Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Polymer quantum mechanics and its continuum limit

Alejandro Corichi1,2,3,*, Tatjana Vukašinac4,†, and José A. Zapata1,‡

  • 1Instituto de Matemáticas, Unidad Morelia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM-Campus Morelia, A. Postal 61-3, Morelia, Michoacán 58090, Mexico
  • 2Departamento de Gravitación y Teoría de Campos, Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, A. Postal 70-543, México D.F. 04510, Mexico
  • 3Institute for Gravitational Physics and Geometry, Physics Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
  • 4Facultad de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo, Morelia, Michoacán 58000, Mexico

  • *corichi@matmor.unam.mx
  • tatjana@shi.matmor.unam.mx
  • zapata@matmor.unam.mx

Phys. Rev. D 76, 044016 – Published 21 August, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.044016

Abstract

A rather nonstandard quantum representation of the canonical commutation relations of quantum mechanics systems, known as the polymer representation, has gained some attention in recent years, due to its possible relation with Planck scale physics. In particular, this approach has been followed in a symmetric sector of loop quantum gravity known as loop quantum cosmology. Here we explore different aspects of the relation between the ordinary Schrödinger theory and the polymer description. The paper has two parts. In the first one, we derive the polymer quantum mechanics starting from the ordinary Schrödinger theory and show that the polymer description arises as an appropriate limit. In the second part we consider the continuum limit of this theory, namely, the reverse process in which one starts from the discrete theory and tries to recover back the ordinary Schrödinger quantum mechanics. We consider several examples of interest, including the harmonic oscillator, the free particle, and a simple cosmological model.

Article Text

References (12)

  1. R. Beaume, J. Manuceau, A. Pellet, and M. Sirugue, Commun. Math. Phys. 38, 29 (1974); W. E. Thirring and H. Narnhofer, Rev. Math. Phys. 4, 197 (1992); F. Acerbi, G. Morchio, and F. Strocchi, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 34, 899 (1993); F. Cavallaro, G. Morchio, and F. Strocchi, Lett. Math. Phys. 47, 307 (1999); H. Halvorson, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 35, 45 (2004).
  2. A. Ashtekar, S. Fairhurst, and J. L. Willis, Classical Quantum Gravity 20, 1031 (2003).
  3. K. Fredenhagen and F. Reszewski, Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 6577 (2006).
  4. M. Bojowald, Living Rev. Relativity 8, 11 (2005); A. Ashtekar, M. Bojowald, and J. Lewandowski, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7, 233 (2003); A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski, and P. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 74, 084003 (2006).
  5. V. Husain and O. Winkler, Phys. Rev. D 75, 024014 (2007); 69, 084016 (2004).
  6. A. Corichi, T. Vukasinac, and J. A. Zapata, Classical Quantum Gravity 24, 1495 (2007).
  7. A. Corichi and J. Cortez, “Canonical Quantization from an Algebraic Perspective,” report.
  8. A. Corichi, J. Cortez, and H. Quevedo, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 313, 446 (2004).
  9. D. W. Chiou, Classical Quantum Gravity 24, 2603 (2007).
  10. W. Rudin, Fourier Analysis on Groups (Interscience, New York, 1962).
  11. E. Manrique, R. Oeckl, A. Weber, and J. A. Zapata, Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 3393 (2006); “Effective Theories and Continuum Limit for Canonical Loop Quantization,” report.
  12. A. Ashtekar, A. Corichi, and P. Singh, “Contrasting LQC and WDW Using an Exactly Soluble Model,” report; A. Corichi, T. Vukasinac, and J. A. Zapata, “Continuum Limit for Quantum Constrained System,” report.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation