 2743 (1989).
- C. Bernard et al., Phys. Rev. D 54, 4585 (1996).
- S. Gottlieb et al., Phys. Rev. D 55, 6852 (1997).
- Rajiv V. Gavai and Sourendu Gupta, Phys. Rev. D 64, 074506 (2001).
- Radiv V. Gavai and Sourendu Gupta, Phys. Rev. D 65, 094515 (2002).
- Radiv V. Gavai, Sourendu Gupta, and Pushan Majumdar, Phys. Rev. D 65, 054506 (2002).
- C. R. Allton et al., Phys. Rev. D 68, 014507 (2003).
- Teiji Kunihiro, Phys. Lett. B 271, 395 (1991).
- C. Sasaki, B. Friman, and K. Redlich, Phys. Rev. D 75, 054026 (2007).
- C. D. Roberts and A. G. Williams, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 33, 477 (1994).
- C. D. Roberts and S. M. Schmidt, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 45, S1 (2000).
- P. Maris and C. D. Roberts, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 12, 297 (2003).
- C. R. Allton et al., Phys. Rev. D 66, 074507 (2002).
- Sourendu Gupta and R. Ray, Phys. Rev. D 70, 114015 (2004).
- G. E. Brown and M. Rho, Phys. Rep. 269, 333 (1996).
- T. Meissner and L. S. Kisslinger, Phys. Rev. C 59, 986 (1999).
- H. S. Zong et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 015205 (2005).
- H. S. Zong et al., Phys. Rev. C 73, 035206 (2006).
- Y. M. Shi et al., Phys. Lett. B 639, 248 (2006).
- A. Holl, C. D. Roberts, and S. V. Wright, arXiv:nuch-th/0601071v1.
- C. J. Burden, L. Qian, C. D. Roberts, P. C. Tandy, and M. J. Thomson, Phys. Rev. C 55, 2649 (1997).
- D. Blaschke et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 2267 (2001).
- M. R. Frank and C. D. Roberts, Phys. Rev. C 53, 390 (1996).