Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Signature of heavy Majorana neutrinos at a linear collider: Enhanced charged Higgs pair production

David Atwood1,*, Shaouly Bar-Shalom2,†, and Amarjit Soni3,‡

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
  • 2Physics Department, Technion-Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
  • 3Theory Group, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA

  • *atwood@iastate.edu
  • shaouly@physics.technion.ac.il
  • soni@bnl.gov

Phys. Rev. D 76, 033004 – Published 21 August, 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.033004

Abstract

A charged Higgs pair can be produced at an ee collider through a t-channel exchange of a heavy neutrino (N) via e+eH+H and, if N is a Majorana particle, also via the lepton number violating (LNV) like-sign reaction e±e±H±H±. Assuming no a priori relation between the effective eNH+ coupling (ξ) and light neutrino masses, we show that this interaction vertex can give a striking enhancement to these charged Higgs pair production processes. In particular, the LNV HH signal can probe N at the International Linear Collider (ILC) in the mass range 100GeVmN104TeV and with the effective mixing angle ξ in the range 104ξ2108—well within its perturbative unitarity bound and the ββ0ν limit. The lepton number conserving e+eH+H mode can be sensitive to, e.g., an O(10)TeV heavy Majorana neutrino at a 500 GeV ILC, if ξ20.001.

Article Text

References (19)

  1. For a recent overview on nonminimal seesawlike models see, J. W. F. Valle, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 53, 473 (2006).
  2. F. del Aguila and M. Zralek, Acta Phys. Pol. B 33, 2585 (2002); F. del Aguila, M. Masip, and J. L. Padilla, Phys. Lett. B 627, 131 (2005).
  3. E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 73, 077301 (2006).
  4. A. Pilaftsis, Z. Phys. C 55, 275 (1992); D. Tommasini et al., Nucl. Phys. B444, 451 (1995); J. Gluza, Acta Phys. Pol. B 33, 1735 (2002).
  5. For recent reviews see e.g.: A. S. Barabash, JINST 1, P07002 (2006); P. Vogel, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57, 177 (2006).
  6. F. del Aguila, J. A. Aguilar Saavedra, and R. Pittau, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 53, 506 (2006).
  7. H. Tso-Hsiu, C. Cheng-Rui, and T. Zhi-Jian, Phys. Rev. D 42, 2265 (1990); D. A. Dicus and D. D. Karatas, 44, 2033 (1991); A. Datta, M. Guchait, and D. P. Roy, 47, 961 (1993); A. Ferrari et al., 62, 013001 (2000).
  8. A. Ali, A. V. Borisov, and N. B. Zamorin, Eur. Phys. J. C 21, 123 (2001).
  9. F. M. L. Almeida et al., Phys. Rev. D 62, 075004 (2000).
  10. T. Han and B. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 171804 (2006).
  11. W. Buchmüller and C. Greub, Nucl. Phys. B363, 345 (1991); F. M. L. Almeida et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 30, 327 (2003).
  12. T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Lett. B 116, 23 (1982); arXiv:hep-ph/9501261; G. Belanger et al., Phys. Rev. D 53, 6292 (1996).
  13. S. Bray, J. S. Lee, and A. Pilaftsis, Phys. Lett. B 628, 250 (2005).
  14. M. Flanz, W. Rodejohann, K. Zuberand , Phys. Lett. B 473, 324 (2000); 480, 418(E) (2000); A. Ali, A. V. Borisov, and D. V. Zhuridov, arXiv:hep-ph/0512005.
  15. S. Bar-Shalom et al., Phys. Lett. B 643, 342 (2006).
  16. S. Bergmann and A. Kagan, Nucl. Phys. B538, 368 (1999).
  17. For a recent analysis of the ββ0ν bound see e.g., P. Benes et al., Phys. Rev. D 71, 077901 (2005).
  18. See e.g., S. Komamiya, Phys. Rev. D 38, 2158 (1988); A. Djouadi et al., Z. Phys. C 74, 93 (1997).
  19. See e.g., the LEP Collaborations and the LEP Electroweak Working Group, arXiv:hep-ex/0612034.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation