Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Stopping gluinos

A. Arvanitaki1, S. Dimopoulos1, A. Pierce1,2, S. Rajendran1, and J. Wacker1

  • 1Physics Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
  • 2SLAC, Stanford University, Menlo Park, California 94309, USA

Phys. Rev. D 76, 055007 – Published 21 September, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.055007

Abstract

Long-lived gluinos are the trademark of split supersymmetry. They form R-hadrons that, when charged, efficiently lose energy in matter via ionization. Independent of R-spectroscopy and initial hadronization, a fraction of R-hadrons become charged while traversing a detector. This results in a large number of stopped gluinos at present and future detectors. For a 300 GeV gluino, 106 will stop each year in LHC detectors, while several hundred stop in detectors during Run II at the Tevatron. The subsequent decays of stopped gluinos produce distinctive depositions of energy in calorimeters with no activity in either the tracker or the muon chamber. The gluino lifetime can be determined by looking for events where both gluinos stop and subsequently decay.

Article Text

References (26)

  1. N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2005) 073.
  2. G. F. Giudice and A. Romanino, Nucl. Phys. B699, 65 (2004); B706, 65(E) (2005); N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. F. Giudice, and A. Romanino, B709, 3 (2005).
  3. J. D. Wells, arXiv:hep-ph/0306127; Phys. Rev. D 71, 015013 (2005).
  4. W. Kilian, T. Plehn, P. Richardson, and E. Schmidt, Eur. Phys. J. C 39, 229 (2005).
  5. J. L. Hewett, B. Lillie, M. Masip, and T. G. Rizzo, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2004) 070.
  6. A. C. Kraan, Eur. Phys. J. C 37, 91 (2004); arXiv:hep-ex/0506009.
  7. K. Cheung and W. Y. Keung, Phys. Rev. D 71, 015015 (2005).
  8. G. R. Farrar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4111 (1996); S. Raby, Phys. Lett. B 422, 158 (1998); A. Mafi and S. Raby, Phys. Rev. D 62, 035003 (2000).
  9. H. Baer, K. m. Cheung, and J. F. Gunion, Phys. Rev. D 59, 075002 (1999).
  10. A. Heister et al. (ALEPH Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 31, 327 (2003).
  11. R. Culbertson et al. (SUSY Working Group Collaboration), arXiv:hep-ph/0008070.
  12. M. Toharia and J. D. Wells, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2006) 015.
  13. L. Anchordoqui, H. Goldberg, and C. Nunez, Phys. Rev. D 71, 065014 (2005); J. G. Gonzalez, S. Reucroft, and J. Swain, 74, 027701 (2006).
  14. K. Hamaguchi, Y. Kuno, T. Nakaya, M. M. Nojiriand , Phys. Rev. D 70, 115007 (2004); J. L. Feng and B. T. Smith, 71, 015004 (2005); 71, 019904(E) (2005).
  15. A. Arvanitaki, C. Davis, P. W. Graham, A. Pierce, and J. G. Wacker, Phys. Rev. D 72, 075011 (2005).
  16. H. L. Lai et al., Phys. Rev. D 55, 1280 (1997); H. L. Lai and W. K. Tung, Z. Phys. C 74, 463 (1997).
  17. E. Eichten, I. Hinchliffe, K. D. Lane, and C. Quigg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, 579 (1984); 58, 1065(A) (1986).
  18. M. Spira, arXiv:hep-ph/9711408; W. Beenakker, R. Hopker, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas, Nucl. Phys. B492, 51 (1997).
  19. S. J. Brodsky, J. F. Gunion, and D. E. Soper, Phys. Rev. D 36, 2710 (1987).
  20. M. S. Chanowitz and S. R. Sharpe, Phys. Lett. B 126, 225 (1983).
  21. J. Sabin and J. Oddershede, Phys. Rev. A 39, 1033 (1989). L. E. Porter, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 69, 39 (1992). C. J. Bakker and E. Segre, Phys. Rev. 81, 489 (1951).
  22. E. Fermi and E. Teller, Phys. Rev. 72, 399 (1947).
  23. J. Lindhard, M. Scharff, and E. M. Sciott, K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Medd. 34, 4 (1964). J. Lindhard and M. Scharff, Phys. Rev. 124, 128 (1961).
  24. S. Eidelman et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Lett. B 592, 1 (2004).
  25. P. Gambino, G. F. Giudice, and P. Slavich, Nucl. Phys. B726, 35 (2005).
  26. F. Abe et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 46, R1889 (1992).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation