- Access by Xinjiang University
Testing explanations of the polarization puzzle
Phys. Rev. D 76, 034015 – Published 23 August, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.034015
Abstract
() is three separate decays, one for each polarization of the final-state vector mesons (one longitudinal, two transverse). It is observed that the fraction of transverse decays, , and the fraction of longitudinal decays, , are roughly equal: , in opposition to the naive expectation that . If one requires a single explanation of all polarization puzzles, two possibilities remain within the standard model: penguin annihilation and rescattering. In this paper we examine the predictions of these two explanations for in decays. In decays, only can possibly exhibit a large . In decays related by U-spin, we find two promising possibilities: (i) () and () and (ii) () and (). The measurement of in these pairs of decays will allow us to test penguin annihilation and rescattering. Finally, it is possible to distinguish penguin annihilation from rescattering by performing a time-dependent angular analysis of .
Article Text
References (30)
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 171802 (2003); K.-F. Chen et al. (Belle Collaboration), 91, 201801 (2003).
- W. M. Yao et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 33, 1 (2006); see p. 833 for review of polarization in decays.
- E. Barberio et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group), arXiv:0704.3575. online update at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag.
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 231804 (2004); 98, 051801 (2007); arXiv:0705.0398.
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), arXiv:0705.1798.
- K.-F. Chen et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 221804 (2005).
- P. Bussey et al. (CDF Collaboration), ICHEP-2006.
- J. Zhang et al. (BELLE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 141801 (2005).
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 201801 (2006).
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 74, 051102 (2006).
- A. L. Kagan, Phys. Lett. B 601, 151 (2004).
- For example, see P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, and T. N. Pham, Phys. Lett. B 597, 291 (2004); M. Ladisa, V. Laporta, G. Nardulli, and P. Santorelli, Phys. Rev. D 70, 114025 (2004); H. Y. Cheng, C. K. Chua, and A. Soni, 71, 014030 (2005).
- C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, I. Z. Rothstein, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 70, 054015 (2004); long-distance “charming penguin” effects from charm intermediate states were discussed earlier in M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, G. Martinelli, and L. Silvestrini, Nucl. Phys. B501, 271 (1997); M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, G. Martinelli, M. Pierini, and L. Silvestrini, Phys. Lett. B 515, 33 (2001).
- M. Beneke, J. Rohrer, and D. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 141801 (2006).
- W. S. Hou and M. Nagashima, arXiv:hep-ph/0408007.
- The relation between in and decays is also noted in S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, and J. Virto, arXiv:0705.0477.
- A. S. Dighe, I. Dunietz, H. J. Lipkin, and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Lett. B 369, 144 (1996); B. Tseng and C.-W. Chiang, arXiv:hep-ph/9905338.
- N. Sinha and R. Sinha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3706 (1998); C.-W. Chiang L. Wolfensteinand , Phys. Rev. D 61, 074031 (2000).
- M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1914 (1999); Nucl. Phys. B591, 313 (2000); B606, 245 (2001).
- Y. Y. Keum, H. n. Li, and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Lett. B 504, 6 (2001).
- H. n. Li and S. Mishima, Phys. Rev. D 71, 054025 (2005).
- J. Zhang et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 221801 (2003); B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), 97, 261801 (2006).
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), arXiv:0705.2157; A. Somov et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 171801 (2006).
- B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 111801 (2007).
- R. Godang et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 021802 (2001).
- M. Gronau, O. F. Hernandez, D. London, and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4529 (1994); 52, 6374 (1995).
- For a review of the angular analysis in decays, see A. Datta and D. London, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19, 2505 (2004).
- M. Gronau, Phys. Lett. B 492, 297 (2000). See also R. Fleischer, 459, 306 (1999); M. Nagashima, A. Szynkman, and D. London, arXiv:hep-ph/0701199; A. Datta and D. London, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2004) 072.
- N. Sinha and R. Sinha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3706 (1998); A. S. Dighe, I. Dunietz, and R. Fleischer, Eur. Phys. J. C 6, 647 (1999).
- Details of the time-dependent angular analysis can be found in, for example, A. Datta, M. Imbeault, D. London, V. Page, N. Sinha, and R. Sinha, Phys. Rev. D 71, 096002 (2005).