Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Nongeometric fluxes as supergravity backgrounds

Fernando Marchesano1 and Waldemar Schulgin2

  • 1ASC, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Theresienstraße 37, 80333 München, Germany
  • 2Max Planck Institut für Physik, Föhringer Ring 6, 80805 München, Germany

Phys. Rev. D 76, 041901(R) – Published 30 August, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.041901

Abstract

We consider examples of D=4 string theory vacua which, although globally nongeometric, admit a local description in terms of D=10 supergravity backgrounds. We analyze such backgrounds and find that the supersymmetry spinors vary nontrivially along the internal manifold, reproducing the interpolating supergravity solutions found by Frey and Graña. Finally, we propose a simple, local expression for nongeometric fluxes in terms of the internal spinors of the compactification.

Article Text

References (34)

  1. For reviews see, e.g., M. Graña, Phys. Rep. 423, 91 (2006); M. R. Douglas and S. Kachru, Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 733 (2007); R. Blumenhagen, B. Körs, D. Lüst, and S. Stieberger, arXiv:hep-th/0610327.
  2. K. Dasgupta, G. Rajesh, and S. Sethi, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (1999) 023.
  3. S. B. Giddings, S. Kachru, and J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. D 66, 106006 (2002).
  4. S. Gukov, C. Vafa, and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B584, 69 (2000); B608, 477(E) (2001).
  5. F. Denef, M. R. Douglas, and S. Kachru, arXiv:hep-th/0701050.
  6. For reviews see C. P. Burgess, arXiv:hep-th/0606020; S. H. Henry Tye, arXiv:hep-th/0610221; J. M. Cline, arXiv:hep-th/0612129; R. Kallosh, arXiv:hep-th/0702059.
  7. C. M. Hull, Print-86-0251-CAMBRIDGE; A. Strominger, Nucl. Phys. B274, 253 (1986).
  8. S. Gurrieri, J. Louis, A. Micu, and D. Waldram, Nucl. Phys. B654, 61 (2003).
  9. S. Kachru, M. B. Schulz, P. K. Tripathy, and S. P. Trivedi, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2003) 061.
  10. A. Dabholkar and C. Hull, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2003) 054; S. Hellerman, J. McGreevy, and B. Williams, 01 (2004) 024; A. Flournoy, B. Wecht, and B. Williams, Nucl. Phys. B706, 127 (2005).
  11. C. M. Hull, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2005) 065.
  12. J. Shelton, W. Taylor, and B. Wecht, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2005) 085.
  13. A. Dabholkar and C. Hull, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 009.
  14. G. Aldazábal, P. G. Cámara, A. Font, and L. E. Ibáñez, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 070.
  15. J. Shelton, W. Taylor, and B. Wecht, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2007) 095; A. Micu, E. Palti, and G. Tasinato, 03 (2007) 104.
  16. I. R. Klebanov and M. J. Strassler, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2000) 052.
  17. We are using the convention 4π2α=1.

  18. A. R. Frey and J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. D 65, 126009 (2002).
  19. M. Graña and J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. D 63, 026001 (2000).
  20. K. Becker and M. Becker, Nucl. Phys. B477, 155 (1996).
  21. T. H. Buscher, Phys. Lett. B 194, 59 (1987).
  22. Following the conventions in [3], for a p-form α on a manifold M we have that α*Mα=α·αdvolM.
  23. M. R. Douglas, arXiv:hep-th/9512077.
  24. C. Angelantonj, E. Dudas, and J. Mourad, Nucl. Phys. B637, 59 (2002).
  25. M. Mariño, R. Minasian, G. W. Moore, and A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2000) 005.
  26. S. F. Hassan, Nucl. Phys. B568, 145 (2000).
  27. A. R. Frey and M. Graña, Phys. Rev. D 68, 106002 (2003).
  28. L. Martucci and P. Smyth, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2005) 048.
  29. G. Dall’Agata, Nucl. Phys. B695, 243 (2004).
  30. S. Fidanza, R. Minasian, and A. Tomasiello, Commun. Math. Phys. 254, 401 (2005).
  31. I. Benmachiche and T. W. Grimm, Nucl. Phys. B748, 200 (2006); I. T. Ellwood, arXiv:hep-th/0612100.
  32. J. Gray and E. J. Hackett-Jones, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 071.
  33. M. Graña, J. Louis, and D. Waldram, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2007) 101.
  34. R. D’Auria, S. Ferrara, and M. Trigiante, arXiv:hep-th/0701247.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation