Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Phase diagram of neutral quark matter in nonlocal chiral quark models

D. Gómez Dumm1,2,*, D. B. Blaschke3,†, A. G. Grunfeld4,‡, and N. N. Scoccola2,4,5,§

  • 1IFLP, CONICET Dpto. de Física, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, C.C. 67, 1900 La Plata, ArgentinaCONICET, Rivadavia 1917, 1033 Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 2Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung (GSI), Planckstr. 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
  • 3Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, JINR Dubna, Joliot-Curie Street 6, 141980 Dubna, Russia
  • 4Physics Department, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Av. Libertador 8250, 1429 Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 5Universidad Favaloro, Solís 453, 1078 Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • *Electronic address: dumm@fisica.unlp.edu.ar
  • Electronic address: blaschke@theory.gsi.de; Present address: Institute of Physics, University of Rostock,D-18055 Rostock, Germany
  • Electronic address: grunfeld@tandar.cnea.gov.ar
  • §Electronic address: scoccola@tandar.cnea.gov.ar

Phys. Rev. D 73, 114019 – Published 20 June, 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.114019

Abstract

We consider the phase diagram of two-flavor quark matter under neutron star constraints for two nonlocal, covariant quark models within the mean-field approximation. In the first case (Model I) the nonlocality arises from the regularization procedure, motivated by the instanton liquid model, whereas in the second one (Model II) a separable approximation of the one-gluon exchange interaction is applied. We find that Model II predicts a larger quark mass gap and a chiral symmetry breaking (CSB) phase transition line which extends 15–20% further into the phase diagram spanned by temperature (T) and chemical potential (μ). The corresponding critical temperature at μ=0, Tc(0)140MeV, is in better accordance to recent lattice QCD results than the prediction of the standard local NJL model, which exceeds 200 MeV. For both Model I and Model II we have considered various coupling strengths in the scalar diquark channel, showing that different low-temperature quark matter phases can occur at intermediate densities: a normal quark matter (NQM) phase, a two-flavor superconducting (2SC) quark matter phase and a mixed 2SC-NQM phase. Although in most cases there is also a gapless 2SC phase, this occurs in general in a small region at nonzero temperatures, thus its effect should be negligible for compact star applications.

Article Text

References (57)

  1. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Ultra Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions, edited by H. G. Ritter and X. N. Wang (IOP, Bristol, 2004); J. Phys. G 30, S633 (2004).
  2. F. Karsch, K. Redlich, and A. Tawfik, Eur. Phys. J. C 29, 549 (2003).
  3. E. Shuryak, J. Phys. G 30, S1221 (2004); Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 53, 273 (2004).
  4. D. B. Blaschke and K. A. Bugaev, Fiz. B 13, 491 (2004); Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 53, 197 (2004).
  5. K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, in At the Frontier of Particle Physics. Handbook of QCD, edited by M. Shifman (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001); M. Alford, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 51, 131 (2001); D. Rischke, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 52, 197 (2004).
  6. Physics of Neutron Star Interiors, edited by D. Blaschke, N. K. Glendenning, and A. Sedrakian, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 578 (Springer, New York, 2001); Superdense QCD Matter and Compact Stars, edited by D. Blaschke and D. Sedrakian, NATO Science Series II, Vol. 197 (Springer, New York, 2006).
  7. T. Klähn et al., nucl-th/0602038.
  8. D. Bailin and A. Love, Phys. Rep. 107, 325 (1984).
  9. M. Alford, K. Rajagopal, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. B 422, 247 (1998); R. Rapp, T. Schäfer, E. V. Shuryak, andM. Velkovsky , Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 53 (1998).
  10. K. Iida and G. Baym, Phys. Rev. D 63, 074018 (2001); 66, 059903(E) (2002).
  11. M. Alford and K. Rajagopal, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2002) 031.
  12. C. Gocke, D. Blaschke, A. Khalatyan, and H. Grigorian, hep-ph/0104183.
  13. S. B. Rüster, V. Werth, M. Buballa, I. A. Shovkovy, and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 72, 034004 (2005).
  14. D. Blaschke, S. Fredriksson, H. Grigorian, A. M. Öztas, and F. Sandin, Phys. Rev. D 72, 065020 (2005).
  15. H. Abuki and T. Kunihiro, Nucl. Phys. A 768, 118 (2006).
  16. M. Baldo, M. Buballa, F. Burgio, F. Neumann, M. Oertel, and H. J. Schulze, Phys. Lett. B 562, 153 (2003).
  17. M. Buballa, Phys. Rep. 407, 205 (2005).
  18. I. Shovkovy and M. Huang, Phys. Lett. B 564, 205 (2003).
  19. D. Blaschke, S. Fredriksson, H. Grigorian, and A. M. Öztas, Nucl. Phys. A 736, 203 (2004).
  20. H. Grigorian, D. Blaschke, and D. N. Aguilera, Phys. Rev. C 69, 065802 (2004).
  21. D. N. Aguilera, D. Blaschke, and H. Grigorian, Nucl. Phys. A 757, 527 (2005).
  22. P. F. Bedaque, Nucl. Phys. A 697, 569 (2002).
  23. I. Shovkovy, M. Hanauske, and M. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 67, 103004 (2003).
  24. F. Neumann, M. Buballa, and M. Oertel, Nucl. Phys. A 714, 481 (2003).
  25. T. Schäfer and E. V. Shuryak, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 323 (1998).
  26. C. D. Roberts and A. G. Williams, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 33, 477 (1994); C. D. Roberts and S. M. Schmidt, 45, S1 (2000).
  27. J. Skullerud, D. B. Leinweber, and A. G. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 64, 074508 (2001).
  28. U. Vogl and W. Weise, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 27, 195 (1991); S. Klevansky, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 649 (1992); T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247, 221 (1994).
  29. E. Ruiz Arriola and L. L. Salcedo, Phys. Lett. B 450, 225 (1999).
  30. D. Blaschke, Y. L. Kalinovsky, G. Röpke, S. M. Schmidt, and M. K. Volkov, Phys. Rev. C 53, 2394 (1996).
  31. G. Ripka, Nucl. Phys. A 683, 463 (2001); R. S. Plant and M. C. Birse, 703, 717 (2002).
  32. H. Ito, W. Buck, and F. Gross, Phys. Rev. C 43, 2483 (1991); 45, 1918 (1992).
  33. M. Buballa and S. Krewald, Phys. Lett. B 294, 19 (1992).
  34. R. D. Bowler and M. C. Birse, Nucl. Phys. A 582, 655 (1995); R. S. Plant and M. C. Birse, 628, 607 (1998).
  35. A. Scarpettini, D. Gomez Dumm, and N. N. Scoccola, Phys. Rev. D 69, 114018 (2004).
  36. W. Broniowski, B. Golli, and G. Ripka, Nucl. Phys. A 703, 667 (2002).
  37. A. H. Rezaeian, N. R. Walet, and M. C. Birse, Phys. Rev. C 70, 065203 (2004).
  38. A. H. Rezaeian and H.-J. Pirner, Nucl. Phys. A 769, 35 (2006).
  39. D. Blaschke and P. C. Tandy, in Understanding Deconfinement in QCD (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000), p. 218.
  40. I. General, D. Gómez Dumm, and N. N. Scoccola, Phys. Lett. B 506, 267 (2001); D. Gómez Dumm and N. N. Scoccola, Phys. Rev. D 65, 074021 (2002).
  41. D. Gómez Dumm and N. N. Scoccola, Phys. Rev. C 72, 014909 (2005).
  42. R. S. Duhau, A. G. Grunfeld, and N. N. Scoccola, Phys. Rev. D 70, 074026 (2004).
  43. D. Blaschke, H. Grigorian, A. Khalatyan, and D. N. Voskresensky, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 141, 137 (2005).
  44. G. Ripka, Quarks Bound by Chiral Fields (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997).
  45. S. M. Schmidt, D. Blaschke, and Y. L. Kalinovsky, Phys. Rev. C 50, 435 (1994).
  46. P. Amore, M. C. Birse, J. A. McGovern, and N. R. Walet, Phys. Rev. D 65, 074005 (2002).
  47. M. Buballa and I. A. Shovkovy, Phys. Rev. D 72, 097501 (2005).
  48. D. Gómez Dumm, A. G. Grunfeld, and N. N. Scoccola (unpublished).
  49. R. T. Cahill, Nucl. Phys. A 543, 63C (1992), and Refs. therein.
  50. R. Alkofer, A. Holl, M. Kloker, A. Krassnigg, and C. D. Roberts, Few Body Syst. 37, 1 (2005).
  51. N. K. Glendenning, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1274 (1992).
  52. T. Tatsumi, M. Yasuhira, and D. N. Voskresensky, Nucl. Phys. A 718, 359 (2003).
  53. S. Reddy and G. Rupak, Phys. Rev. C 71, 025201 (2005).
  54. A. Gerhold and A. Rebhan, Phys. Rev. D 68, 011502 (2003).
  55. A. Kryjevski, Phys. Rev. D 68, 074008 (2003).
  56. D. D. Dietrich and D. H. Rischke, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 53, 305 (2004).
  57. D. Blaschke, C. D. Roberts, and S. M. Schmidt, Phys. Lett. B 425, 232 (1998).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation