Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Limits on deviations from the inverse-square law on megaparsec scales

Carolyn Sealfon*, Licia Verde, and Raul Jimenez

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA

  • *Electronic address: csealfon@physics.upenn.edu
  • Electronic address: lverde@physics.upenn.edu
  • Electronic address: raulj@physics.upenn.edu

Phys. Rev. D 71, 083004 – Published 8 April, 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.083004

Abstract

We present an attempt to constrain deviations from the gravitational inverse-square law on large-scale structure scales. A perturbed law modifies the Poisson equation, which implies a scale-dependent growth of overdensities in the linear regime and thus modifies the power spectrum shape. We use two large-scale structure surveys (the Sloan Digital Sky survey and the Anglo-Australian two-degree field galaxy redshift survey) to constrain the parameters of two simple modifications of the inverse-square law. We find no evidence for deviations from normal gravity on the scales probed by these surveys (1023   m).

Article Text

References (30)

  1. E. G. Adelberger, B. R. Heckel, and A. E. Nelson, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 53, 77 (2003).
  2. P. J. E. Peebles, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 138, 5 (2005).
  3. G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and M. Porrati, Phys. Lett. B 485, 208 (2000).
  4. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, and G. Gabadadze, hep-th/0209227.
  5. C. Deffayet, G. Dvali, and G. Gabadadze, Phys. Rev. D 65, 044023 (2002).
  6. S. M. Carroll, V. Duvvuri, M. Trodden, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 70, 043528 (2004).
  7. A. Lue, R. Scoccimarro, and G. Starkman, Phys. Rev. D 69, 044005 (2004).
  8. M. Colless et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 328, 1039 (2001).
  9. W. J. Percival et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 327, 1297 (2001).
  10. J. E. Gunn et al., Astrophys. J. 116, 3040 (1998).
  11. SDSS Collaboration, D. G. York et al., Astron. J. 120, 1579 (2000).
  12. SDSS Collaboration, M. Tegmark et al., Astrophys. J. 606, 702 (2004).
  13. D. N. Spergel et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 148, 175 (2003).
  14. O. Lahav et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 333, 961 (2002).
  15. L. Verde et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 335, 432 (2002).
  16. Justification of this assumption, used in all analyses of large-scale structure, relies on the statistical properties of initially Gaussian random fields [17, 18].

  17. N. Kaiser, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 222, 323 (1986).
  18. R. J. Scherrer and D. H. Weinberg, Astrophys. J. 504, 607 (1998).
  19. J.-P. Uzan and F. Bernardeau, Phys. Rev. D 64, 083004 (2001).
  20. P. J. E. Peebles, astro-ph/0208037.
  21. A. R. Liddle, A. Mazumdar, and J. D. Barrow, Phys. Rev. D 58, 027302 (1998).
  22. A. Nusser, S. S. Gubser, and P. J. E. Peebles, astro-ph/0412586.
  23. A. Lue, R. Scoccimarro, and G. D. Starkman, Phys. Rev. D 69, 124015 (2004).
  24. We neglect the decaying solution.

  25. The differential equation is d^+[3HH+(2/H2Aa3)+3a]d^+[HH+(HH)2+3HaH32a2+(3Ho2ΩΛ/2H2a2)]d^=[(3/2a2)(3Ho2ΩΛ/2H2a2)]FΔ(s), where H and A are functions of a and primes denote d/da.

  26. P. J. E. Peebles, The Large Scale Structure of the Universe (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1980).
  27. S. Matarrese, L. Verde, and A. Heavens, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 290, 651 (1997).
  28. J. N. Fry, Astrophys. J. 279, 499 (1984).
  29. SDSS Collaboration, A. C. Pope et al., Astrophys. J. 607, 655 (2004).
  30. L. Verde et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 148, 195 (2003).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation