Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Continuum study of quark-number susceptibility in an effective interaction model

Min He1, Deng-ke He1, Hong-tao Feng1, Wei-min Sun1,2, and Hong-shi Zong1,2,*

  • 1Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, People’s Republic of China
  • 2Joint Center for Particle, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, Nanjing 210093, People’s Republic of China

  • *zonghs@chenwang.nju.edu.cn.

Phys. Rev. D 76, 076005 – Published 18 October, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.076005

Abstract

In the approximation of neglecting the flavor mixing between u and d quarks in the vector channel, we derive a formula for the quark-number susceptibility based on the external field method. This formula proves to yield exactly the Fermi statistics result of the quark-number susceptibility in the noninteracting situation. Then calculation in an effective interaction model via Dyson-Schwinger equations is performed and it is found that at low temperatures it is zero and it rises sharply to nonzero values across the phase transition point, which is consistent with previous lattice QCD results. The interpretation of this behavior of the quark-number susceptibility as a signal of chiral symmetry restoration and deconfinement is discussed.

Article Text

References (36)

  1. M. Cheng et al., Phys. Rev. D 74, 054507 (2006).
  2. Hildegard Meyer-Ortmanns, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 473 (1996).
  3. G. E. Brown and M. Rho, Phys. Rep. 363, 85 (2002).
  4. A. Barducci et al., Phys. Rev. D 41, 1610 (1990).
  5. Yusuke Taniguchi and Yuhsuke Yoshida, Phys. Rev. D 55, 2283 (1997).
  6. A. Bender, D. Blaschke, Y. Kalinovsky, and C. D. Roberts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3724 (1996).
  7. T. Hatsuda, Y. Koike, and Su H. Lee, Nucl. Phys. B394, 221 (1993).
  8. T. Hatsuda, Y. Koike, and Su Houng Lee, Phys. Rev. D 47, 1225 (1993).
  9. M. Dey, V. L. Eletsky, and B. L. Ioffe, Phys. Lett. B 252, 620 (1990).
  10. M. Asakawa, U. Heinz, and B. Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2072 (2000).
  11. S. Jeon and V. Koch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2076 (2000).
  12. S. Gottlieb et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2247 (1987).
  13. S. Gottlieb et al., Phys. Rev. D 38, 2888 (1988).
  14. R. V. Gavai, J. Potvin, and S. Sanielevici, Phys. Rev. D 40, 2743 (1989).
  15. C. Bernard et al., Phys. Rev. D 54, 4585 (1996).
  16. S. Gottlieb et al., Phys. Rev. D 55, 6852 (1997).
  17. Rajiv V. Gavai and Sourendu Gupta, Phys. Rev. D 64, 074506 (2001).
  18. Radiv V. Gavai and Sourendu Gupta, Phys. Rev. D 65, 094515 (2002).
  19. Radiv V. Gavai, Sourendu Gupta, and Pushan Majumdar, Phys. Rev. D 65, 054506 (2002).
  20. C. R. Allton et al., Phys. Rev. D 68, 014507 (2003).
  21. Teiji Kunihiro, Phys. Lett. B 271, 395 (1991).
  22. C. Sasaki, B. Friman, and K. Redlich, Phys. Rev. D 75, 054026 (2007).
  23. C. D. Roberts and A. G. Williams, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 33, 477 (1994).
  24. C. D. Roberts and S. M. Schmidt, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 45, S1 (2000).
  25. P. Maris and C. D. Roberts, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 12, 297 (2003).
  26. C. R. Allton et al., Phys. Rev. D 66, 074507 (2002).
  27. Sourendu Gupta and R. Ray, Phys. Rev. D 70, 114015 (2004).
  28. G. E. Brown and M. Rho, Phys. Rep. 269, 333 (1996).
  29. T. Meissner and L. S. Kisslinger, Phys. Rev. C 59, 986 (1999).
  30. H. S. Zong et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 015205 (2005).
  31. H. S. Zong et al., Phys. Rev. C 73, 035206 (2006).
  32. Y. M. Shi et al., Phys. Lett. B 639, 248 (2006).
  33. A. Holl, C. D. Roberts, and S. V. Wright, arXiv:nuch-th/0601071v1.
  34. C. J. Burden, L. Qian, C. D. Roberts, P. C. Tandy, and M. J. Thomson, Phys. Rev. C 55, 2649 (1997).
  35. D. Blaschke et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 2267 (2001).
  36. M. R. Frank and C. D. Roberts, Phys. Rev. C 53, 390 (1996).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation