Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Dimensional mutation and spacelike singularities

Eva Silverstein

  • SLAC and Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-4060, USA

Phys. Rev. D 73, 086004 – Published 14 April, 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.086004

Abstract

I argue that string theory compactified on a Riemann surface crosses over at small volume to a higher dimensional background of supercritical string theory. Several concrete measures of the count of degrees of freedom of the theory yield the consistent result that at finite volume, the effective dimensionality is increased by an amount of order 2h/V for a surface of genus h and volume V in string units. This arises in part from an exponentially growing density of states of winding modes supported by the fundamental group, and passes an interesting test of modular invariance. Further evidence for a plethora of examples with the spacelike singularity replaced by a higher dimensional phase arises from the fact that the sigma model on a Riemann surface can be naturally completed by many gauged linear sigma models, whose RG flows approximate time evolution in the full string backgrounds arising from this in the limit of large dimensionality. In recent examples of spacelike singularity resolution by tachyon condensation, the singularity is ultimately replaced by a phase with all modes becoming heavy and decoupling. In the present case, the opposite behavior ensues: more light degrees of freedom arise in the small radius regime. We comment on the emerging zoology of cosmological singularities that results.

Article Text

References (28)

  1. J. McGreevy and E. Silverstein, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2005) 090.
  2. G. T. Horowitz, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2005) 091; S. F. Ross, hep-th/0509066.
  3. A. Strominger and T. Takayanagi, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7, 369 (2003).
  4. B. Craps, S. Sethi, and E. P. Verlinde, hep-th/0506180.
  5. see e.g. D. Kutasov and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B358, 600 (1991).
  6. S. P. de Alwis, J. Polchinski, and R. Schimmrigk, Phys. Lett. B 218, 449 (1989).
  7. N. L. Balazs and A. Voros, Phys. Rep. 143, 109 (1986).
  8. see e.g. D. Mitchell and N. Turok, Nucl. Phys. B294, 1138 (1987).
  9. A. Iqbal, A. Neitzke, and C. Vafa, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 5, 769 (2002).
  10. A. Saltman and E. Silverstein, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2006) 139.
  11. R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2000) 006; S. B. Giddings, S. Kachru, and J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. D 66, 106006 (2002); E. Silverstein, hep-th/0106209; A. Maloney, E. Silverstein, and A. Strominger, hep-th/0205316; S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and S. P. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. D 68, 046005 (2003) et seq.
  12. S. Hellerman and X. Liu, hep-th/0409071.
  13. A. Adams, X. Liu, J. McGreevy, A. Saltman, and E. Silverstein, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2005) 033.
  14. C. Schmidhuber and A. A. Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B426, 187 (1994).
  15. A. R. Cooper, L. Susskind, and L. Thorlacius, Nucl. Phys. B363, 132 (1991).
  16. A. Giveon, D. Kutasov, and N. Seiberg, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 733 (1998).
  17. J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and J. Son, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 42, 2961 (2001).
  18. D. Orlando, hep-th/0502213; D. Israel, C. Kounnas, D. Orlando, and P. M. Petropoulos, Fortschr. Phys. 53, 1030 (2005).
  19. J. A. Harvey, D. Kutasov, E. J. Martinec, and G. W. Moore, hep-th/0111154.
  20. A. Adams, J. Polchinski, and E. Silverstein, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2001) 029.
  21. S. B. Giddings, Phys. Rev. D 68, 026006 (2003); E. Silverstein, hep-th/0405068.
  22. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B403, 159 (1993).
  23. J. Polchinski, Nucl. Phys. B324, 123 (1989); B. C. Da Cunha and E. J. Martinec, Phys. Rev. D 68, 063502 (2003); E. J. Martinec, hep-th/0305148.
  24. A. Strominger, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2001) 049.
  25. M. Alishahiha, A. Karch, and E. Silverstein, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2005) 028.
  26. A. Strominger, Phys. Rev. D 24, 3082 (1981).
  27. see e.g. the explanation in T. Hubsch, “Calabi-Yau manifolds: A Bestiary for physicists” (unpublished).
  28. J. Distler and S. Kachru, Nucl. Phys. B413, 213 (1994).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation