- Access by Xinjiang University
Measurement of the direct photon momentum spectrum in , , and decays
Phys. Rev. D 74, 012003 – Published 14 July, 2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.012003
Abstract
Using data taken with the CLEO III detector at the Cornell Electron Storage Ring, we have investigated the direct photon spectrum in the decays , , . The latter two of these are first measurements. Our analysis procedures differ from previous ones in the following ways: (a) background estimates (primarily from decays) are based on isospin symmetry rather than a determination of the spectrum, which permits measurement of the and direct photon spectra without explicit corrections for backgrounds from, e.g., states, (b) we estimate the branching fractions with a parametrized functional form (exponential) used for the background, and c) we use the high-statistics sample of to obtain a tagged sample of events, for which there are no QED backgrounds. We determine values for the ratio of the inclusive direct photon decay rate to that of the dominant three-gluon decay to be , , and , where the errors shown are statistical, systematic, and theoretical model dependent, respectively. Given a value of , one can estimate a value for the strong coupling constant from .
Article Text
References (34)
- S. J. Brodsky, G. P. Lepage, and P. B. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. D 28, 228 (1983).
- G. S. Adams et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 012001 (2005).
- S. J. Brodsky, T. A. DeGrand, R. R. Horgan, and D. G. Coyne, Phys. Lett. 73B, 203 (1978).
- K. Koller and T. Walsh, Nucl. Phys. B140, 449 (1978).
- R. D. Field, Phys. Lett. 133B, 248 (1983).
- R. D. Schamberger et al. (CUSB Collaboration), Phys. Lett. 138B, 225 (1984).
- S. E. Csorna et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1222 (1986).
- D. M. Photiadis, Phys. Lett. 164B, 160 (1985).
- A. Bizzeti et al. (Crystal Ball Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 267, 286 (1991).
- H. Albrecht et al. (ARGUS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 199, 291 (1987).
- B. Nemati et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 55, 5273 (1997).
- S. Catani and F. Hautmann, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 39, 359 (1995).
- M. Yusuf and P. Hoodbhoy, Phys. Rev. D 54, 3345 (1996).
- S. Fleming and A. Leibovich, Phys. Rev. D 67, 074035 (2003); Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 032001 (2003).
- S. Fleming and A. Leibovich, Phys. Rev. D 68, 094011 (2003).
- X. Garcia i Tormo and J. Soto, Phys. Rev. D 69, 114006 (2004); 72, 054014 (2005); Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111801 (2006).
- X. Garcia (private communication).
- Y. Kubota et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 320, 66 (1992).
- D. Peterson et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 478, 142 (2002).
- M. Artuso et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 502, 91 (2003).
- T. M. Yan, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1652 (1980).
- S. Eidelman et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Lett. B 592, 1 (2004) [and 2005 partial update].
- S. B. Athar et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 012001 (2005).
- H. Albrecht et al. (ARGUS Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 54, 13 (1992).
- R. Ammar et al., Phys. Rev. D 57, 1350 (1998).
- M. Artuso et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 032001 (2005).
- P. B. Mackenzie and G. Peter Lepage, in Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics, AIP Conf. Proc. (AIP, New York, 1981).
- S. Sanghera, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9, 5743 (1994).
- W. A. Bardeen et al., Phys. Rev. D 18, 3998 (1978).
- P. B. Mackenzie and G. Peter Lepage, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1244 (1981).
- G. Grunberg, Phys. Lett. 95B, 70 (1980).
- P. M. Stevenson, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2916 (1981).
- S. A. Larin, T. van Ritbergen, and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Phys. Lett. B 400, 379 (1997).
- A. C. Benvenuti (BCDMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 223, 490 (1989).