Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Renormalization group evolution in the type I and type II seesaw model

Michael Andreas Schmidt*

  • MPI für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany

  • *michael.schmidt@mpi-hd.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. D 76, 073010 – Published 22 October, 2007Erratum Phys. Rev. D 85, 099903 (2012)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.073010

Abstract

We carefully analyze the renormalization group equations in the typeI+II seesaw scenario in the extended standard model and the minimal supersymmetric standard model. Furthermore, we present analytic formulas of the mixing angles and phases and discuss the renormalization group effect on the different mixing parameters in the type II seesaw scenario. The renormalization group equations of the angles are independent of the Majorana phases. In addition, there is a contribution which is proportional to the mass squared difference for a hierarchical spectrum. This is in contrast to the inverse proportionality to the mass squared difference in the effective field theory case.

Erratum

Article Text

References (81)

  1. T. Schwetz, Phys. Scr. T t127, 1 (2006).
  2. K. Miuchi et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50, 825 (2003).
  3. T. Araki et al. (KamLAND), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 081801 (2005).
  4. E. Aliu et al. (K2K), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 081802 (2005).
  5. B. Aharmim et al. (SNO), Phys. Rev. C 72, 055502 (2005).
  6. Y. Ashie et al. (Super-Kamiokande), Phys. Rev. D 71, 112005 (2005).
  7. B. J. Rebel (MINOS), Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 168, 195 (2007).
  8. P. Huber, M. Lindner, M. Rolinec, T. Schwetz, and W. Winter, Phys. Rev. D 70, 073014 (2004).
  9. G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio, New J. Phys. 6, 106 (2004).
  10. R. N. Mohapatra et al., arXiv:hep-ph/0510213.
  11. R. N. Mohapatra and A. Y. Smirnov, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56, 569 (2006).
  12. P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. 67B, 421 (1977).
  13. T. Yanagida, in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Unified Theory and the Baryon Number in the Universe, edited by O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto (KEK, Tsukuba, Japan, 1979), p. 95.
  14. S. L. Glashow, in Proceedings of the Cargèse Summer Institute on Quarks and Leptons,1979 edited by M. Lévy, J.-L. Basdevant, D. Speiser, J. Weyers, R. Gastmans, and M. Jacob (Plenum Press, New York, 1980), pp. 687–713.
  15. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, in Supergravity, edited by P. van Nieuwenhuizen and D. Z. Freedman (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), p. 315.
  16. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
  17. M. Magg and C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. 94B, 61 (1980).
  18. G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi, and C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. B181, 287 (1981).
  19. K. R. S. Balaji, A. S. Dighe, R. N. Mohapatra, and M. K. Parida, Phys. Lett. B 481, 33 (2000).
  20. T. Miura, E. Takasugi, and M. Yoshimura, Prog. Theor. Phys. 104, 1173 (2000).
  21. S. Antusch and M. Ratz, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2002) 010.
  22. R. N. Mohapatra, M. K. Parida, and G. Rajasekaran, Phys. Rev. D 69, 053007 (2004).
  23. C. Hagedorn, J. Kersten, and M. Lindner, Phys. Lett. B 597, 63 (2004).
  24. P. H. Chankowski, A. Ioannisian, S. Pokorski, and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3488 (2001).
  25. E. J. Chun, Phys. Lett. B 505, 155 (2001).
  26. M.-C. Chen and K. T. Mahanthappa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 3923 (2001).
  27. A. S. Joshipura, S. D. Rindani, and N. N. Singh, Nucl. Phys. B660, 362 (2003).
  28. A. S. Joshipura and S. D. Rindani, Phys. Rev. D 67, 073009 (2003).
  29. N. N. Singh and M. K. Das, arXiv:hep-ph/0407206.
  30. S. Antusch, J. Kersten, M. Lindner, and M. Ratz, Phys. Lett. B 544, 1 (2002).
  31. T. Miura, T. Shindou, and E. Takasugi, Phys. Rev. D 68, 093009 (2003).
  32. T. Shindou and E. Takasugi, Phys. Rev. D 70, 013005 (2004).
  33. S. Antusch, J. Kersten, M. Lindner, and M. Ratz, Nucl. Phys. B674, 401 (2003).
  34. J.-w. Mei and Z.-z. Xing, Phys. Rev. D 70, 053002 (2004).
  35. S. Antusch, P. Huber, J. Kersten, T. Schwetz, and W. Winter, Phys. Rev. D 70, 097302 (2004).
  36. H. Minakata and A. Y. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. D 70, 073009 (2004).
  37. A. Dighe, S. Goswami, and P. Roy, Phys. Rev. D 73, 071301 (2006).
  38. M. A. Schmidt and A. Y. Smirnov, Phys. Rev. D 74, 113003 (2006).
  39. A. Dighe, S. Goswami, and P. Roy, arXiv:0704.3735.
  40. F. Plentinger and W. Rodejohann, Phys. Lett. B 625, 264 (2005).
  41. S. Luo and Z.-z. Xing, Phys. Lett. B 632, 341 (2006).
  42. R. N. Mohapatra, S. Nasri, and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Lett. B 639, 318 (2006).
  43. M. Hirsch, E. Ma, J. C. Romao, J. W. F. Valle, and A. Villanova del Moral, Phys. Rev. D 75, 053006 (2007).
  44. A. Dighe, S. Goswami, and W. Rodejohann, Phys. Rev. D 75, 073023 (2007).
  45. J.-w. Mei and Z.-z. Xing, Phys. Lett. B 623, 227 (2005).
  46. Z.-z. Xing and H. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 635, 107 (2006).
  47. M. Tanimoto, Phys. Lett. B 360, 41 (1995).
  48. J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa, A. Ibarra, and I. Navarro, Nucl. Phys. B556, 3 (1999).
  49. J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa, A. Ibarra, and I. Navarro, Nucl. Phys. B569, 82 (2000).
  50. S. F. King and N. N. Singh, Nucl. Phys. B591, 3 (2000).
  51. S. Antusch, J. Kersten, M. Lindner, and M. Ratz, Phys. Lett. B 538, 87 (2002).
  52. S. Antusch, J. Kersten, M. Lindner, M. Ratz, and M. A. Schmidt, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2005) 024.
  53. J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa, A. Ibarra, and I. Navarro, Nucl. Phys. B573, 652 (2000).
  54. P. H. Chankowski and Z. Pluciennik, Phys. Lett. B 316, 312 (1993).
  55. K. S. Babu, C. N. Leung, and J. Pantaleone, Phys. Lett. B 319, 191 (1993).
  56. S. Luo and Z.-z. Xing, Phys. Lett. B 637, 279 (2006).
  57. J.-W. Mei, Phys. Rev. D 71, 073012 (2005).
  58. M. Lindner, M. Ratz, and M. A. Schmidt, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2005) 081.
  59. Z.-z. Xing and H. Zhang, arXiv:hep-ph/0601106.
  60. Recently Chankowski et al. showed that a Y=0 Higgs triplet does not decouple from the SM [61], which imposes strong constraints on models involving a Y=0 Higgs triplet. However, this result cannot immediately translate to a Y=1 Higgs triplet like in the type-II seesaw mechanism, because the nonvanishing hypercharge leads to a coupling of the Higgs triplet to the hypercharge boson, which in turn leads to different contributions to the electroweak precision observables, e.g. the mass of the Z boson receives additional corrections which results in corrections to the ρ=MW2MZ2cos2θW parameter.

  61. P. H. Chankowski, S. Pokorski, and J. Wagner, Eur. Phys. J. C 50, 919 (2007).
  62. M. Schmidt, diploma thesis, TU München, 2004.
  63. REAP/MixingParameterTools can be downloaded from http://www.ph.tum.de/~rge.
  64. W. Chao and H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 75, 033003 (2007).
  65. The calculation of the necessary diagrams in the extended SM can be downloaded from http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/~schmidt/rgeTriplet. Chao and Zhang checked the relevant parts of their calculation and obtained the same results as we do.
  66. The case without right-handed neutrinos has been studied in [81].
  67. We use GUT charge normalization: 35(g1GUT)2=(g1SM)2.

  68. C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. B187, 343 (1981).
  69. S. Antusch, M. Drees, J. Kersten, M. Lindner, and M. Ratz, Phys. Lett. B 519, 238 (2001).
  70. J. Kersten, diploma thesis, TU München, 2001.
  71. S. Antusch, Ph.D. thesis, TU München, 2003.
  72. M. Ratz, Ph.D. thesis, TU München, 2002.
  73. J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. 49B, 52 (1974).
  74. J. Iliopoulos and B. Zumino, Nucl. Phys. B76, 310 (1974).
  75. S. Antusch and M. Ratz, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2002) 059.
  76. The terms coming from the Higgs triplet in our calculation agree with the calculation by Rossi [81].
  77. W. M. Yao et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 33, 1 (2006).
  78. K. S. Babu, Z. Phys. C 35, 69 (1987).
  79. B. Grzadkowski and M. Lindner, Phys. Lett. B 193, 71 (1987).
  80. A Mathematica package with the exact formula can be downloaded from http://www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/~schmidt/rgeTriplet/.
  81. A. Rossi, Phys. Rev. D 66, 075003 (2002).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation