- Access by Xinjiang University
Gluon condensate, Wilson loops and gauge/string duality
Phys. Rev. D 76, 047705 – Published 28 August, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.047705
Abstract
We test gauge/string duality by evaluating expectation values of small Wilson loops in pure Yang-Mills theories. On the gauge theory side, there exists a rich phenomenology. The dual formulation provides a universal language to evaluate the gluon condensate and quadratic correction in terms of the metric in the fifth coordinate. Quantitatively, the estimated value of the gluon condensate is approximately .
Article Text
References (17)
- M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainstein, and V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B147, 385 (1979); B147, 448 (1979).
- T. Banks, R. Horsley, H. R. Rubinstein, and U. Wolff, Nucl. Phys. B190, 692 (1981); A. Di Giacomo and G. C. Rossi, Phys. Lett. B 100, 481 (1981).
- For a recent discussion, see P. E. Rakow, Proc. Sci. LAT2005 (2006) 284, and references therein.
- J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
- O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and Y. Oz, Phys. Rep. 323, 183 (2000).
- Equation (1) is the ansatz. This time we do not know equations that provide such a solution. As known, the equations are the condition for conformal invariance of a two-dimensional model. Since is of order 1 [11], one needs the exact beta functions of background fields (Weyl-anomaly coefficients) rather than their leading expansions. This makes the problem extremely difficult. Instead of solving it, we follow “the inverse scattering problem”: first, we suggest a solution, then we look for its phenomenological relevance.
In the AdS/CFT duality geometric symmetries of are related with scalar fields on the gauge theory side. Since we consider a pure gauge theory without additional scalars, it seems reasonable to assume a trivial dependence on .
- A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. D 74, 015005 (2006).
- O. Andreev, Phys. Rev. D 73, 107901 (2006).
- The sign of the exponent in (1) is different from that of [8,9]. The point is that we use the Euclidean metric. The Minkowskian metric of [8,9] is obtained via analytic continuation together with .
- O. Andreev and V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Rev. D 74, 025023 (2006).
- N. Drukker, D. J. Gross, and H. Ooguri, Phys. Rev. D 60, 125006 (1999).
- D. Berenstein, R. Corrado, W. Fischler, and J. Maldacena, Phys. Rev. D 59, 105023 (1999).
- V. I. Zakharov, arXiv:hep-ph/0309178.
- E. Eichten and K. Gottfried, Phys. Lett. B 66, 286 (1977); C. Quigg and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rep. 56, 167 (1979); E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K. D. Lane, and T. M. Yan, Phys. Rev. D 21, 203 (1980).
- A. M. Badalian and D. S. Kuzmenko, Phys. Rev. D 65, 016004 (2001); Yad. Fiz. 67, 579 (2004); Phys. At. Nucl. 67, 561 (2004).
- S. Narison, Phys. Lett. B 387, 162 (1996).