- Access by Xinjiang University
Proton stability in supersymmetric
Phys. Rev. D 76, 055012 – Published 28 September, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.055012
Abstract
Within supersymmetric grand unified theory (GUT) we suggest mechanisms for suppression of baryon number violating dimension five and six operators. The mechanism is based on the idea of split multiplets (i.e. quarks and leptons are not coming from a single GUT state) which is realized by an extension with additional vectorlike matter. The construction naturally avoids wrong asymptotic relation . Thus, the long-standing problems of the minimal supersymmetric GUT can be resolved. In a particular example of flavor structure and with additional symmetry we demonstrate how the split multiplet mechanism works out. Namely, the considered model is compatible with successful gauge coupling unification and realistic fermion mass pattern. The nucleon decay rates are relatively suppressed and can be well compatible with current experimental bounds.
Article Text
References (28)
- N. Sakai and T. Yanagida, Nucl. Phys. B197, 533 (1982); S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 26, 287 (1982).
This decay mode dominates in simple minded SUSY and GUTs.
- W. M. Yao et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 33, 1 (2006).
- G. R. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 287, 101 (1992); K. S. Babu and S. M. Barr, Phys. Rev. D 48, 5354 (1993); J. Hisano, T. Moroi, K. Tobe, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 342, 138 (1995); Z. Berezhiani, arXiv:hep-ph/9602325; I. Gogoladze and A. Kobakhidze, Phys. At. Nucl. 60, 126 (1997); Z. Chacko and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 59, 011702 (1998).
- Z. Berezhiani, Z. Tavartkiladze, and M. Vysotsky, arXiv:hep-ph/9809301.
- Q. Shafi and Z. Tavartkiladze, Phys. Lett. B 451, 129 (1999); 459, 563 (1999).
- Q. Shafi and Z. Tavartkiladze, Nucl. Phys. B573, 40 (2000).
- B. Bajc, P. Fileviez Perez, and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. D 66, 075005 (2002); D. Emmanuel-Costa and S. Wiesenfeldt, Nucl. Phys. B661, 62 (2003); S. Wiesenfeldt, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19, 2155 (2004); N. Haba and T. Ota, arXiv:hep-ph/0608244; I. Dorsner, P. F. Perez, and G. Rodrigo, Phys. Lett. B 649, 197 (2007).
- For a review and extended list of references see P. Nath and P. F. Perez, Phys. Rep. 441, 191 (2007).
- Y. Kawamura, Prog. Theor. Phys. 105, 999 (2001); G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio, Phys. Lett. B 511, 257 (2001); A. B. Kobakhidze, 514, 131 (2001); L. J. Hall and Y. Nomura, Phys. Rev. D 64, 055003 (2001); A. Hebecker and J. March-Russell, Nucl. Phys. B613, 3 (2001).
- R. Dermisek A. Mafiand , Phys. Rev. D 65, 055002 (2002); A. Hebecker and J. March-Russell, Phys. Lett. B 539, 119 (2002); L. J. Hall and Y. Nomura, Phys. Rev. D 66, 075004 (2002); Q. Shafi and Z. Tavartkiladze, 67, 075007 (2003); Nucl. Phys. B665, 469 (2003); B. Kyae, C. A. Lee, and Q. Shafi, B683, 105 (2004); W. Buchmuller, L. Covi, D. Emmanuel-Costa, and S. Wiesenfeldt, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2004) 004; M. L. Alciati, F. Feruglio, Y. Lin, and A. Varagnolo, 03 (2005) 054; 11 (2006) 039.
Although we will discuss the mechanism in an example of SUSY , it can be applied also for non-SUSY in order to suppress GUT gauge boson mediated baryon number violation.
- Q. Shafi and Z. Tavartkiladze, Phys. Lett. B 473, 272 (2000); arXiv:hep-ph/0207231.
- C. Bachas, C. Fabre, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 370, 49 (1996); B. Bajc, P. Fileviez Perez, and G. Senjanovic, arXiv:hep-ph/0210374.
- J. Hisano, H. Murayama, and T. Yanagida, Nucl. Phys. B402, 46 (1993).
- This property of 50-plet can be used to realize natural doublet-triplet splitting in the scalar sector by missing partner mechanism: H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. 108B, 283 (1982); B. Grinstein, Nucl. Phys. B206, 387 (1982); A. Masiero, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. Tamvakis, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. 115B, 380 (1982).
- M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, Phys. Lett. 149B, 117 (1984).
- E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B188, 513 (1981); W. Fischler, H. P. Nilles, J. Polchinski, S. Raby, and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 757 (1981).
- M. Dine, N. Seiberg, and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B289, 589 (1987); J. J. Atick, L. J. Dixon, and A. Sen, B292, 109 (1987); M. Dine, I. Ichinose, and N. Seiberg, B293, 253 (1987).
- G. R. Dvali and S. Pokorski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 807 (1997).
Of course, it is desirable to have a more appealing mechanism for the DT splitting, but this goes beyond the scope of this work.
- P. Langacker and N. Polonsky, Phys. Rev. D 52, 3081 (1995); J. Bagger, K. T. Matchev, and D. Pierce, Phys. Lett. B 348, 443 (1995).
- L. E. Ibanez and C. Munoz, Nucl. Phys. B245, 425 (1984).
- T. Nihei and J. Arafune, Prog. Theor. Phys. 93, 665 (1995).
- P. Nath and R. Arnowitt, Phys. Rev. D 38, 1479 (1988); N. Sakai and T. Yanagida, Nucl. Phys. B197, 533 (1982).
For , , and .
- S. Dimopoulos and F. Wilczek, Print-81-0600 (Santa Barbara); See [4b]; L. J. Hall and S. Raby, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6524 (1995); Z. Berezhiani and Z. Tavartkiladze, Phys. Lett. B 409, 220 (1997); N. Maekawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 106, 401 (2001); B. Kyae and Q. Shafi, Phys. Rev. D 72, 063515 (2005); and references therein.
- Z. G. Berezhiani and G. R. Dvali, Bull. Lebedev Phys. Inst. 5, 55 (1989); R. Barbieri, G. R. Dvali, and A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B391, 487 (1993); Z. Berezhiani, C. Csaki, and L. Randall, B444, 61 (1995); G. R. Dvali and S. Pokorski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 807 (1997).