Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Inverted mass hierarchy from scaling in the neutrino mass matrix: Low and high energy phenomenology

A. Blum1,*, R. N. Mohapatra2,†, and W. Rodejohann1,‡

  • 1Max–Planck–Institut für Kernphysik, Postfach 10 39 80, D–69029 Heidelberg, Germany
  • 2Department of Physics and Maryland Center for Fundamental Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA and Sektion Physik, Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität München, Theresienstrasse 37a, D–80333 München, Germany and Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, James-Franck-Strasse, D-85748 Garching, Germany

  • *alexander.blum@mpi-hd.mpg.de
  • rmohapat@physics.umd.edu
  • werner.rodejohann@mpi-hd.mpg.de

Phys. Rev. D 76, 053003 – Published 14 September, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.053003

Abstract

Best-fit values of recent global analyses of neutrino data imply large solar neutrino mixing, vanishing Ue3, and a nonmaximal atmospheric neutrino mixing angle θ23. We show that these values emerge naturally by the hypothesis of scaling in the Majorana neutrino mass matrix, which states that the ratios of its elements are equal. It also predicts an inverted hierarchy for the neutrino masses. We point out several advantages and distinguishing tests of the scaling hypothesis compared to the LeLμLτ flavor symmetry, which is usually assumed to provide an understanding of the inverted hierarchy. Scenarios which have initially vanishing Ue3 and maximal atmospheric neutrino mixing are shown to be unlikely to lead to nonmaximal θ23 while simultaneously keeping Ue3 zero. We find a peculiar ratio of the branching ratios μeγ and τeγ in supersymmetric seesaw frameworks, which only depends on atmospheric neutrino mixing and results in τeγ being unobservable. The consequences of the scaling hypothesis for high energy astrophysical neutrinos at neutrino telescopes are also investigated. Then we analyze a seesaw model based on the discrete symmetry D4×Z2 leading to scaling in the low energy mass matrix and being capable of generating the baryon asymmetry of the Universe via leptogenesis. The relevant CP phase is identical to the low energy Majorana phase, and successful leptogenesis requires an effective mass for neutrinoless double beta decay larger than 0.045 eV.

Article Text

References (34)

  1. R. N. Mohapatra et al., arXiv:hep-ph/0510213; R. N. Mohapatra and A. Y. Smirnov, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56, 569 (2006); A. Strumia and F. Vissani, arXiv:hep-ph/0606054.
  2. R. N. Mohapatra and W. Rodejohann, Phys. Lett. B 644, 59 (2007).
  3. W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, J. Phys. G 31, 683 (2005); Phys. Rev. D 62, 093012 (2000); L. Lavoura, 62, 093011 (2000); M. S. Berger and S. Santana, 74, 113007 (2006); A. Damanik, M. Satriawan, P. Anggraita, and Muslim, arXiv:0705.3290.
  4. M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni, arXiv:0704.1800.
  5. G. L. Fogli et al., Phys. Rev. D 75, 053001 (2007).
  6. S. T. Petcov, Phys. Lett. 110B, 245 (1982); an incomplete list of more recent studies is R. Barbieri et al., J. High Energy Phys. 12 (1998) 017; A. S. Joshipura and S. D. Rindani, Eur. Phys. J. C 14, 85 (2000); Q. Shafi and Z. Tavartkiladze, Phys. Lett. B 482, 145 (2000); K. S. Babu and R. N. Mohapatra, 532, 77 (2002); H. J. He, D. A. Dicus, and J. N. Ng, 536, 83 (2002); G. K. Leontaris, J. Rizos, and A. Psallidas, 597, 182 (2004); P. H. Frampton and R. N. Mohapatra, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2005) 025; S. T. Petcov and W. Rodejohann, Phys. Rev. D 71, 073002 (2005); W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, J. Phys. G 31, 683 (2005); G. Altarelli and R. Franceschini, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2006) 047; A. Palcu, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 22, 939 (2007); K. S. Babu, A. G. Bachri, and Z. Tavartkiladze, arXiv:0705.4419.
  7. S. M. Bilenky, J. Hosek, and S. T. Petcov, Phys. Lett. 94B, 495 (1980); J. Schechter and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2227 (1980); 23, 1666 (1981); M. Doi et al., Phys. Lett. 102B, 323 (1981); Yu. F. Pirogov, Eur. Phys. J. C 17, 407 (2000).
  8. P. H. Chankowski and Z. Pluciennik, Phys. Lett. B 316, 312 (1993); K. S. Babu, C. N. Leung, and J. T. Pantaleone, 319, 191 (1993); N. Haba and N. Okamura, Eur. Phys. J. C 14, 347 (2000); P. H. Chankowski, W. Krolikowski, and S. Pokorski, Phys. Lett. B 473, 109 (2000); J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa, A. Ibarra, and I. Navarro, Nucl. Phys. B573, 652 (2000); S. Antusch, J. Kersten, M. Lindner, M. Ratz, and M. A. Schmidt, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2005) 024.
  9. C. Aalseth et al., arXiv:hep-ph/0412300.
  10. S. Pascoli, S. T. Petcov, and W. Rodejohann, Phys. Lett. B 549, 177 (2002); S. Pascoli, S. T. Petcov, and T. Schwetz, Nucl. Phys. B734, 24 (2006).
  11. P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. 67B, 421 (1977); M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Supergravity, edited by P. van Nieuwenhuizen (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1980), p. 315; T. Yanagida, in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Unified Theory and the Baryon Number in the Universe, edited by O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto (KEK, Tsukuba, Japan, 1979), p. 95; S. L. Glashow, in Proceedings of the 1979 Cargèse Summer Institute on Quarks and Leptons, edited by M. Lévy (Plenum Press, New York, 1980), p. 687; R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
  12. F. Borzumati and A. Masiero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 961 (1986); J. Hisano, T. Moroi, K. Tobe, and M. Yamaguchi, Phys. Rev. D 53, 2442 (1996); J. A. Casas and A. Ibarra, Nucl. Phys. B618, 171 (2001).
  13. M. L. Brooks et al. (MEGA Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1521 (1999).
  14. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 231801 (2007).
  15. M. Sorel, J. M. Conrad, and M. Shaevitz, Phys. Rev. D 70, 073004 (2004); M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz, arXiv:0705.0107.
  16. S. Goswami and W. Rodejohann, arXiv:0706.1462.
  17. J. G. Learned and K. Mannheim, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 50, 679 (2000); T. K. Gaisser, F. Halzen, and T. Stanev, Phys. Rep. 258, 173 (1995); 271, 355(E) (1996).
  18. S. Pakvasa, Yad. Fiz. 67, 1179 (2004) [Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19, 1163 (2004)]; arXiv:hep-ph/0405179; P. Bhattacharjee and N. Gupta, arXiv:hep-ph/0501191; P. D. Serpico and M. Kachelriess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 211102 (2005); P. D. Serpico, Phys. Rev. D 73, 047301 (2006); W. Winter, 74, 033015 (2006); D. Meloni and T. Ohlsson, 75, 125017 (2007); R. L. Awasthi and S. Choubey, arXiv:0706.0399; P. Lipari, M. Lusignoli, and D. Meloni, Phys. Rev. D 75, 123005 (2007); K. Blum, Y. Nir, and E. Waxman, arXiv:0706.2070.
  19. Z. Z. Xing, Phys. Rev. D 74, 013009 (2006).
  20. W. Rodejohann, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2007) 029.
  21. J. Ahrens et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 118, 371 (2003).
  22. J. F. Beacom, N. F. Bell, D. Hooper, S. Pakvasa, and T. J. Weiler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 181301 (2003); Phys. Rev. D 69, 017303 (2004).
  23. An incomplete list of references is T. Fukuyama and H. Nishiura, arXiv:hep-ph/9702253; R. N. Mohapatra and S. Nussinov, Phys. Rev. D 60, 013002 (1999); E. Ma and M. Raidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 011802 (2001); C. S. Lam, Phys. Lett. B 507, 214 (2001); P. F. Harrison and W. G. Scott, 547, 219 (2002); T. Kitabayashi and M. Yasue, Phys. Rev. D 67, 015006 (2003); W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, Phys. Lett. B 572, 189 (2003); J. Phys. G 30, 73 (2004); Y. Koide, Phys. Rev. D 69, 093001 (2004); A. Ghosal, arXiv:hep-ph/0304090; W. Grimus et al., Nucl. Phys. B713, 151 (2005); R. N. Mohapatra, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2004) 027; A. de Gouvea, Phys. Rev. D 69, 093007 (2004); S. Choubey and W. Rodejohann, Eur. Phys. J. C 40, 259 (2005); R. N. Mohapatra and W. Rodejohann, Phys. Rev. D 72, 053001 (2005); R. N. Mohapatra and S. Nasri, 71, 033001 (2005); R. N. Mohapatra, S. Nasri, and H. B. Yu, Phys. Lett. B 615, 231 (2005); Phys. Rev. D 72, 033007 (2005); Y. H. Ahn et al., 73, 093005 (2006); 75, 013012 (2007); T. Ota and W. Rodejohann, Phys. Lett. B 639, 322 (2006); K. Fuki and M. Yasue, arXiv:hep-ph/0608042; B. Brahmachari and S. Choubey, Phys. Lett. B 642, 495 (2006); W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, J. Phys. G 34, 1757 (2007).
  24. R. N. Mohapatra, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2004) 027.
  25. K. A. Hochmuth, S. T. Petcov, and W. Rodejohann, arXiv:0706.2975.
  26. P. H. Frampton, S. T. Petcov, and W. Rodejohann, Nucl. Phys. B687, 31 (2004).
  27. S. T. Petcov and W. Rodejohann, Phys. Rev. D 71, 073002 (2005).
  28. A recent review can be found in E. Ma, arXiv:0705.0327.
  29. C. Hagedorn and W. Rodejohann, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2005) 034.
  30. U. Sarkar and S. K. Singh, Nucl. Phys. B771, 28 (2007).
  31. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986).
  32. A. Abada, S. Davidson, F. X. Josse-Michaux, M. Losada, and A. Riotto, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2006) 004; E. Nardi, Y. Nir, E. Roulet, and J. Racker, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2006) 164; recent overviews are given in S. Blanchet and P. Di Bari, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 168, 372 (2007); S. Davidson, arXiv:0705.1590.
  33. G. F. Giudice, A. Notari, M. Raidal, A. Riotto, and A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B685, 89 (2004).
  34. D. N. Spergel et al. (WMAP Collaboration), arXiv:astro-ph/0603449.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation