- Rapid Communication
- Access by Xinjiang University
Nongeometric fluxes as supergravity backgrounds
Phys. Rev. D 76, 041901(R) – Published 30 August, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.041901
Abstract
We consider examples of string theory vacua which, although globally nongeometric, admit a local description in terms of supergravity backgrounds. We analyze such backgrounds and find that the supersymmetry spinors vary nontrivially along the internal manifold, reproducing the interpolating supergravity solutions found by Frey and Graña. Finally, we propose a simple, local expression for nongeometric fluxes in terms of the internal spinors of the compactification.
Article Text
References (34)
- For reviews see, e.g., M. Graña, Phys. Rep. 423, 91 (2006); M. R. Douglas and S. Kachru, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 733 (2007); R. Blumenhagen, B. Körs, D. Lüst, and S. Stieberger, arXiv:hep-th/0610327.
- K. Dasgupta, G. Rajesh, and S. Sethi, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (1999) 023.
- S. B. Giddings, S. Kachru, and J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. D 66, 106006 (2002).
- S. Gukov, C. Vafa, and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B584, 69 (2000); B608, 477(E) (2001).
- F. Denef, M. R. Douglas, and S. Kachru, arXiv:hep-th/0701050.
- For reviews see C. P. Burgess, arXiv:hep-th/0606020; S. H. Henry Tye, arXiv:hep-th/0610221; J. M. Cline, arXiv:hep-th/0612129; R. Kallosh, arXiv:hep-th/0702059.
- C. M. Hull, Print-86-0251-CAMBRIDGE; A. Strominger, Nucl. Phys. B274, 253 (1986).
- S. Gurrieri, J. Louis, A. Micu, and D. Waldram, Nucl. Phys. B654, 61 (2003).
- S. Kachru, M. B. Schulz, P. K. Tripathy, and S. P. Trivedi, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2003) 061.
- A. Dabholkar and C. Hull, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2003) 054; S. Hellerman, J. McGreevy, and B. Williams, 01 (2004) 024; A. Flournoy, B. Wecht, and B. Williams, Nucl. Phys. B706, 127 (2005).
- C. M. Hull, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2005) 065.
- J. Shelton, W. Taylor, and B. Wecht, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2005) 085.
- A. Dabholkar and C. Hull, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 009.
- G. Aldazábal, P. G. Cámara, A. Font, and L. E. Ibáñez, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 070.
- J. Shelton, W. Taylor, and B. Wecht, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2007) 095; A. Micu, E. Palti, and G. Tasinato, 03 (2007) 104.
- I. R. Klebanov and M. J. Strassler, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2000) 052.
We are using the convention .
- A. R. Frey and J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. D 65, 126009 (2002).
- M. Graña and J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. D 63, 026001 (2000).
- K. Becker and M. Becker, Nucl. Phys. B477, 155 (1996).
- T. H. Buscher, Phys. Lett. B 194, 59 (1987).
- Following the conventions in [3], for a -form on a manifold we have that .
- M. R. Douglas, arXiv:hep-th/9512077.
- C. Angelantonj, E. Dudas, and J. Mourad, Nucl. Phys. B637, 59 (2002).
- M. Mariño, R. Minasian, G. W. Moore, and A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2000) 005.
- S. F. Hassan, Nucl. Phys. B568, 145 (2000).
- A. R. Frey and M. Graña, Phys. Rev. D 68, 106002 (2003).
- L. Martucci and P. Smyth, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2005) 048.
- G. Dall’Agata, Nucl. Phys. B695, 243 (2004).
- S. Fidanza, R. Minasian, and A. Tomasiello, Commun. Math. Phys. 254, 401 (2005).
- I. Benmachiche and T. W. Grimm, Nucl. Phys. B748, 200 (2006); I. T. Ellwood, arXiv:hep-th/0612100.
- J. Gray and E. J. Hackett-Jones, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 071.
- M. Graña, J. Louis, and D. Waldram, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2007) 101.
- R. D’Auria, S. Ferrara, and M. Trigiante, arXiv:hep-th/0701247.