- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Carrier mode selective working point and side band imbalance in LIGO I

Erika D’Ambrosio and William Kells

  • California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 73, 122002 – Published 5 June, 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.122002

Abstract

In gravitational wave interferometers, the input laser beam is phase modulated to generate radio-frequency side bands that are used to lock the cavities. The mechanism is the following: the frequency of the side bands and the carrier is chosen in such a way that their response to small changes of the longitudinal degrees of freedom is different. This difference is therefore monitored and it serves as an error signal for controlling the optical cavity lengths, as they are linearly related to the set of observed phases between carrier and side bands. Among the others, one longitudinal degree of freedom is optimally sensitive to the space-time distortions propagating through the cosmos, as predicted by the general theory of relativity. The observation of the astrophysical signal relies on the measurement of that specific degree of freedom. The entire problem is more complex when the transverse degrees of freedom are taken into account, because the relative phase between the fields also depends on their overlap. In order to establish an unambiguous relation between length changes and phase measurements, there must be one circulating optical mode and the only difference between carrier and side bands must be their amplitude. We will show that the variability of the transverse degrees of freedom and their different actions on carrier and side band fields puts a severe limit on this assumption. Unless the system is made of perfect and perfectly matched optical cavities, it is never governed by one unique coherent state and any adjustment of the optical lengths results from a compromise between the lengths that are optimal for the carrier field and the side band ones. Such a compromise alters the correspondence between error signals and cavity lengths, calculated in the one-dimensional treatment. We assess the strength of this effect and relate it to the sensitivity of the instrument (which relies on the reconstruction of that correspondence) in realistic circumstances.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (23)

  1. Ron Drever et al., Appl. Phys. B 31, 97 (1983).
  2. C. J. Walsh et al., Appl. Opt. 31, 2870 (1999).
  3. A. E. Siegman, Lasers (University Science Books, Sausalito, CA, 1986).
  4. D. Sigg et al., Appl. Opt. 40, 4988 (2001).
  5. Y. Hefetz, N. Mavalvala, and D. Sigg, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14, 1597 (1997); See also P960024 available from the LIGO Document Search Tool on http://www.ligo.org.
  6. R. Beausoleil and D. Sigg, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 16, 2990 (1999).
  7. R. Beausoleil et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 1247 (2003).
  8. M. Evans et al., Opt. Lett. 27, 598 (2002).
  9. A. Kostenbauder et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 1780 (1997).
  10. B. Bochner and Y. Hefetz, Phys. Rev. D 68, 082001 (2003).
  11. P. Fritschel et al., Appl. Opt. 37, 6734 (1998).
  12. D. E. McClelland et al., Opt. Lett. 24, 1014 (1999).
  13. A. Giazotto, Phys. Rep. 182, 365 (1989).
  14. C. W. Misner, J. A. Wheeler, and K. S. Thorne, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973).
  15. P. R. Saulson, Fundamentals of Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detectors (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
  16. J. B. Camp et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 1014 (2000).
  17. J. A. Sidles and D. Sigg, Phys. Lett. A 354, 167 (2006) and also as P030055 and T030120 from the LIGO Document Search Tool on www.ligo.org for an exhaustive treatment and interpretation.
  18. A. Gretarsson et al. (unpublished).
  19. From 03/25/2004 to 04/14/2004 available on Livingston Electronic Logs http://ilog.ligo-la.caltech.edu from the Detector web page.
  20. A.Gretarsson et al., L1 PRC studies 04/14/2004 informal talk for the initial LIGO commissioning meeting http://ligo.mit.edu/commissioning/; and also T060104 from the LIGO Document Search Tool.
  21. E. D’Ambrosio 02/06/2004 and 02/20/2004 view graphs available from the TCS meeting group agenda at http://www.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~sigg/TCS/; and also T060103 and T060102 from the LIGO Document Search Tool.
  22. G. Billingsley for the as built parameters of all LIGO optics, from http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/~gari under link LIGO I Core Optics Components.
  23. D.Sigg (private communication); Hanford Electronic Logs read-only accessible at http://apex.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/ilog/.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 73, 122002– Published 5 June, 2006
  • Received 27 February 2006

© 2006 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation