Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Metric for gradient renormalization group flow of the worldsheet sigma model beyond first order

T. Oliynyk1,*, V. Suneeta2,†, and E. Woolgar3,‡

  • 1Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert Einstein Institute), Am Mühlenberg 1, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany
  • 2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 5A3
  • 3Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G1

  • *todd.oliynyk@aie.mpg.de Address after 1 June 2007: School of Mathematical Sciences, Monash University, Vic 3800, Australia.
  • suneeta@math.unb.ca Address after 1 July 2007: Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB, Canada T6G 2G1.
  • ewoolgar@math.ualberta.ca

Phys. Rev. D 76, 045001 – Published 2 August, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.045001

Abstract

Tseytlin has recently proposed that an action functional exists whose gradient generates to all orders in perturbation theory the renormalization group (RG) flow of the target space metric in the worldsheet sigma model. The gradient is defined with respect to a metric on the space of coupling constants which is explicitly known only to leading order in perturbation theory, but at that order is positive semidefinite, as follows from Perelman’s work on the Ricci flow. This gives rise to a monotonicity formula for the flow which is expected to fail only if the beta function perturbation series fails to converge, which can happen if curvatures or their derivatives grow large. We test the validity of the monotonicity formula at next-to-leading order in perturbation theory by explicitly computing the second-order terms in the metric on the space of coupling constants. At this order, this metric is found not to be positive semidefinite. In situations where this might spoil monotonicity, derivatives of curvature become large enough for higher-order perturbative corrections to be significant.

Article Text

References (13)

  1. D. Friedan, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 163, 318 (1985).
  2. Gary Gibbons (unpublished).
  3. A. B. Zamolodchikov, JETP Lett. 43, 730 (1986).
  4. A. A. Tseytlin, Phys. Rev. D 75, 064024 (2007).
  5. G. Perelman, arXiv:math.DG/0211159.
  6. V. A. Fateev, E. Onofri, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Nucl. Phys. B406, 521 (1993).
  7. T. Oliynyk, V. Suneeta, and E. Woolgar, Nucl. Phys. B739, 441 (2006).
  8. C. G. Callan, I. R. Klebanov, and M. J. Perry, Nucl. Phys. B278, 78 (1986).
  9. A. A. Tseytlin, Phys. Lett. B 194, 63 (1987).
  10. H. Osborn, Nucl. Phys. B294, 595 (1987); B308, 629 (1988); Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 200, 1 (1990); Nucl. Phys. B363, 486 (1991).
  11. I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and N. Mohammedi, Nucl. Phys. B322, 431 (1989).
  12. A. L. Besse, Einstein Manifolds (Springer, Berlin, 1987), Chap. 16.E, pp. 443–447.
  13. J.-P. Bourguignon, in Global Differential Geometry and Global Analysis, Lectures in Mathematics Vol. 838, edited by D. Ferus (Springer, Berlin, 1981).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation