Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Measurement of the direct photon momentum spectrum in Υ(1S), Υ(2S), and Υ(3S) decays

D. Besson1, S. Henderson1, T. K. Pedlar2, D. Cronin-Hennessy3, K. Y. Gao3, D. T. Gong3, J. Hietala3, Y. Kubota3, T. Klein3 et al. (CLEO Collaboration)

T. Klein3, B. W. Lang3, S. Z. Li3, R. Poling3, A. W. Scott3, A. Smith3, S. Dobbs4, Z. Metreveli4, K. K. Seth4, A. Tomaradze4, P. Zweber4, J. Ernst5, K. Arms6, H. Severini7, D. M. Asner8, S. A. Dytman8, W. Love8, S. Mehrabyan8, J. A. Mueller8, V. Savinov8, Z. Li9, A. Lopez9, H. Mendez9, J. Ramirez9, G. S. Huang10, D. H. Miller10, V. Pavlunin10, B. Sanghi10, I. P. J. Shipsey10, G. S. Adams11, M. Cravey11, J. P. Cummings11, I. Danko11, J. Napolitano11, Q. He12, H. Muramatsu12, C. S. Park12, E. H. Thorndike12, T. E. Coan13, Y. S. Gao13, F. Liu13, R. Stroynowski13, M. Artuso14, C. Boulahouache14, S. Blusk14, J. Butt14, O. Dorjkhaidav14, J. Li14, N. Menaa14, G. Moneti14, R. Mountain14, R. Nandakumar14, K. Randrianarivony14, R. Redjimi14, R. Sia14, T. Skwarnicki14, S. Stone14, J. C. Wang14, K. Zhang14, S. E. Csorna15, G. Bonvicini16, D. Cinabro16, M. Dubrovin16, A. Bornheim17, S. P. Pappas17, A. J. Weinstein17, R. A. Briere18, G. P. Chen18, J. Chen18, T. Ferguson18, G. Tatishvili18, H. Vogel18, M. E. Watkins18, J. L. Rosner19, N. E. Adam20, J. P. Alexander20, K. Berkelman20, D. G. Cassel20, V. Crede20, J. E. Duboscq20, K. M. Ecklund20, R. Ehrlich20, L. Fields20, R. S. Galik20, L. Gibbons20, B. Gittelman20, R. Gray20, S. W. Gray20, D. L. Hartill20, B. K. Heltsley20, D. Hertz20, C. D. Jones20, J. Kandaswamy20, D. L. Kreinick20, V. E. Kuznetsov20, H. Mahlke-Krüger20, T. O. Meyer20, P. U. E. Onyisi20, J. R. Patterson20, D. Peterson20, E. A. Phillips20, J. Pivarski20, D. Riley20, A. Ryd20, A. J. Sadoff20, H. Schwarthoff20, X. Shi20, M. R. Shepherd20, S. Stroiney20, W. M. Sun20, D. Urner20, T. Wilksen20, K. M. Weaver20, M. Weinberger20, S. B. Athar21, P. Avery21, L. Breva-Newell21, R. Patel21, V. Potlia21, H. Stoeck21, J. Yelton21, P. Rubin22, C. Cawlfield23, B. I. Eisenstein23, G. D. Gollin23, I. Karliner23, D. Kim23, N. Lowrey23, P. Naik23, C. Sedlack23, M. Selen23, E. J. White23, J. Williams23, J. Wiss23, and K. W. Edwards24 (CLEO Collaboration)

  • 1University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA
  • 2Luther College, Decorah, Iowa 52101, USA
  • 3University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
  • 4Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
  • 5State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York 12222, USA
  • 6Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
  • 7University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA
  • 8University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
  • 9University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico 00681
  • 10Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
  • 11Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180, USA
  • 12University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA
  • 13Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275, USA
  • 14Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA
  • 15Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA
  • 16Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA
  • 17California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
  • 18Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
  • 19Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 20Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
  • 21University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA
  • 22George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, USA
  • 23University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 61801, USA
  • 24Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6, and the Institute of Particle Physics, Montreal, Canada

Phys. Rev. D 74, 012003 – Published 14 July, 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.012003

Abstract

Using data taken with the CLEO III detector at the Cornell Electron Storage Ring, we have investigated the direct photon spectrum in the decays Υ(1S)γgg, Υ(2S)γgg, Υ(3S)γgg. The latter two of these are first measurements. Our analysis procedures differ from previous ones in the following ways: (a) background estimates (primarily from π0 decays) are based on isospin symmetry rather than a determination of the π0 spectrum, which permits measurement of the Υ(2S) and Υ(3S) direct photon spectra without explicit corrections for π0 backgrounds from, e.g., χbJ states, (b) we estimate the branching fractions with a parametrized functional form (exponential) used for the background, and c) we use the high-statistics sample of Υ(2S)ππΥ(1S) to obtain a tagged sample of Υ(1S)γ+X events, for which there are no QED backgrounds. We determine values for the ratio of the inclusive direct photon decay rate to that of the dominant three-gluon decay Υggg(Rγ=B(ggγ)/B(ggg)) to be Rγ(1S)=(2.70±0.01±0.13±0.24)%, Rγ(2S)=(3.18±0.04±0.22±0.41)%, and Rγ(3S)=(2.72±0.06±0.32±0.37)%, where the errors shown are statistical, systematic, and theoretical model dependent, respectively. Given a value of Q2, one can estimate a value for the strong coupling constant αs(Q2) from Rγ.

Article Text

References (34)

  1. S. J. Brodsky, G. P. Lepage, and P. B. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. D 28, 228 (1983).
  2. G. S. Adams et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 012001 (2005).
  3. S. J. Brodsky, T. A. DeGrand, R. R. Horgan, and D. G. Coyne, Phys. Lett. 73B, 203 (1978).
  4. K. Koller and T. Walsh, Nucl. Phys. B140, 449 (1978).
  5. R. D. Field, Phys. Lett. 133B, 248 (1983).
  6. R. D. Schamberger et al. (CUSB Collaboration), Phys. Lett. 138B, 225 (1984).
  7. S. E. Csorna et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1222 (1986).
  8. D. M. Photiadis, Phys. Lett. 164B, 160 (1985).
  9. A. Bizzeti et al. (Crystal Ball Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 267, 286 (1991).
  10. H. Albrecht et al. (ARGUS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 199, 291 (1987).
  11. B. Nemati et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 55, 5273 (1997).
  12. S. Catani and F. Hautmann, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 39, 359 (1995).
  13. M. Yusuf and P. Hoodbhoy, Phys. Rev. D 54, 3345 (1996).
  14. S. Fleming and A. Leibovich, Phys. Rev. D 67, 074035 (2003); Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 032001 (2003).
  15. S. Fleming and A. Leibovich, Phys. Rev. D 68, 094011 (2003).
  16. X. Garcia i Tormo and J. Soto, Phys. Rev. D 69, 114006 (2004); 72, 054014 (2005); Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111801 (2006).
  17. X. Garcia (private communication).
  18. Y. Kubota et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 320, 66 (1992).
  19. D. Peterson et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 478, 142 (2002).
  20. M. Artuso et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 502, 91 (2003).
  21. T. M. Yan, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1652 (1980).
  22. S. Eidelman et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Lett. B 592, 1 (2004) [and 2005 partial update].
  23. S. B. Athar et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 012001 (2005).
  24. H. Albrecht et al. (ARGUS Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 54, 13 (1992).
  25. R. Ammar et al., Phys. Rev. D 57, 1350 (1998).
  26. M. Artuso et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 032001 (2005).
  27. P. B. Mackenzie and G. Peter Lepage, in Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics, AIP Conf. Proc. (AIP, New York, 1981).
  28. S. Sanghera, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9, 5743 (1994).
  29. W. A. Bardeen et al., Phys. Rev. D 18, 3998 (1978).
  30. P. B. Mackenzie and G. Peter Lepage, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1244 (1981).
  31. G. Grunberg, Phys. Lett. 95B, 70 (1980).
  32. P. M. Stevenson, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2916 (1981).
  33. S. A. Larin, T. van Ritbergen, and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Phys. Lett. B 400, 379 (1997).
  34. A. C. Benvenuti (BCDMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 223, 490 (1989).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation