Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Higgs decays in supersymmetric models with light neutralinos

Carlos E. Yaguna*

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA, Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA

  • *yaguna@physics.ucla.edu

Phys. Rev. D 76, 075017 – Published 30 October, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.075017

Abstract

In the minimal supersymmetric standard model, neutralinos lighter than 50 GeV are compatible with all accelerator, precision, and cosmological bounds. Such neutralinos might constitute a relevant decay channel for the Higgs boson, modifying its expected signatures at hadron colliders. We study the branching ratio hχχ and determine the region in the supersymmetric parameter space where it is significant. We have found that, in fact, the Higgs may dominantly decay into neutralino pairs. Besides, as a result of this new channel, the branching ratio into visible modes, such as hγγ, gets suppressed.

Article Text

References (21)

  1. R. Barate et al. (LEP Working Group for Higgs Boson Ssearches), Phys. Lett. B 565, 61 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ex/0306033].
  2. ALEPH Collaboration, Phys. Rep. 427, 257 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ex/0509008]; ALEPH Collaboration, arXiv:hep-ex/0511027.
  3. W. M. Yao et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 33, 1 (2006).
  4. C. T. Hill, Phys. Lett. B 135, 47 (1984); J. R. Ellis, K. Enqvist, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. Tamvakis, 155, 381 (1985); M. Drees, 158, 409 (1985); G. Anderson, C. H. Chen, J. F. Gunion, J. D. Lykken, T. Moroi, and Y. Yamada, arXiv:hep-ph/9609457; K. Huitu, Y. Kawamura, T. Kobayashi, and K. Puolamaki, Phys. Rev. D 61, 035001 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9903528]; U. Chattopadhyay and D. P. Roy, 68, 033010 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0304108]; S. Profumo and C. E. Yaguna, Nucl. Phys. B681, 247 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ph/0307225].
  5. H. K. Dreiner, S. Heinemeyer, O. Kittel, U. Langenfeld, A. M. Weber, and G. Weiglein, arXiv:0707.1425.
  6. D. N. Spergel et al. (WMAP Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 170, 377 (2007) [arXiv:astro-ph/0603449].
  7. D. Hooper and T. Plehn, Phys. Lett. B 562, 18 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0212226]; A. Bottino, N. Fornengo, and S. Scopel, Phys. Rev. D 67, 063519 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0212379]; A. Bottino, F. Donato, N. Fornengo, and S. Scopel, 69, 037302 (2004) [arXiv:hep- ph/0307303]; G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Cottrant, A. Pukhov, and S. Rosier-Lees, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2004) 012 [arXiv:hep-ph/0310037]. A. Bottino, F. Donato, N. Fornengo, and S. Scopel, Phys. Rev. D 70, 015005 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ph/0401186]; A. Bottino, F. Donato, N. Fornengo, and P. Salati, 72, 083518 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0507086]; A. Bottino, F. Donato, N. Fornengo, and S. Scopel, 72, 083521 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0508270]; J. S. Lee and S. Scopel, 75, 075001 (2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0701221].
  8. G. B. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, A. Soldatenko, and C. E. Yaguna, Phys. Rev. D 76, 015010 (2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0610379].
  9. S. G. Frederiksen, N. Johnson, G. L. Kane, and J. Reid, Phys. Rev. D 50, R4244 (1994); S. P. Martin and J. D. Wells, 60, 035006 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9903259].
  10. R. M. Godbole, M. Guchait, K. Mazumdar, S. Moretti, and D. P. Roy, Phys. Lett. B 571, 184 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0304137].
  11. H. Davoudiasl, T. Han, and H. E. Logan, Phys. Rev. D 71, 115007 (2005) [arXiv:hep- ph/0412269].
  12. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, F. Donato, R. Godbole, and S. Rosier-Lees, Nucl. Phys. B581, 3 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0002039].
  13. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Cottrant, R. M. Godbole, and A. Semenov, Phys. Lett. B 519, 93 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0106275].
  14. T. Moroi, M. Yamaguchi, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 342, 105 (1995); M. Kawasaki, T. Moroi, and T. Yanagida, 370, 52 (1996); T. Moroi and L. Randall, Nucl. Phys. B570, 455 (2000); M. Fujii and K. Hamaguchi, Phys. Rev. D 66, 083501 (2002); M. Fujii and M. Ibe, 69, 035006 (2004); D. H. Lyth and E. D. Stewart, 53, 1784 (1996); M. Kamionkowski and M. S. Turner, 42, 3310 (1990); J. D. Barrow, Nucl. Phys. B208, 501 (1982); P. Salati, Phys. Lett. B 571, 121 (2003) [arXiv:astro-ph/0207396]; S. Profumo and P. Ullio, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2003) 006 [arXiv:hep-ph/0309220]; G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, A. Soldatenko, and C. E. Yaguna, Phys. Rev. D 74, 083514 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ph/0605016].
  15. L. Reina, arXiv:hep-ph/0512377.
  16. A. Djouadi, arXiv:hep-ph/0503173.
  17. M. Davier, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 169, 288 (2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0701163].
  18. E. Barberio et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFAG)), arXiv:hep-ex/0603003.
  19. T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak, G. Weiglein, and K. Williams, arXiv:hep-ph/0611373; G. Degrassi, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, P. Slavich, and G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C 28, 133 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0212020]; S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein, Comput. Phys. Commun. 124, 76 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/9812320]; Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 343 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9812472].
  20. A. Djouadi, M. Drees, P. Fileviez Perez, and M. Muhlleitner, Phys. Rev. D 65, 075016 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0109283].
  21. Since BR(hχχ) depends also on tanβ, the suppression will depend on tanβ too.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation