Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Proton stability in supersymmetric SU(5)

Zurab Tavartkiladze*

  • Physics Department, Theory Division, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland and Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, USA

  • *zurab.tavartkiladze@okstate.edu

Phys. Rev. D 76, 055012 – Published 28 September, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.055012

Abstract

Within supersymmetric SU(5) grand unified theory (GUT) we suggest mechanisms for suppression of baryon number violating dimension five and six operators. The mechanism is based on the idea of split multiplets (i.e. quarks and leptons are not coming from a single GUT state) which is realized by an extension with additional vectorlike matter. The construction naturally avoids wrong asymptotic relation M^D=M^E. Thus, the long-standing problems of the minimal supersymmetric SU(5) GUT can be resolved. In a particular example of flavor structure and with additional U(1)×Z3N symmetry we demonstrate how the split multiplet mechanism works out. Namely, the considered model is compatible with successful gauge coupling unification and realistic fermion mass pattern. The nucleon decay rates are relatively suppressed and can be well compatible with current experimental bounds.

Article Text

References (28)

  1. N. Sakai and T. Yanagida, Nucl. Phys. B197, 533 (1982); S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 26, 287 (1982).
  2. This decay mode dominates in simple minded SUSY SU(5) and SO(10) GUTs.

  3. W. M. Yao et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 33, 1 (2006).
  4. G. R. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 287, 101 (1992); K. S. Babu and S. M. Barr, Phys. Rev. D 48, 5354 (1993); J. Hisano, T. Moroi, K. Tobe, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 342, 138 (1995); Z. Berezhiani, arXiv:hep-ph/9602325; I. Gogoladze and A. Kobakhidze, Phys. At. Nucl. 60, 126 (1997); Z. Chacko and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 59, 011702 (1998).
  5. Z. Berezhiani, Z. Tavartkiladze, and M. Vysotsky, arXiv:hep-ph/9809301.
  6. Q. Shafi and Z. Tavartkiladze, Phys. Lett. B 451, 129 (1999); 459, 563 (1999).
  7. Q. Shafi and Z. Tavartkiladze, Nucl. Phys. B573, 40 (2000).
  8. B. Bajc, P. Fileviez Perez, and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. D 66, 075005 (2002); D. Emmanuel-Costa and S. Wiesenfeldt, Nucl. Phys. B661, 62 (2003); S. Wiesenfeldt, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19, 2155 (2004); N. Haba and T. Ota, arXiv:hep-ph/0608244; I. Dorsner, P. F. Perez, and G. Rodrigo, Phys. Lett. B 649, 197 (2007).
  9. For a review and extended list of references see P. Nath and P. F. Perez, Phys. Rep. 441, 191 (2007).
  10. Y. Kawamura, Prog. Theor. Phys. 105, 999 (2001); G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio, Phys. Lett. B 511, 257 (2001); A. B. Kobakhidze, 514, 131 (2001); L. J. Hall and Y. Nomura, Phys. Rev. D 64, 055003 (2001); A. Hebecker and J. March-Russell, Nucl. Phys. B613, 3 (2001).
  11. R. Dermisek A. Mafiand , Phys. Rev. D 65, 055002 (2002); A. Hebecker and J. March-Russell, Phys. Lett. B 539, 119 (2002); L. J. Hall and Y. Nomura, Phys. Rev. D 66, 075004 (2002); Q. Shafi and Z. Tavartkiladze, 67, 075007 (2003); Nucl. Phys. B665, 469 (2003); B. Kyae, C. A. Lee, and Q. Shafi, B683, 105 (2004); W. Buchmuller, L. Covi, D. Emmanuel-Costa, and S. Wiesenfeldt, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2004) 004; M. L. Alciati, F. Feruglio, Y. Lin, and A. Varagnolo, 03 (2005) 054; 11 (2006) 039.
  12. Although we will discuss the mechanism in an example of SUSY SU(5), it can be applied also for non-SUSY SU(5) in order to suppress GUT gauge boson mediated d=6 baryon number violation.

  13. Q. Shafi and Z. Tavartkiladze, Phys. Lett. B 473, 272 (2000); arXiv:hep-ph/0207231.
  14. C. Bachas, C. Fabre, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 370, 49 (1996); B. Bajc, P. Fileviez Perez, and G. Senjanovic, arXiv:hep-ph/0210374.
  15. J. Hisano, H. Murayama, and T. Yanagida, Nucl. Phys. B402, 46 (1993).
  16. This property of 50-plet can be used to realize natural doublet-triplet splitting in the scalar sector by missing partner mechanism: H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. 108B, 283 (1982); B. Grinstein, Nucl. Phys. B206, 387 (1982); A. Masiero, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. Tamvakis, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. 115B, 380 (1982).
  17. M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, Phys. Lett. 149B, 117 (1984).
  18. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B188, 513 (1981); W. Fischler, H. P. Nilles, J. Polchinski, S. Raby, and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 757 (1981).
  19. M. Dine, N. Seiberg, and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B289, 589 (1987); J. J. Atick, L. J. Dixon, and A. Sen, B292, 109 (1987); M. Dine, I. Ichinose, and N. Seiberg, B293, 253 (1987).
  20. G. R. Dvali and S. Pokorski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 807 (1997).
  21. Of course, it is desirable to have a more appealing mechanism for the DT splitting, but this goes beyond the scope of this work.

  22. P. Langacker and N. Polonsky, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3081 (1995); J. Bagger, K. T. Matchev, and D. Pierce, Phys. Lett. B 348, 443 (1995).
  23. L. E. Ibanez and C. Munoz, Nucl. Phys. B245, 425 (1984).
  24. T. Nihei and J. Arafune, Prog. Theor. Phys. 93, 665 (1995).
  25. P. Nath and R. Arnowitt, Phys. Rev. D 38, 1479 (1988); N. Sakai and T. Yanagida, Nucl. Phys. B197, 533 (1982).
  26. For MG02·1016GeV, ms(MZ)=93MeV, and tanβ3.7.

  27. S. Dimopoulos and F. Wilczek, Print-81-0600 (Santa Barbara); See [4b]; L. J. Hall and S. Raby, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6524 (1995); Z. Berezhiani and Z. Tavartkiladze, Phys. Lett. B 409, 220 (1997); N. Maekawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 106, 401 (2001); B. Kyae and Q. Shafi, Phys. Rev. D 72, 063515 (2005); and references therein.
  28. Z. G. Berezhiani and G. R. Dvali, Bull. Lebedev Phys. Inst. 5, 55 (1989); R. Barbieri, G. R. Dvali, and A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B391, 487 (1993); Z. Berezhiani, C. Csaki, and L. Randall, B444, 61 (1995); G. R. Dvali and S. Pokorski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 807 (1997).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation