Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Merger of binary neutron stars with realistic equations of state in full general relativity

Masaru Shibata1, Keisuke Taniguchi2, and Kōji Uryū3

  • 1Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Komaba, Meguro, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
  • 2Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
  • 3Astrophysical Sector, SISSA, via Beirut 2/4, Trieste 34013, Italy

Phys. Rev. D 71, 084021 – Published 18 April, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.084021

Abstract

We present numerical results of three-dimensional simulations for the merger of binary neutron stars in full general relativity. Hybrid equations of state are adopted to mimic realistic nuclear equations of state. In this approach, we divide the equations of state into two parts as P=Pcold+Pth. Pcold is the cold part for which we assign a fitting formula for realistic equations of state of cold nuclear matter slightly modifying the formula developed by Haensel and Potekhin. We adopt the SLy and FPS equations of state for which the maximum allowed Arnowitt-Deser-Misner (ADM) mass of cold and spherical neutron stars is 2.04M and 1.80M, respectively. Pth denotes the thermal part which is written as Pth=(Γth1)ρ(εεcold), where ρ, ε, εcold, and Γth are the baryon rest-mass density, total specific internal energy, specific internal energy of the cold part, and the adiabatic constant, respectively. Simulations are performed for binary neutron stars of the total ADM mass in the range between 2.4M and 2.8M with the rest-mass ratio QM to be in the range 0.9QM1. It is found that if the total ADM mass of the system is larger than a threshold Mthr, a black hole is promptly formed in the merger irrespective of the mass ratios. In the other case, the outcome is a hypermassive neutron star of a large ellipticity, which results from the large adiabatic index of the realistic equations of state adopted. The value of Mthr depends on the equation of state: Mthr2.7M and 2.5M for the SLy and FPS equations of state, respectively. Gravitational waves are computed in terms of a gauge-invariant wave extraction technique. In the formation of the hypermassive neutron star, quasiperiodic gravitational waves of a large amplitude and of frequency between 3 and 4 kHz are emitted. The estimated emission time scale is 100ms, after which the hypermassive neutron star collapses to a black hole. Because of the long emission time, the effective amplitude may be large enough to be detected by advanced laser interferometric gravitational wave detectors if the distance to the source is smaller than 100Mpc. Thermal properties of the outcome formed after the merger are also analyzed to approximately estimate the neutrino emission energy.

Article Text

References (55)

  1. R. A. Hulse and J. H. Taylor, Astrophys. J. 201, L55 (1975); J. H. Taylor and J. M. Weisberg, 345, 434 (1989); J. M. Weisberg and J. H. Taylor, 576, 942 (2002).
  2. I. H. Stairs, Science 304, 547 (2004).
  3. M. Burgey et al., Nature (London) 426, 531 (2003).
  4. V. Kalogera et al., Astrophys. J. 601, L179 (2004); 614, L137 (2004).
  5. C. Cutler and K. S. Thorne, in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation, edited by N. T. Bishop and S. D. Maharaj (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002), p. 72, and references therein.
  6. TAMA Collaboration, M. Ando et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3950 (2001).
  7. M. Shibata, Phys. Rev. D 60, 104052 (1999).
  8. M. Shibata and K. Uryū, Phys. Rev. D 61, 064001 (2000).
  9. M. Shibata and K. Uryū, Prog. Theor. Phys. 107, 265 (2002).
  10. J. A. Font et al., Phys. Rev. D 65, 084024 (2002).
  11. J. A. Font, Living Rev. Relativity 6, 4 (2003).
  12. M. Shibata, K. Taniguchi, and K. Uryū, Phys. Rev. D 68, 084020 (2003).
  13. M. Miller, P. Gressman, and W.-M. Suen, Phys. Rev. D 69, 064026 (2004).
  14. M. D. Duez, P. Marronetti, T. W. Baumgarte, and S. L. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. D 67, 024004 (2003).
  15. L. Baiotti, I. Hawke, P. J. Montero, F. Löffer, L. Rezzolla, N. Stergioulas, J.  A. Font, and E. Seidel, Phys. Rev. D 71, 024035 (2005).
  16. R. Oechslin, K. Uryū, G. Poghosyan, and F. K. Thielemann, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 349, 1469 (2004).
  17. S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky, Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1983).
  18. S. Tsuruta, Phys. Rep. 292, 1 (1998).
  19. V. R. Pandharipande and D. G. Ravenhall, in Hot Nuclear Matter, edited by M. Soyeur, H. Flocard, B. Tamain, and M. Porneuf NATO Advanced Study Institutes Ser. B, Vol. 205, (Dordrecht, Reidel, 1989), p. 103.
  20. F. Douchin and P. Haensel, Astron. Astrophys. 380, 151 (2001).
  21. P. Haensel and A. Y. Potekhin, Astron. Astrophys. 428, 191 (2004).
  22. T. W. Baumgarte, S. L. Shapiro, and M. Shibata, Astrophys. J. Lett. 528, L29 (2000).
  23. F. Rasio and S. L. Shapiro, Astrophys. J. 432, 242 (1994).
  24. X. Zhuge, J. M. Centrella, and S. L. W. McMillan, Phys. Rev. D 54, 7261 (1996).
  25. J. A. Faber and F. A. Rasio, Phys. Rev. D 62, 064012 (2000); 63, 044012 (2001); 65, 084042 (2002).
  26. M. Shibata, Phys. Rev. D 67, 024033 (2003).
  27. M. Shibata and T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D 52, 5428 (1995).
  28. M. Shibata, Astrophys. J. 595, 992 (2003).
  29. M. Shibata, Phys. Rev. D 55, 2002 (1997); M. Shibata and K. Uryū, 62, 087501 (2000).
  30. J. R. Wilson and G. J. Mathews, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4161 (1995).
  31. C. S. Kochanek, Astrophys. J. 398, 234 (1992); L. Bildsten and C. Cutler, 400, 175 (1992).
  32. M. Shibata, Phys. Rev. D 58, 024012 (1998); S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J. 504, 442 (1998).
  33. E. Gourgoulhon et al., Phys. Rev. D 63, 064029 (2001).
  34. K. Taniguchi and E. Gourgoulhon, Phys. Rev. D 66, 104019 (2002); 68, 124025 (2003).
  35. V. Moncrief, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 88, 323 (1974). The Moncrief formalism was originally derived for the Schwarzschild space-time. We here apply his formalism in a flat space-time.
  36. M. Shibata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 101, 1199 (1999).
  37. M. Shibata and Y. Sekiguchi, Phys. Rev. D 71, 024014 (2005).
  38. M. Shibata and Y. Sekiguchi, Phys. Rev. D 68, 104020 (2003).
  39. M. Shibata and Y. Sekiguchi, Phys. Rev. D 69, 084024 (2004).
  40. S. Chandrasekhar, Stellar Structure (Dover, New York, 1967), Chap. 10.
  41. K. Uryū, M. Shibata, and Y. Eriguchi, Phys. Rev. D 62, 104015 (2000).
  42. M. Shibata and K. Uryū, Phys. Rev. D 64, 104017 (2001).
  43. R. A. James, Astrophys. J. 140, 552 (1964); J.-L. Tassoul, Theory of Rotating Stars (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1978).
  44. M. Shibata, T. W. Baumgarte, and S. L. Shapiro, Astrophys. J. 542, 453 (2000).
  45. E. W. Leaver, Proc. R. Soc. London A 402, 285 (1985). T. Nakamura, K. Oohara, and Y. Kojima, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 90, 1 (1987).
  46. N. D. Lyford, T. W. Baumgrate, and S. L. Shapiro, Astrophys. J. 583, 410 (2003).
  47. I. A. Morrison, T. W. Baumgrate, and S. L. Shapiro, Astrophys. J. 610, 941 (2004).
  48. M. Ruffert, H.-Th. Janka, and G. Schäfer, Astron. Astrophys. 311, 532 (1996); M. Ruffert et al., ibid. 319, 122 (1997); M. Ruffert and H.-Th. Janka, ibid. 380, 544 (2001).
  49. H.-Th. Janka and M. Ruffert, Astron. Astrophys. 307, L33 (1996).
  50. T. Piran, Phys. Rep. 314, 575 (1999); 333, 529 (2000); Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1143 (2005).
  51. D. Lai and S. L. Shapiro, Astrophys. J. 442, 259 (1995).
  52. L. Blanchet, G. Faye, B. R. Iyer, and B. Joguet, Phys. Rev. D 65, 061501 (2002); L. Blanchet, T. Damour, G. Esposito-Farese, and B. R. Iyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 091101 (2004).
  53. C. Cutler and E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D 49, 2658 (1994).
  54. M. Shibata, in preparation.
  55. M. Berger and J. Oliger, J. Comput. Phys. 53, 484 (1984); E. Enans, S. Iyer, E. Schnetter, W.-M. Suen, J. Tao, R. Wolfmeyer, and H.-M. Zhang, gr-qc/0501066; B. Zink, N. Stergioulas, I. Hawke, C. D. Ott, E. Schnetter, and E. Müller, gr-qc/0501080.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation