Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Weak pion production off the nucleon

E. Hernández1, J. Nieves2, and M. Valverde2

  • 1Grupo de Física Nuclear, Departamento de Física Fundamental e IUFFyM, Universidad de Salamanca, E-37008 Salamanca, Spain.
  • 2Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain

Phys. Rev. D 76, 033005 – Published 23 August, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.033005

Abstract

We develop a model for the weak pion production off the nucleon, which besides the delta pole mechanism [weak excitation of the Δ(1232) resonance and its subsequent decay into Nπ], includes also some background terms required by chiral symmetry. We refit the C5A(q2) form factor to the flux-averaged νμpμpπ+ ANL q2-differential cross section data, finding a substantially smaller contribution of the delta pole mechanism than traditionally assumed in the literature. Within this scheme, we calculate several differential and integrated cross sections, including pion angular distributions, induced by neutrinos and antineutrinos and driven both by charged and neutral currents. In all cases we find that the background terms produce quite significant effects, and that they lead to an overall improved description of the data, as compared to the case where only the delta pole mechanism is considered. We also show that the interference between the delta pole and the background terms produces parity-violating contributions to the pion angular differential cross section, which are intimately linked to T-odd correlations in the contraction between the leptonic and hadronic tensors. However, these latter correlations do not imply a genuine violation of time-reversal invariance because of the existence of strong final state interaction effects.

Article Text

References (51)

  1. M. Honda, T. Kajita, K. Kasahara, and S. Midorikawa, Phys. Rev. D 52, 4985 (1995).
  2. F. Vissani and A. Yu. Smirnov, Phys. Lett. B 432, 376 (1998).
  3. S. Nakayama et al., Phys. Lett. B 619, 255 (2005).
  4. J. L. Raaf, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 139, 47 (2005).
  5. J. Nieves, J. E. Amaro, and M. Valverde, Phys. Rev. C 70, 055503 (2004); 72, 019902(E) (2005).
  6. M. Valverde, J. E. Amaro, and J. Nieves, Phys. Lett. B 638, 325 (2006).
  7. J. Nieves, M. Valverde, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. C 73, 025504 (2006).
  8. S. L. Adler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 50, 189 (1968).
  9. C. H. Llewellyn Smith, Phys. Rep. 3C, 261 (1972).
  10. P. A. Schreiner and F. von Hippel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 339 (1973).
  11. G. L. Fogli and G. Nardulli, Nucl. Phys. B160, 116 (1979).
  12. G. L. Fogli and G. Nardulli,Nucl. Phys. B165, 162 (1980).
  13. L. Alvarez-Ruso, S. K. Singh, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. C 57, 2693 (1998).
  14. L. Alvarez-Ruso, S. K. Singh, and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. C 59, 3386 (1999).
  15. T. Sato, D. Uno, and T. S. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. C 67, 065201 (2003).
  16. E. A. Paschos, J.-Y. Yu, and M. Sakuda, Phys. Rev. D 69, 014013 (2004).
  17. O. Lalakulich and E. A. Paschos, Phys. Rev. D 71, 074003 (2005).
  18. T. Leitner, L. Alvarez-Ruso, and U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C 73, 065502 (2006).
  19. O. Lalakulich, E. A. Paschos, and G. Piranishvili, Phys. Rev. D 74, 014009 (2006).
  20. G. M. Radecky et al., Phys. Rev. D 25, 1161 (1982).
  21. T. Kitagaki et al., Phys. Rev. D 34, 2554 (1986).
  22. S. Galster et al., Nucl. Phys. B32, 221 (1971).
  23. T. Ericson and W. Weise, Pions and Nuclei (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988).
  24. Th. Wilbois, P. Wilhelm, and H. Arenhovel, Phys. Rev. C 57, 295 (1998); A. J. Buchmann, E. Hernández, and A. Faessler, 55, 448 (1997); O. Hanstein, D. Drechsel, and L. Tiator, Phys. Lett. B 385, 45 (1996); M. Benmerrouche and N. C. Mukhopadhyay, Phys. Rev. D 46, 101 (1992), and references therein.
  25. K. Joo et al. (CLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 122001 (2002).
  26. J. Campbell et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 335 (1973).
  27. S. J. Barish et al., Phys. Rev. D 19, 2521 (1979).
  28. T. Kitagaki et al., Phys. Rev. D 42, 1331 (1990).
  29. P. Salin, Nuovo Cimento A 48, 506 (1967); J. Bijtebier, Nucl. Phys. B21, 158 (1970).
  30. C. Alexandrou, Th. Leontiou, J. W. Negele, and A. Tsapalis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 052003 (2007).
  31. A. Gil, J. Nieves, E. Osetand , Nucl. Phys. A627, 543 (1997).
  32. E. Hernández, J. Nieves, and M. Valverde, Phys. Lett. B 647, 452 (2007).
  33. W. M. Alberico, S. M. Bilenky, C. Giunti, and C. Maieron, Z. Phys. C 70, 463 (1996).
  34. G. T. Garvey, W. C. Louis, and D. H. White, Phys. Rev. C 48, 761 (1993).
  35. A. Gómez-Nicola, J. Nieves, J. R. Pelaez, and E. Ruiz-Arriola, Phys. Lett. B 486, 77 (2000); Phys. Rev. D 69, 076007 (2004).
  36. J. Nieves, M. Pavon-Valderrama, and E. Ruiz-Arriola, Phys. Rev. D 65, 036002 (2002).
  37. S. J. Barish et al., Phys. Rev. D 16, 3103 (1977).
  38. N. J. Baker et al., Phys. Rev. D 23, 2499 (1981).
  39. T. Bolognese, J. P. Engel, J. L. Guyonnet, and J. L. Riester et al., Phys. Lett. B 81, 393 (1979).
  40. J. Bell et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1012 (1978).
  41. P. Allen et al., Nucl. Phys. B264, 221 (1986).
  42. J. Liu, N. C. Mukhopadhyay, and L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 52, 1630 (1995).
  43. K. M. Watson, Phys. Rev. 95, 228 (1954).
  44. M. Sajjad Athar, S. Ahmad, and S. K. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 75, 093003 (2007).
  45. G. Karpman, R. Leonardi, and F. Strocchi, Phys. Rev. 174, 1957 (1968).
  46. F. Cannata, R. Leonardi, and F. Strocchi, Phys. Rev. D 1, 191 (1970).
  47. W. Krenz et al., Nucl. Phys. B135, 45 (1978).
  48. M. Derrick et al., Phys. Lett. B 92, 363 (1980); 95, 461(E) (1980).
  49. M. Derrick et al., Phys. Rev. D 23, 569 (1981).
  50. E. A. Hawker, in Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions in the Few GeV Region, Irvine, California, 2002, http://www.ps.uci.edu/~nuint/proceedings/hawker.pdf.
  51. E. Hernández, J. Nieves, S. K. Singh, M. Valverde, and M. J. Vicente-Vacas (unpublished).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation