- Access by Xinjiang University
Twisted split fermions
Phys. Rev. D 71, 056007 – Published 31 March, 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.056007
Abstract
The observed flavor structure of the standard model arises naturally in “split fermion” models which localize fermions at different places in an extra dimension. It has, until now, been assumed that the bulk masses for such fermions can be chosen to be flavor diagonal simultaneously at every point in the extra dimension, with all the flavor violation coming from the Yukawa couplings to the Higgs field. We consider the more natural possibility in which the bulk masses cannot be simultaneously diagonalized, that is, that they are twisted in flavor space. We show that, in general, this does not disturb the natural generation of hierarchies in the flavor parameters. Moreover, it is conceivable that all the flavor mixing and -violation in the standard model may come only from twisting, with the five-dimensional Yukawa couplings taken to be universal.
Article Text
References (19)
- N. Arkani-Hamed and M. Schmaltz, Phys. Rev. D 61, 033005 (2000).
- E. A. Mirabelli and M. Schmaltz, Phys. Rev. D 61, 113011 (2000).
- H. Georgi, A. K. Grant, and G. Hailu, Phys. Rev. D 63, 064027 (2001).
- D. E. Kaplan and T. M. Tait, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2001) 051.
- B. Grzadkowski and M. Toharia, Nucl. Phys. B686, 165 (2004).
- G. Perez, Phys. Rev. D 67, 013009 (2003).
- Y. Grossman and G. Perez, Phys. Rev. D 67, 015011 (2003).
- Y. Nagatani and G. Perez, hep-ph/0401070.
- J. Hewett and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D 66, 010001 (2002).
- H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and U. Sarkar, Phys. Lett. B 541, 332 (2002); P. Q. Hung and M. Seco, Nucl. Phys. B653, 123 (2003); Y. Uehara, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2001) 034; G. Barenboim, G. C. Branco, A. de Gouvea, and M. N. Rebelo, Phys. Rev. D 64, 073005 (2001); J. L. Crooks, J. O. Dunn, and P. H. Frampton, Astrophys. J. 546, L1 (2001); S. Khalil and R. Mohapatra, Nucl. Phys. B695, 313 (2004); P. Q. Hung, M. Seco, and A. Soddu, B692, 83 (2004); J. M. Frere, G. Moreau, and E. Nezri, Phys. Rev. D 69, 033003 (2004); W. F. Chang and J. N. Ng, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2002) 077; P. Q. Hung, Phys. Rev. D 67, 095011 (2003).
- T. Matsuda, Phys. Rev. D 66, 047301 (2002); 66, 023508 (2002); 65, 107302 (2002).
- N. Haba and N. Maru, Phys. Rev. D 66, 055005 (2002); Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17, 2341 (2002); N. Haba, N. Maru, and N. Nakamura, Phys. Lett. B 557, 240 (2003); N. Maru, 522, 117 (2001); M. Kakizaki and M. Yamaguchi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19, 1715 (2004); M. Maru, N. Sakai, Y. Sakamura, and R. Sugisaka, Nucl. Phys. B616, 47 (2001); M. Kakizaki and M. Yamaguchi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 107, 433 (2002).
- D. E. Kaplan and T. M. Tait, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2000) 020; G. R. Dvali and M. A. Shifman, Phys. Lett. B 475, 295 (2000); A. Hebecker and J. March-Russell, 541, 338 (2002); F. Del Aguila and J. Santiago, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2002) 010.
- G. C. Branco, A. de Gouvea, and M. N. Rebelo, Phys. Lett. B 506, 115 (2001).
- N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Grossman, and M. Schmaltz, Phys. Rev. D 61, 115004 (2000); T. Han, G. D. Kribs, and B. McElrath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 031601 (2003); W. F. Chang, I. L. Ho, and J. N. Ng, Phys. Rev. D 66, 076004 (2002); S. Nussinov and R. Shrock, Phys. Lett. B 526, 137 (2002); Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 171601 (2002); D. J. Chung and T. Dent, Phys. Rev. D 66, 023501 (2002); T. G. Rizzo, 64, 015003 (2001); A. Masiero, M. Peloso, L. Sorbo, and R. Tabbash, 62, 063515 (2000).
- A. Delgado, A. Pomarol, and M. Quiros, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2000) 030; B. Lillie and J. L. Hewett, Phys. Rev. D 68, 116002 (2003).
- See, for example, A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1961), Vol. 2; L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).
- N. Shuhmaher (unpublished).
- See, for example, I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic, New York, 2000) 5th ed., Sec. 9.2.