Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Vortices, symmetry breaking, and temporary confinement in SU(2) gauge-Higgs theory

J. Greensite1 and Š. Olejník2

  • 1Physics and Astronomy Department, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 94117, USA
  • 2Institute of Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, SK-845 11 Bratislava, Slovakia

Phys. Rev. D 74, 014502 – Published 5 July, 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.014502

Abstract

We further investigate center vortex percolation and Coulomb gauge remnant symmetry breaking in the SU(2) gauge-Higgs model. We show that string breaking is visible in Polyakov line correlators on the center-projected lattice, that our usual numerical tests successfully relate P-vortices to center vortices, and that vortex removal removes the linear potential, as in the pure-gauge theory. This data suggests that global center symmetry is not essential to the vortex confinement mechanism. But we also find that the line of vortex percolation-depercolation transitions, and the line of remnant symmetry-breaking transitions, do not coincide in the SU(2)-Higgs phase diagram. This nonuniqueness of transition lines associated with nonlocal order parameters favors a straightforward interpretation of the Fradkin-Shenker theorem, namely: there is no unambiguous distinction, in the SU(2) gauge-Higgs models, between a “confining” phase and a Higgs phase.

Article Text

References (14)

  1. J. Greensite, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 1 (2003).
  2. P. de Forcrand and O. Jahn, Nucl. Phys. B651, 125 (2003).
  3. R. Bertle, M. Faber, J. Greensite, and Š. Olejník, Phys. Rev. D 69, 014007 (2004).
  4. J. Greensite, Š. Olejník, and D. Zwanziger, Phys. Rev. D 69, 074506 (2004).
  5. C. Lang, C. Rebbi, and M. Virasoro, Phys. Lett. B 104, 294 (1981).
  6. E. Fradkin and S. Shenker, Phys. Rev. D 19, 3682 (1979); K. Osterwalder and E. Seiler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 110, 440 (1978).
  7. G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B138, 1 (1978).
  8. P. de Forcrand and M. D’Elia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4582 (1999).
  9. J. Kertész, Physica A (Amsterdam) 161, 58 (1989).
  10. S. Elitzur, Phys. Rev. D 12, 3978 (1975).
  11. K. Langfeld, in Proceedings of International Conference on Strong and Electroweak Matter, Heidelberg, Germany, 2002, edited by M. Schmidt (World Scientific, Singapore, 2003), p. 302.
  12. A. Di Giacomo et al., Phys. Rev. D 61, 034503 (2000).
  13. D. Zwanziger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 102001 (2003).
  14. M. N. Chernodub, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 252002 (2005); M. N. Chernodub, F. V. Gubarev, E.-M. Ilgenfritz, and A. Schiller, Phys. Lett. B 434, 83 (1998).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation