Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Neutrino backgrounds to dark matter searches

Jocelyn Monroe*

Peter Fisher

  • Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

  • Laboratory for Nuclear Science, MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

  • *jmonroe@mit.edu

Phys. Rev. D 76, 033007 – Published 30 August, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.033007

Abstract

Neutrino coherent scattering cross sections can be as large as 1039cm2, while current dark matter experiments have sensitivities to WIMP coherent scattering cross sections 5 orders of magnitude smaller; future experiments plan to have sensitivities to cross sections as small as 1048cm2. With large target masses and few keV recoil energy detection thresholds, neutral current coherent scattering of solar neutrinos becomes an irreducible background in dark matter searches. In the current zero-background analysis paradigm, neutrino coherent scattering will limit the achievable sensitivity to dark matter scattering cross sections, at the level of 1046cm2.

Article Text

References (25)

  1. D. N. Spergel et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 148, 175 (2003).
  2. J. D. Lewin and P. F. Smith, Astropart. Phys. 6, 87 (1996).
  3. J. R. Ellis, K. A. Olive, Y. Santoso, and V. C. Spanos, Phys. Rev. D 71, 095007 (2005).
  4. R. J. Gaitskell, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 54, 315 (2004).
  5. S. Yellin, Phys. Rev. D 66, 032005 (2002).
  6. E. Aprile (Xenon10 Collaboration), APS 2007 April Meeting , arXiv:0706.0039 (unpublished).
  7. D. S. Akerib et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 011302 (2006).
  8. D. Z. Freedman, D. N. Schramm, and D. L. Tubbs, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 27, 167 (1977).
  9. A. Drukier and L. Stodolsky, Phys. Rev. D 30, 2295 (1984).
  10. K. Scholberg, Phys. Rev. D 73, 033005 (2006).
  11. C. J. Horowitz, K. J. Coakley, and D. N. McKinsey, Phys. Rev. D 68, 023005 (2003).
  12. B. Cabrera, L. M. Krauss, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 25 (1985).
  13. A. K. Drukier, K. Freese, and D. N. Spergel, Phys. Rev. D 33, 3495 (1986).
  14. J. N. Bahcall, A. M. Serenelli, S. Basuand , Astrophys. J. 621, L85 (2005).
  15. S. Enomoto, Ph.D. thesis, Tohoku University, 2005, http://www.awa.tohoku.ac.jp/KamLAND/publications/ Sanshiro_thesis.pdf.
  16. T. K. Gaisser and M. Honda, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 52, 153 (2002).
  17. K. Nakajima, K. Inoue, K. Owada, F. Suekane, A. Suzuki, G. Hirano, S. Kosaka, T. Ohta, and H. Tanaka, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 569, 837 (2006).
  18. S. Ando, K. Sato, and T. Totani, Nucl. Phys. A721, C541 (2003).
  19. B. Aharmim et al., Phys. Rev. C 75, 045502 (2007).
  20. J. Hosaka et al., Phys. Rev. D 73, 112001 (2006).
  21. T. Araki et al., Nature (London) 436, 499 (2005).
  22. Y. Ashie et al., Phys. Rev. D 71, 112005 (2005).
  23. M. Honda, T. Kajita, K. Kasahara, and S. Midorikawa, Phys. Rev. D 64, 053011 (2001).
  24. J. N. Bahcall, M. Kamionkowski, and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6146 (1995).
  25. C. J. Horowitz and B. D. Serot, Nucl. Phys. A368, 503 (1981).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation