Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Scalar-field perturbations from a particle orbiting a black hole using numerical evolution in 2+1 dimensions

Leor Barack and Darren A. Golbourn

  • School of Mathematics, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom

Phys. Rev. D 76, 044020 – Published 23 August, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.044020

Abstract

We present a new technique for time-domain numerical evolution of the scalar- field generated by a pointlike scalar charge orbiting a black hole. Time-domain evolution offers an efficient way for calculating black hole perturbations, especially as input for computations of the local self force acting on orbiting particles. In Kerr geometry, the field equations are not fully separable in the time domain, and one has to tackle them in 2+1 dimensions (two spatial dimensions and time; the azimuthal dependence is still separable). A technical difficulty arises when the source of the field is a pointlike particle, as the 2+1-dimensional perturbation is then singular: Each of the azimuthal modes diverges logarithmically at the particle. To deal with this problem we split the numerical domain into two regions: Inside a thin worldtube surrounding the particle’s worldline we solve for a regularized variable, obtained from the full field by subtracting out a suitable puncture function, given analytically. Outside this worldtube we solve for the full, original field. The value of the evolution variable is adjusted across the boundary of the worldtube. In this work we demonstrate the applicability of this method in the example of circular orbits around a Schwarzschild black hole (refraining from exploiting the spherical symmetry of the background, and working in 2+1 dimensions).

Article Text

References (37)

  1. L. Barack and C. Cutler, Phys. Rev. D 69, 082005 (2004).
  2. B. S. DeWitt and R. W. Brehme, Ann. Phys. (Paris) 9, 220 (1960).
  3. Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D 55, 3457 (1997).
  4. T. C. Quinn and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 56, 3381 (1997).
  5. T. C. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D 62, 064029 (2000).
  6. S. Detweiler and B. F. Whiting, Phys. Rev. D 67, 024025 (2003).
  7. L. Barack and A. Ori, Phys. Rev. D 61, 061502 (2000).
  8. L. Barack, Y. Mino, H. Nakano, A. Ori, and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 091101 (2002).
  9. L. Barack and A. Ori, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 111101 (2003).
  10. L. Barack and C. O. Lousto, Phys. Rev. D 72, 104026 (2005).
  11. L. Barack and N. Sago, Phys. Rev. D 75, 064021 (2007).
  12. L. Barack and C. O. Lousto, Phys. Rev. D 66, 061502 (2002).
  13. T. S. Keidl, J. L. Friedman, and A. G. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. D 75, 124009 (2007).
  14. A procedure to obtain the SF directly from the Weyl scalars through direct regularization of the latter has been suggested recently, but has not yet been implemented for orbiting particles [13].

  15. W. Krivan, P. Laguna, and P. Papadopoulos, Phys. Rev. D 54, 4728 (1996).
  16. W. Krivan, P. Laguna, P. Papadopoulos, and N. Andersson, Phys. Rev. D 56, 3395 (1997).
  17. R. Lopez-Aleman, G. Khanna, and J. Pullin, Classical Quantum Gravity 20, 3259 (2003).
  18. G. Khanna, Phys. Rev. D 69, 024016 (2004).
  19. E. Pazos-Avalos and C. O. Lousto, Phys. Rev. D 72, 084022 (2005).
  20. P. A. Sundararajan, G. Khanna, and S. A. Hughes, arXiv:gr-qc/0703028.
  21. L. Barack and A. Ori, Phys. Rev. D 67, 024029 (2003).
  22. S. Brandt and B. Bruegmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3606 (1997).
  23. L. M. Burko and G. Khanna, Europhys. Lett. 78, 60005 (2007).
  24. C. F. Sopuerta, P. Sun, P. Laguna, and J. Xu, Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 251 (2006).
  25. C. F. Sopuerta and P. Laguna, Phys. Rev. D 73, 044028 (2006).
  26. N. T. Bishop, R. Gomez, S. Husa, L. Lehner, and J. Winicour, Phys. Rev. D 68, 084015 (2003).
  27. L. Barack and A. Ori, Phys. Rev. D 66, 084022 (2002).
  28. Y. Mino, H. Nakano, and M. Sasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 108, 1039 (2002).
  29. One may consider an alternative puncture function, obtained by replacing 2(1cosδφ)sin2δφ in Eq. (28). This has the advantage that the odd m-modes of ΦP and SR can be written in terms of elementary functions. The disadvantage is that, to avoid the singularity of this alternative ΦP at ρ=0, δφ=π, one has to introduce a cutoff on ΦP at some |δφ|<π, which then generates distributional contributions to the source modes SRm, complicating their form considerably.

  30. I. S. Gradsteyn and I. W. Ryzhik, Tables of Integrals, Series and Products (Academic Press, New York, 1980).
  31. This can be seen by considering the volume integral of ΦR over a small 3-ball (in Σ) surrounding the particle, at the limit where the radius of the ball tends to zero. Using the Gauss theorem, this can be converted to a surface integral of ΦR,α over the 2-sphere. By virtue of Eq. (35) we have that ΦR is bounded at the particle, and that the gradient ΦR,α can at most diverge as 1/ϵ0 there. Hence, the surface integral of ΦR,α vanishes as the radius of the 2-sphere is taken to zero, implying ΦR (and hence also SR) contains no Dirac deltas.

  32. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992), Chap. 19.1.
  33. The relation between local and global errors in the scheme (61) can be explained as follows: At each grid point, the field accumulates local errors from h2 points belonging to the same θ=const slice. [Note that the leading-order contribution to Ψ1m in Eq. (61) comes from points 2–4, which lie on the same θ=const slice as point 1.] Assuming the local O(h4) errors are not strongly correlated, they accumulate to give a global error of O(h2×h4)=O(h2).

  34. R. H. Price, Phys. Rev. D 5, 2419 (1972).
  35. L. Barack and L. M. Burko, Phys. Rev. D 62, 084040 (2000).
  36. L. Barack, D. A. Golbourn, and N. Sago (unpublished).
  37. N. Hernandez, M.S. thesis, University of Texas at Brownsville (unpublished).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation