Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Holographic mixing quantified

Brian Batell* and Tony Gherghetta

  • School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA

  • *batell@physics.umn.edu
  • tgher@physics.umn.edu

Phys. Rev. D 76, 045017 – Published 31 August, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.045017

Abstract

We compute the precise elementary/composite field content of mass eigenstates in holographic duals of warped models in a slice of AdS5. This is accomplished by decomposing the bulk fields not in the usual Kaluza-Klein basis, but rather into a holographic basis of 4D fields, corresponding to purely elementary source or conformal field theory (CFT) composite fields. Generically, this decomposition yields kinetic and mass mixing between the elementary and composite sectors of the holographic theory. Depending on where the bulk zero mode is localized, the elementary/composite content may differ radically, which we show explicitly for several examples including the bulk Randall-Sundrum graviton, bulk gauge boson, and Higgs boson.

Article Text

References (28)

  1. J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998); Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999).
  2. S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 428, 105 (1998).
  3. E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998).
  4. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999).
  5. N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati, and L. Randall, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2001) 017.
  6. R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2001) 021.
  7. M. Perez-Victoria, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2001) 064.
  8. T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, Nucl. Phys. B586, 141 (2000).
  9. T. Gherghetta, arXiv:hep-ph/0601213.
  10. B. Batell and T. Gherghetta (unpublished).
  11. R. Contino, T. Kramer, M. Son, and R. Sundrum, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2007) 074.
  12. K. S. Babu, C. Kolda, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D 57, 6788 (1998).
  13. G.’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B72, 461 (1974).
  14. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B160, 57 (1979).
  15. J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 261602 (2005).
  16. L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, Nucl. Phys. B721, 79 (2005).
  17. T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, Phys. Rev. D 67, 085018 (2003).
  18. I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B556, 89 (1999).
  19. T. H. Bauer, R. D. Spital, D. R. Yennie, and F. M. Pipkin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 261 (1978). 51, 407(E) (1979).
  20. B. Batell and T. Gherghetta, Phys. Rev. D 73, 045016 (2006); 75, 025022 (2007).
  21. T. Gherghetta, M. Peloso, and E. Poppitz, Phys. Rev. D 72, 104003 (2005).
  22. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 (1999).
  23. H. Davoudiasl, J. L. Hewett, and T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Lett. B 473, 43 (2000).
  24. A. Pomarol, Phys. Lett. B 486, 153 (2000).
  25. K. Agashe and A. Delgado, Phys. Rev. D 67, 046003 (2003).
  26. B. Batell and A. Larkoski, arXiv:hep-th/0610218.
  27. R. Contino, Y. Nomura, and A. Pomarol, Nucl. Phys. B671, 148 (2003).
  28. K. Agashe, R. Contino, and A. Pomarol, Nucl. Phys. B719, 165 (2005).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation