Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Non-Abelian semilocal strings in N=2 supersymmetric QCD

M. Shifman1 and A. Yung1,2,3

  • 1William I. Fine Theoretical Physics Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
  • 2Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, St. Petersburg 188300, Russia
  • 3Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow 117259, Russia

Phys. Rev. D 73, 125012 – Published 12 June, 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.125012

Abstract

We consider a benchmark bulk theory in four dimensions: N=2 supersymmetric QCD with the gauge group U(N) and Nf flavors of fundamental matter hypermultiplets (quarks). The nature of the Bogomol’nyi-Prasad-Sommerfield (BPS) strings in this benchmark theory crucially depends on Nf. If NfN and all quark masses are equal, it supports non-Abelian BPS strings which have internal (orientational) moduli. If Nf>N these strings become semilocal, developing additional moduli ρ related to (unlimited) variations of their transverse size. Using the U(2) gauge group with Nf=3, 4 as an example, we derive an effective low-energy theory on the (two-dimensional) string world sheet. Our derivation is field theoretic, direct and explicit: we first analyze the Bogomol’nyi equations for string-geometry solitons, suggest an ansatz, and solve it at large ρ. Then we use this solution to obtain the world-sheet theory. In the semiclassical limit our result confirms the Hanany-Tong conjecture, which rests on brane-based arguments, that the world-sheet theory is an N=2 supersymmetric U(1) gauge theory with N positively and Ne=NfN negatively charged matter multiplets and the Fayet-Iliopoulos term determined by the four-dimensional coupling constant. We conclude that the Higgs branch of this model is not lifted by quantum effects. As a result, such strings cannot confine. Our analysis of infrared effects, not seen in the Hanany-Tong consideration, shows that, in fact, the derivative expansion can make sense only provided that the theory under consideration is regularized in the infrared, e.g. by the quark mass differences. The world-sheet action discussed in this paper becomes a bona fide low-energy effective action only if ΔmAB0.

Article Text

References (52)

  1. A. Hanany and D. Tong, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2003) 037.
  2. R. Auzzi, S. Bolognesi, J. Evslin, K. Konishi, and A. Yung, Nucl. Phys. B673, 187 (2003).
  3. M. Shifman and A. Yung, Phys. Rev. D 70, 045004 (2004).
  4. A. Hanany and D. Tong, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2004) 066.
  5. D. Tong, Phys. Rev. D 69, 065003 (2004).
  6. M. Shifman and A. Yung, Phys. Rev. D 70, 025013 (2004).
  7. Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, and N. Sakai, Phys. Rev. D 71, 065018 (2005); M. Eto, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, and N. Sakai, hep-th/0602289.
  8. V. Markov, A. Marshakov, and A. Yung, Nucl. Phys. B709, 267 (2005).
  9. R. Auzzi, S. Bolognesi, and J. Evslin, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2005) 046.
  10. M. Eto, M. Nitta, and N. Sakai, Nucl. Phys. B701, 247 (2004).
  11. A. Hanany and K. Hashimoto, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2005) 021; K. Hashimoto and D. Tong, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2005) 004.
  12. N. Sakai and D. Tong, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2005) 019.
  13. M. Shifman and A. Yung, Phys. Rev. D 72, 085017 (2005).
  14. R. Auzzi, M. Shifman, and A. Yung, Phys. Rev. D 72, 025002 (2005).
  15. M. Eto, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, and N. Sakai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 161601 (2006); R. Auzzi, M. Shifman, and A. Yung, hep-th/0511150.
  16. D. Tong, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2006) 030.
  17. D. Tong, hep-th/0509216.
  18. M. Eto, Y. Isozumi, M. Nitta, K. Ohashi, and N. Sakai, hep-th/0602170.
  19. H. J. de Vega and F. A. Schaposnik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2564 (1986); Phys. Rev. D 34, 3206 (1986).
  20. J. Heo and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 58, 065011 (1998).
  21. P. Suranyi, Phys. Lett. B 481, 136 (2000).
  22. F. A. Schaposnik and P. Suranyi, Phys. Rev. D 62, 125002 (2000).
  23. M. Kneipp and P. Brockill, Phys. Rev. D 64, 125012 (2001).
  24. K. Konishi and L. Spanu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18, 249 (2003).
  25. A. Marshakov and A. Yung, Nucl. Phys. B647, 3 (2002).
  26. A. Abrikosov, Sov. Phys. JETP 32, 1442 (1957) [Reprinted in A. AbrikosovSolitons and Particles, edited by C. Rebbi and G. Soliani (World Scientific, Singapore, 1984), p. 356]; H. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B61, 45 (1973) [Reprinted in H. NielsenP. OlesenSolitons and Particles, edited by C. Rebbi and G. Soliani (World Scientific, Singapore, 1984), p. 365].
  27. A. Achucarro and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rep. 327, 347 (2000).
  28. P. Fayet and J. Iliopoulos, Phys. Lett. B 51, 461 (1974).
  29. B. J. Schroers, Nucl. Phys. B475, 440 (1996).
  30. A. Hanany, M. J. Strassler, and A. Zaffaroni, Nucl. Phys. B513, 87 (1998).
  31. A. I. Vainshtein and A. Yung, Nucl. Phys. B614, 3 (2001).
  32. K. Bardakci and M. B. Halpern, Phys. Rev. D 6, 696 (1972).
  33. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B426, 19 (1994); B430, 485(E) (1994).
  34. P. Argyres, M. Plesser, and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B471, 159 (1996).
  35. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B431, 484 (1994).
  36. A. A. Penin, V. A. Rubakov, P. G. Tinyakov, and S. V. Troitsky, Phys. Lett. B 389, 13 (1996).
  37. K. Evlampiev and A. Yung, Nucl. Phys. B662, 120 (2003).
  38. M. Hindmarsh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1263 (1992).
  39. E. B. Bogomolny, Yad. Fiz. 24, 861 (1976) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 24, 449 (1976)]; [Reprinted in E. B. BogomolnySolitons and Particles, edited by C. Rebbi and G. Soliani (World Scientific, Singapore, 1984), p. 389].
  40. R. A. Leese and T. M. Samols, Nucl. Phys. B396, 639 (1993).
  41. R. A. Leese, Phys. Rev. D 46, 4677 (1992).
  42. R. S. Ward, Phys. Lett. B 158, 424 (1985).
  43. K. S. Narain, Nucl. Phys. B243, 131 (1984).
  44. A. Yung, Nucl. Phys. B562, 191 (1999).
  45. L. Alvarez-Gaumé and D. Z. Freedman, Commun. Math. Phys. 91, 87 (1983); S. J. Gates, Nucl. Phys. B238, 349 (1984); S. J. Gates, C. M. Hull, and M. Roček, B248, 157 (1984).
  46. V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Rep. 116, 103 (1984).
  47. N. Dorey, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (1998) 005.
  48. M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, and R. Zwicky, hep-th/0602004.
  49. G. ’t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B79, 276 (1974); A. M. Polyakov, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 430 (1974) [JETP Lett. 20, 194 (1974)].
  50. N. Dorey, T. Hollowood, and D. Tong, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (1999) 006.
  51. E. Witten, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (1997) 003.
  52. H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B641, 3 (2002).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation