Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Circular and noncircular nearly horizon-skimming orbits in Kerr spacetimes

Enrico Barausse*

Scott A. Hughes

Luciano Rezzolla

  • SISSA, International School for Advanced Studies and INFN, Via Beirut 2, 34014 Trieste, Italy

  • Department of Physics and MIT Kavli Institute, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

  • Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik, Albert-Einstein-Institut, 14476 Potsdam, Germany and Department of Physics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA

  • *barausse@sissa.it

Phys. Rev. D 76, 044007 – Published 8 August, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.044007

Abstract

We have performed a detailed analysis of orbital motion in the vicinity of a nearly extremal Kerr black hole. For very rapidly rotating black holes—spin parameter aJ/M>0.9524M—we have found a class of very strong-field eccentric orbits whose orbital angular momentum Lz increases with the orbit’s inclination with respect to the equatorial plane, while keeping latus rectum and eccentricity fixed. This behavior is in contrast with Newtonian intuition, and is in fact opposite to the normal behavior of black hole orbits. Such behavior was noted previously for circular orbits; since it only applies to orbits very close to the black hole, they were named “nearly horizon-skimming orbits.” Our current analysis generalizes this result, mapping out the full generic (inclined and eccentric) family of nearly horizon-skimming orbits. The earlier work on circular orbits reported that, under gravitational radiation emission, nearly horizon-skimming orbits exhibit unusual inspiral, tending to evolve to smaller orbit inclination, toward prograde equatorial configuration. Normal orbits, by contrast, always demonstrate slowly growing orbit inclination—orbits evolve toward the retrograde equatorial configuration. Using up-to-date Teukolsky-based fluxes, we have concluded that the earlier result was incorrect—all circular orbits, including nearly horizon-skimming ones, exhibit growing orbit inclination under radiative backreaction. Using kludge fluxes based on a Post-Newtonian expansion corrected with fits to circular and to equatorial Teukolsky-based fluxes, we argue that the inclination grows also for eccentric nearly horizon-skimming orbits. We also find that the inclination change is, in any case, very small. As such, we conclude that these orbits are not likely to have a clear and peculiar imprint on the gravitational waveforms expected to be measured by the space-based detector LISA.

Article Text

References (33)

  1. http://lisa.nasa.gov/; http://sci.esa.int/home/lisa/

    .

  2. J. Kormendy and D. Richstone, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 33, 581 (1995).
  3. J. R. Gair, L. Barack, T. Creighton, C. Cutler, S. L. Larson, E. S. Phinney, and M. Vallisneri, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, S1595 (2004).
  4. S. L. Shapiro, Astrophys. J. 620, 59 (2005).
  5. L. Rezzolla, T. W. Maccarone, S. Yoshida, and O. Zanotti, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 344, L37 (2003).
  6. R. Shafee, J. E. McClintock, R. Narayan, S. W. Davis, L.-X. Li, and R. A. Remilland, Astrophys. J. 636, L113 (2006).
  7. J. E. McClintock, R. Shafee, R. Narayan, R. A. Remilland, S. W. Davis, and L.-X. Li, Astrophys. J. 652, 518 (2006).
  8. A. C. Fabian and G. Miniutti, in Kerr Spacetime: Rotating Black Holes in General Relativity, 2005, edited by D. L. Wiltshire, M. Visser, and S. M. Scott (to be published); arXiv:astro-ph/0507409.
  9. L. W. Brenneman and C. S. Reynolds, Astrophys. J. 652, 1028 (2006).
  10. L. Barack and C. Cutler, Phys. Rev. D 69, 082005 (2004).
  11. M. Volonteri, P. Madau, E. Quataert, and M. J. Rees, Astrophys. J. 620, 69 (2005).
  12. D. C. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. D 5, 814 (1972).
  13. J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press, and S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J. 178, 347 (1972).
  14. S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D 63, 064016 (2001).
  15. K. S. Thorne, R. H. Price, and D. A. MacDonald, Black Holes: The Membrane Paradigm (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1986).
  16. F. D. Ryan, Phys. Rev. D 52, R3159 (1995).
  17. S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D 61, 084004 (2000).
  18. B. Carter, Phys. Rev. 174, 1559 (1968).
  19. K. S. Thorne, Astrophys. J. 191, 507 (1974).
  20. Y. Mino, Phys. Rev. D 67, 084027 (2003).
  21. S. Drasco and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D 73, 024027 (2006).
  22. N. Sago, T. Tanaka, W. Hikida, and H. Nakano, Prog. Theor. Phys. 114, 509 (2005); 115, 873 (2006).
  23. K. Glampedakis, S. A. Hughes, D. Kennefickand , Phys. Rev. D 66, 064005 (2002).
  24. J. R. Gair and K. Glampedakis, Phys. Rev. D 73, 064037 (2006).
  25. C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973).
  26. W. Schmidt, Classical Quantum Gravity 19, 2743 (2002).
  27. A. Ori and K. S. Thorne, Phys. Rev. D 62, 124022 (2000).
  28. S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J. 185, 635 (1973).
  29. M. Sasaki and T. Nakamura, Prog. Theor. Phys. 67, 1788 (1982).
  30. F. D. Ryan, Phys. Rev. D 53, 3064 (1996).
  31. D. Kennefick and A. Ori, Phys. Rev. D 53, 4319 (1996).
  32. Y. Mino, Ph.D. thesis, Kyoto University, 1996 (unpublished).
  33. Data available at http://gmunu.mit.edu/sdrasco/snapshots/.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation