Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Testing explanations of the BϕK* polarization puzzle

Alakabha Datta1,*, Andrei V. Gritsan2,†, David London3,‡, Makiko Nagashima3,§, and Alejandro Szynkman3,∥

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, 108 Lewis Hall, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi 38677-1848, USA
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
  • 3Physique des Particules, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succ. centre-ville, Montréal, QC, Canada H3C 3J7

  • *datta@phy.olemiss.edu
  • gritsan@jhu.edu
  • london@lps.umontreal.ca
  • §makiko@lps.umontreal.ca
  • szynkman@lps.umontreal.ca

Phys. Rev. D 76, 034015 – Published 23 August, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.034015

Abstract

BϕK* (b¯s¯) is three separate decays, one for each polarization of the final-state vector mesons (one longitudinal, two transverse). It is observed that the fraction of transverse decays, fT, and the fraction of longitudinal decays, fL, are roughly equal: fT/fL1, in opposition to the naive expectation that fTfL. If one requires a single explanation of all polarization puzzles, two possibilities remain within the standard model: penguin annihilation and rescattering. In this paper we examine the predictions of these two explanations for fT/fL in b¯d¯ decays. In Bρρ decays, only Bd0ρ0ρ0 can possibly exhibit a large fT/fL. In B decays related by U-spin, we find two promising possibilities: (i) B+K*0ρ+ (b¯s¯) and B+K¯*0K*+ (b¯d¯) and (ii) BsK*0K¯*0 (b¯s¯) and Bd0K¯*0K*0 (b¯d¯). The measurement of fT/fL in these pairs of decays will allow us to test penguin annihilation and rescattering. Finally, it is possible to distinguish penguin annihilation from rescattering by performing a time-dependent angular analysis of Bd0K¯*0K*0.

Article Text

References (30)

  1. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 171802 (2003); K.-F. Chen et al. (Belle Collaboration), 91, 201801 (2003).
  2. W. M. Yao et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 33, 1 (2006); see p. 833 for review of polarization in B decays.
  3. E. Barberio et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group), arXiv:0704.3575. online update at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag.
  4. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 231804 (2004); 98, 051801 (2007); arXiv:0705.0398.
  5. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), arXiv:0705.1798.
  6. K.-F. Chen et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 221804 (2005).
  7. P. Bussey et al. (CDF Collaboration), ICHEP-2006.
  8. J. Zhang et al. (BELLE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 141801 (2005).
  9. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 201801 (2006).
  10. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 74, 051102 (2006).
  11. A. L. Kagan, Phys. Lett. B 601, 151 (2004).
  12. For example, see P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, and T. N. Pham, Phys. Lett. B 597, 291 (2004); M. Ladisa, V. Laporta, G. Nardulli, and P. Santorelli, Phys. Rev. D 70, 114025 (2004); H. Y. Cheng, C. K. Chua, and A. Soni, 71, 014030 (2005).
  13. C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, I. Z. Rothstein, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 70, 054015 (2004); long-distance “charming penguin” effects from charm intermediate states were discussed earlier in M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, G. Martinelli, and L. Silvestrini, Nucl. Phys. B501, 271 (1997); M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, G. Martinelli, M. Pierini, and L. Silvestrini, Phys. Lett. B 515, 33 (2001).
  14. M. Beneke, J. Rohrer, and D. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 141801 (2006).
  15. W. S. Hou and M. Nagashima, arXiv:hep-ph/0408007.
  16. The relation between fT/fL in b¯s¯ and b¯d¯ decays is also noted in S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, and J. Virto, arXiv:0705.0477.
  17. A. S. Dighe, I. Dunietz, H. J. Lipkin, and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Lett. B 369, 144 (1996); B. Tseng and C.-W. Chiang, arXiv:hep-ph/9905338.
  18. N. Sinha and R. Sinha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3706 (1998); C.-W. Chiang L. Wolfensteinand , Phys. Rev. D 61, 074031 (2000).
  19. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1914 (1999); Nucl. Phys. B591, 313 (2000); B606, 245 (2001).
  20. Y. Y. Keum, H. n. Li, and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Lett. B 504, 6 (2001).
  21. H. n. Li and S. Mishima, Phys. Rev. D 71, 054025 (2005).
  22. J. Zhang et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 221801 (2003); B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), 97, 261801 (2006).
  23. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), arXiv:0705.2157; A. Somov et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 171801 (2006).
  24. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 111801 (2007).
  25. R. Godang et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 021802 (2001).
  26. M. Gronau, O. F. Hernandez, D. London, and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 50, 4529 (1994); 52, 6374 (1995).
  27. For a review of the angular analysis in BV1V2 decays, see A. Datta and D. London, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19, 2505 (2004).
  28. M. Gronau, Phys. Lett. B 492, 297 (2000). See also R. Fleischer, 459, 306 (1999); M. Nagashima, A. Szynkman, and D. London, arXiv:hep-ph/0701199; A. Datta and D. London, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2004) 072.
  29. N. Sinha and R. Sinha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3706 (1998); A. S. Dighe, I. Dunietz, and R. Fleischer, Eur. Phys. J. C 6, 647 (1999).
  30. Details of the time-dependent angular analysis can be found in, for example, A. Datta, M. Imbeault, D. London, V. Page, N. Sinha, and R. Sinha, Phys. Rev. D 71, 096002 (2005).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation